Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

‘Dhurandhar: The Revenge’ Dominates Box Office Amid Growing Controversy

‘Dhurandhar: The Revenge’ has emerged as an unprecedented box office phenomenon, shattering records previously held by Bollywood blockbusters. In a mere 10 days since its release, the film has surpassed the lifetime earnings of established hits including ‘Pathaan,’ ‘Jawan,’ ‘Animal,’ ‘Chhaava,’ ‘Gadar 2,’ and ‘Stree 2.’

The action thriller’s commercial success has reverberated throughout the Indian film industry, garnering praise from prominent South Indian cinema personalities. Acclaimed filmmaker SS Rajamouli, along with stars Allu Arjun, Jr NTR, and veteran actor Brahmanandam, have publicly endorsed the film on social media platforms, particularly commending its patriotic themes and narrative approach.

However, the film’s meteoric rise hasn’t been without controversy. A growing contingent of critics has labeled ‘Dhurandhar’ a “propaganda film,” arguing that the movie distorts significant socio-economic and political events to advance a particular agenda. This criticism has sparked intense debate within film circles and among audiences nationwide.

Veteran actor Prakash Raj has aligned himself with these critics, openly questioning why certain South Indian celebrities have enthusiastically promoted the film. His statements have added fuel to an already heated discussion about the responsibilities of cinema in portraying historical events.

The controversy expanded when acclaimed Tamil director Vetrimaaran made pointed remarks about propaganda films at the trailer launch of ‘Neelira.’ Though he didn’t explicitly name ‘Dhurandhar,’ the timing and content of his comments led many to interpret them as criticism of Aditya Dhar’s spy thriller.

“Today, everything becomes propaganda. Propaganda has the power to influence memory,” Vetrimaaran stated. “We all know who was impacted by demonetization and how many lives were affected while standing in queues. It’s hate propaganda.” These comments have been widely perceived as an indirect reference to ‘Dhurandhar,’ which reportedly includes narrative elements surrounding India’s 2016 demonetization policy.

The debate intensified further when Reet Padda, sister of ‘Saiyaara’ actress Aneet Padda, shared her critical assessment of the film on social media. In a response to an Instagram comment, Padda explicitly categorized ‘Dhurandhar’ alongside other politically charged films such as ‘The Kerala Story’ and ‘The Kashmir Files.’

“For Dhurandhar, it literally serves as a government-friendly narrative, using political speeches to justify, say, the minor hiccup of demonetisation,” Padda wrote. “Call it propaganda? Yep. Deny it? Not a chance.”

Her comments sparked immediate backlash, with some social media users calling for a “cancellation” of her sister Aneet by association. The incident highlights the increasingly polarized nature of public discourse surrounding films with political undertones in India’s current climate.

Despite—or perhaps partly because of—this controversy, ‘Dhurandhar: The Revenge’ continues to draw massive audiences. The film directed by Aditya Dhar has clearly struck a chord with viewers across India, even as debates about its messaging intensify.

Film industry analysts note that the phenomenon of politically charged movies generating both box office success and controversy has become increasingly common in Indian cinema over the past few years. ‘Dhurandhar’ appears to be following in the footsteps of other commercially successful yet divisive films like ‘The Kashmir Files,’ which similarly sparked debates about the intersection of entertainment, history, and political narratives.

As ‘Dhurandhar: The Revenge’ continues its box office dominance, the conversations surrounding its content and impact reflect larger questions about cinema’s role in shaping public perception of historical and political events in contemporary India.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

18 Comments

  1. As someone interested in Indian cinema, I’m following this story with a mix of curiosity and concern. I hope the discourse around the film remains respectful and focuses on the substantive issues rather than descending into partisan bickering.

    • Well said. Maintaining a nuanced, balanced perspective is crucial when dealing with potentially controversial films and the debates they spark.

  2. Isabella O. Johnson on

    The box office numbers are impressive, but I wonder if the film’s success is more a reflection of the current political climate in India than the quality of the filmmaking itself. It’s a complex issue that deserves further examination.

    • Linda C. Rodriguez on

      That’s a fair assessment. The political and social context in which a film is released can certainly influence its performance, regardless of its artistic merits.

  3. The box office success is impressive, but the ‘propaganda’ accusations are concerning. I hope the filmmakers respond to the criticism in a thoughtful way and don’t just dismiss it.

    • Olivia I. Garcia on

      Good point. Transparency and engaging with the critique constructively would go a long way in addressing the controversy.

  4. The backlash against the critics is troubling. Even if one disagrees with their views, silencing dissent and trying to intimidate them is a dangerous path. I hope the filmmakers and their supporters respond with more openness and dialogue.

    • Michael Brown on

      Absolutely. Healthy debate and exchange of ideas should be encouraged, not shut down. Resorting to backlash and intimidation undermines the credibility of the film’s supporters.

  5. Michael Z. Thomas on

    I’m always cautious about films that are accused of being ‘propaganda.’ It’s a loaded term and can sometimes be used to dismiss works that don’t align with certain political views. But the concerns raised here seem worth exploring further.

    • James Jackson on

      Agree, ‘propaganda’ is a charged word. A more nuanced discussion focused on the film’s creative choices and historical accuracy would be helpful in assessing the validity of the criticism.

  6. Elizabeth B. Hernandez on

    I’m curious to hear more about the specific criticisms of the film’s portrayal of historical/political events. Is it a case of creative license gone too far, or a deliberate attempt to distort the facts?

    • That’s a fair question. It would be helpful to have a more nuanced analysis of the film’s narrative choices and how they align (or don’t) with the known facts.

  7. The endorsements from prominent South Indian filmmakers are noteworthy. But I wonder if their support is more about industry solidarity than a genuine assessment of the film’s merits.

    • That’s a good point. The industry dynamics and potential political leanings of those endorsing the film should also be considered in evaluating their reactions.

  8. It’s interesting to see the clash between commercial success and artistic/political critiques. I wonder if there’s a way for the film to be appreciated for its technical/entertainment value while also acknowledging the valid concerns raised about its messaging.

    • Jennifer Taylor on

      That’s a thoughtful perspective. Compartmentalizing the different aspects of the film and evaluating them independently could lead to a more constructive discussion.

  9. Interesting to see the debate around this film. Seems like it’s stirring strong reactions, both positive and negative. I wonder if the ‘propaganda’ claims have merit or if it’s just a divisive issue that people are taking sides on.

    • Agreed, it’s a complex issue. I think it’s important to look at the film objectively and separate the artistic merits from any potential political agenda.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.