Listen to the article
Brussels authorities have canceled the screening of a Russian documentary film that Ukrainian officials denounced as propaganda justifying Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, according to an announcement from the Embassy of Ukraine in Belgium.
The film “Carnet de Russie” was scheduled to be shown in Brussels’ Ixelles district before local municipal authorities decided to halt the screening following diplomatic pressure and concerns about its content.
“The Embassy of Ukraine in the Kingdom of Belgium welcomes the decision taken by the competent municipal authorities of Brussels to cancel the planned screening of the documentary film ‘Carnets de Russie,'” the embassy stated. The diplomatic mission had previously issued a “firm condemnation” of the planned screening, characterizing it as an attempt to legitimize disinformation from Russia, which they described as “the aggressor state.”
Ukrainian officials expressed gratitude for the Belgian authorities’ responsiveness to their concerns, noting the importance of preventing public platforms from being used to “spread narratives that distort reality or undermine accountability” regarding Russia’s military actions in Ukraine.
The embassy emphasized that such decisions help maintain integrity in public discourse during an ongoing conflict that has drawn international condemnation since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022.
“The Embassy of Ukraine remains grateful to Belgium for its constant solidarity and support for Ukraine at all levels,” the diplomatic mission added in its statement, highlighting the significance of maintaining factual accuracy in communications about the war.
This incident in Brussels reflects a broader pattern across Europe, where Ukrainian diplomatic missions have increasingly challenged Russian cultural events that they perceive as vehicles for propaganda or as normalizing relations with Russia while the war continues.
Ukrainian Ambassador to Belgium Yaroslav Melnyk pointed to what he described as a growing number of Russian cultural events throughout Europe, warning that these activities often serve to support Russian President Vladimir Putin’s political agenda. The ambassador suggested that Russian cultural exports cannot be separated from the country’s political objectives.
Similar interventions have occurred elsewhere in Europe. In Switzerland, a screening of a film about Ukraine was recently canceled following protests. German authorities in Mannheim called off a concert by Russian violinist Vadim Repin after the Ukrainian ambassador raised concerns, which led to discussions between local officials. In Florence, Italy, performances by Russian ballerina Svetlana Zakharova and violinist Repin were also canceled under similar circumstances.
These cancellations highlight the cultural dimension of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which extends beyond military operations to include battles over narrative and representation in public spaces. Cultural events have become flashpoints for diplomatic tension as European countries navigate their relationships with both Russia and Ukraine.
The Belgian decision comes as European nations continue to balance their historical cultural ties with Russia against their political support for Ukraine and opposition to the invasion, which has triggered the continent’s largest refugee crisis since World War II and reshaped European security policy.
Belgium, like many EU nations, has supported Ukraine through humanitarian aid, military equipment, and sanctions against Russia since the war began, reflecting a broader European consensus against Russian aggression despite the economic consequences of these policies.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
This is a tricky situation. On one hand, we want to avoid giving a platform to blatant propaganda. But on the other, censorship can be a slippery slope. Perhaps a moderated discussion or additional context could have been a middle ground solution here.
Hmm, this is a complex issue without easy answers. I can see both sides – the need to prevent the spread of disinformation, but also the principle of free expression. Ultimately, I think the authorities will need to carefully weigh the potential harms and benefits to make the best decision.
It’s understandable that the Ukrainian government would be concerned about this film, given the ongoing conflict. But I’m not convinced that canceling the screening is the best way forward. Thoughtful, nuanced discussion and analysis would be a healthier approach in my opinion.
While I understand the sensitivity around this film, I’m not sure canceling the screening is the best approach. Shouldn’t we allow open debate and critical examination of all perspectives, even if we disagree with them? Suppressing information rarely leads to positive outcomes.
Interesting development. I can see both sides of this issue – the need to prevent the spread of disinformation, but also the principle of free expression. Perhaps a moderated discussion after the screening could have been a compromise solution.
Tough call by the authorities. On one hand, we want to avoid giving platforms to blatant propaganda. But on the other, open dialogue and debate are important, even for controversial topics. I’m curious to hear more about the specific concerns raised by the Ukrainian embassy.
While I respect the Ukrainian government’s perspective, I’m not sure censorship is the right answer here. Shouldn’t we engage with these ideas head-on and expose any falsehoods or distortions, rather than trying to suppress them? This seems like a complex issue without a clear-cut solution.