Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In a strongly-worded critique, the African Democratic Congress has accused the Tinubu administration of manipulating food prices and using hunger as a political weapon amid Nigeria’s ongoing economic challenges.

The opposition party, through its spokesman Bolaji Abdullahi, disputed recent government claims about declining food prices, describing them as “misleading” and “artificial.” According to the ADC, any reported drops in food costs stem from import waivers flooding markets with foreign products rather than genuine improvements in domestic production.

“Contrary to what is being celebrated in official circles, the reality on the ground, as confirmed by struggling farmers and families across the country, is that the Tinubu government is manipulating food prices and weaponising hunger for political gain,” Abdullahi stated on Tuesday.

The ADC argued that the temporary relief from lower prices comes at a significant cost to local agriculture. Nigerian farmers, already facing mounting challenges from soaring input costs—particularly fertilizer prices—and persistent security concerns, now find themselves unable to compete with cheaper imported alternatives.

This situation represents what the party describes as a short-sighted approach that creates an “illusion of economic progress” while undermining domestic food security in the longer term.

The opposition party expressed particular skepticism about the sustainability of any price reductions, characterizing them as “temporary, unsustainable, and driven by panic, not strategy or deliberate planning.” The ADC maintains that genuine improvements in Nigeria’s food situation would require addressing the fundamental issues of agricultural productivity, farmer support, and rural security.

Nigeria’s agricultural sector has faced multiple challenges in recent years. Widespread insecurity in farming communities, particularly in the country’s northern regions, has disrupted planting and harvesting cycles. Simultaneously, rising costs for agricultural inputs, exacerbated by currency devaluation and global supply chain disruptions, have squeezed smallholder farmers who produce most of the nation’s food.

The ADC also challenged the government’s claim that it hasn’t released imported food stocks into markets, presenting a troubling alternative interpretation: “If we are to even momentarily entertain this falsehood, it begs an even more damning question: why is the government hoarding food while the people go hungry? What sort of administration stores food in warehouses during a hunger crisis?”

The allegations come amid broader concerns about Nigeria’s food security. International organizations have warned about increased risk of food insecurity in parts of the country, with inflation pushing essential foodstuffs beyond the reach of many families. Food inflation has consistently outpaced overall inflation, creating particular hardship for lower-income households who spend a larger proportion of their income on basic sustenance.

President Tinubu’s administration has previously highlighted agricultural investment and food security as priorities, launching initiatives aimed at boosting domestic production. Government spokespersons have pointed to specific policy measures, including support for smallholder farmers and efforts to address security challenges in agricultural regions.

However, the ADC’s critique suggests a significant gap between government rhetoric and the lived experiences of Nigerian citizens struggling with food costs. The opposition party concluded its statement by calling for “a complete overhaul of the current agricultural approach,” suggesting the need for more comprehensive and sustainable strategies to address the nation’s food challenges.

As Nigeria continues to navigate complex economic reforms, the debate over food policy and price manipulation highlights the political tensions surrounding basic economic issues in Africa’s most populous nation.

Verify This Yourself

Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently

Reverse Image Search

Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts

Ask Our AI About This Claim

Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis

👋 Hi! I can help you understand this fact-check better. Ask me anything about this claim, related context, or how to verify similar content.

Related Fact-Checks

See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims

Loading fact-checks...

Want More Verification Tools?

Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools

14 Comments

  1. This is a complex issue with important implications for food security and political stability. While the ADC’s accusations are serious, I’d like to see more detailed data and analysis from both sides before drawing conclusions. Transparent, fact-based dialogue is crucial here.

  2. Jennifer Smith on

    The ADC raises valid concerns about the potential political weaponization of food prices. Maintaining fair and stable food markets is essential for protecting vulnerable populations. Objective analysis of the data and policies on both sides will be key to understanding the full context.

    • Absolutely. Striking the right balance between supporting local agriculture and ensuring affordable access to food is no easy task, especially in uncertain economic times. Hoping for an evidence-based, inclusive resolution.

  3. The ADC’s claims raise serious concerns that deserve careful investigation. Maintaining a healthy, productive agricultural sector and fair, accessible food prices are both vital national interests. I hope the government and opposition can work together constructively, guided by objective data and analysis.

  4. Amelia Y. Hernandez on

    This is a concerning situation that requires impartial investigation. Accusations of food price manipulation for political gain are grave and must be thoroughly substantiated. All stakeholders should prioritize food security and equitable market dynamics over partisan interests.

  5. Patricia B. Thompson on

    Allegations of food price manipulation for political gain are extremely concerning. Both the government and the ADC should provide transparent, data-driven evidence to support their respective positions. The well-being of Nigerian citizens must be the top priority, not partisan agendas.

  6. This is a complex issue with high stakes for food security and political stability. The ADC’s accusations warrant close examination, but claims on both sides need to be substantiated with robust data and analysis. An inclusive, evidence-based process to find solutions is essential.

    • Jennifer White on

      Agreed. Maintaining vibrant local agriculture while ensuring affordable access to food is a delicate balance. Transparent, fact-based dialogue between all stakeholders will be crucial to navigating this challenge effectively.

  7. Interesting accusations from the ADC. Monitoring food prices and their impact on local agriculture is certainly important, especially in challenging economic times. Curious to see how the government responds and what data supports their claims of declining prices.

    • Agreed, transparency around food price data and its effect on domestic producers is crucial. Hope this situation can be resolved constructively.

  8. The ADC’s claims about the government’s actions deserve serious consideration. Maintaining a healthy agricultural sector and affordable food prices are both critical priorities. I hope an objective analysis of the data can shed light on the situation and inform constructive solutions.

    • Absolutely. Fact-based dialogue between the government, opposition, and other stakeholders will be key to finding the right balance and protecting the interests of both producers and consumers.

  9. Amelia Thompson on

    The ADC’s claims about food price manipulation warrant close examination. Maintaining vibrant local agriculture is vital, but so is ensuring affordable access to food for all. I hope the government and opposition can work together constructively to find solutions supported by robust data.

    • William T. Brown on

      Agreed. An open, evidence-based process that considers the needs of both producers and consumers will be essential. Politically charged accusations alone won’t resolve this challenge.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved. Designed By Sawah Solutions.