Listen to the article
The annual White House governors’ dinner, long considered a bipartisan tradition fostering cooperation between state leaders and the president, descended into political controversy this week during President Donald Trump’s second term.
What normally serves as a cordial gathering quickly became contentious when Trump publicly criticized the National Governors Association’s leadership—Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma and Democratic Gov. Wes Moore of Maryland—before initially refusing to invite Moore and Colorado Gov. Jared Polis to a working session at the White House on Friday.
After significant pressure and threats of a Democratic boycott, the administration reversed course and included the previously excluded governors. However, the damage was already done, with several Democratic governors announcing they would skip Saturday’s dinner in protest.
“President Trump has made this whole thing a farce,” Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey said in a statement explaining her decision to abstain from the event.
Even the Friday working session ended abruptly when Trump received news of the Supreme Court’s decision striking down his administration’s sweeping tariff policy. The president’s hasty departure left governors from both parties frustrated by the week’s chaotic proceedings.
“It was unfortunate that the Supreme Court came out with a bad ruling at that time,” said Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican and prominent Trump ally, acknowledging the disruptive nature of the meeting’s conclusion.
Sources indicated that some Democratic governors planned to attend an alternative event instead of the White House dinner, according to an individual with knowledge of the arrangements who requested anonymity due to lack of authorization to speak publicly.
Veterans of past governors’ gatherings emphasized the traditionally valuable nature of these dinners. Former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, who briefly challenged Trump for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, recalled the unique networking opportunities these events provided.
“It’s a glowing evening in the White House,” said Hutchinson, a former NGA chair, noting how he was once seated with then-Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo, providing an opportunity to connect with her family in a setting removed from political pressures.
Despite the controversy surrounding the dinner, the National Governors Association continued its scheduled conference on Saturday, focusing on critical issues including economic affordability and political civility. During a session on immigration reform, both Moore and Stitt acknowledged the historical failure of both political parties to meaningfully address the issue over decades.
Stitt advocated for empowering states to issue workforce permits and cautioned against simplistic political characterizations. “People think ‘OK, all the Democrats want open borders,'” he said, “and ‘all Republicans hate immigrants.'”
The Oklahoma governor went on to reveal that “rural Oklahoma Trump voters” have privately approached him expressing concerns about operating their businesses without workers seeking legal work authorization—illustrating the complex reality beyond partisan talking points.
The disruption surrounding this traditionally unifying event reflects broader political polarization that has intensified during Trump’s second term, with even customary presidential traditions becoming battlegrounds for partisan disagreement.
For his part, Moore remained optimistic about the conference’s overall achievements despite the week’s challenges. “There were a lot of things that were put in our way to try to distract us from our mission, to try to divide us as individual governors,” Moore said, “to try to make the mission of this organization where a bipartisan group of governors can come together and solve problems on behalf of our people, to try to make our work irrelevant.”
In a defiant conclusion, Moore added, “To all the people who tried to make that happen, you failed.”
The controversy underscores the increasing difficulty of maintaining bipartisan traditions in Washington’s current political climate, where even ceremonial events can quickly become flashpoints for wider ideological disputes.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
Seems like a lot of political theater surrounding this event. At the end of the day, the governors and the White House need to work together effectively on critical issues like mining, energy, and economic development. Hopefully cooler heads will prevail.
Well said. Partisan posturing helps no one. Pragmatic cooperation is what’s needed to address the real challenges facing states and the country.
This dinner sounds like it really highlighted the deep political divisions in the country. I hope the governors can find a way to move past the partisan bickering and focus on the real issues facing their states and the nation.
The tensions between the president and some state governors are concerning. Effective cooperation and communication between federal and state leaders is crucial, especially on issues impacting industries like mining and energy.
Agreed. Hopefully the administration and governors can find a way to set aside their differences and work together pragmatically on shared priorities.
Interesting read. Seems like the White House dinner was quite the political minefield this year. I wonder how the governors will navigate these partisan divides going forward.
Yes, it’s a shame the dinner descended into controversy. These types of events should be about finding common ground, not scoring political points.
The fallout from the White House dinner highlights the growing divisions in US politics. However, I hope the governors and administration can find a way to put aside their differences and work together constructively on issues impacting key industries.
It’s disappointing to see such a long-standing tradition become so politicized. The mining and energy sectors need stable, collaborative federal-state relations to thrive. Hopefully the governors can find a way to reengage constructively.