Listen to the article
California DMV Director Faces Scrutiny Over Road Safety Failures
California’s Department of Motor Vehicles Director Steve Gordon faced intense questioning from state lawmakers Tuesday about his agency’s apparent failure to address rising road fatalities across the state.
During a rare joint informational hearing by the Senate public safety and transportation committees, Gordon struggled to provide concrete answers to legislators’ concerns. When pressed on critical safety issues, he repeatedly claimed he didn’t know if the DMV could expedite license suspensions for dangerous drivers, couldn’t provide data on enforcement actions, and was unfamiliar with his own agency’s statistics showing minimal investigations into crashes causing serious injuries or deaths.
Instead, Gordon characterized the DMV’s operations as “complex,” “very inside baseball,” and “extremely nuanced,” promising to follow up with details later.
The hearing, reportedly the first legislative session focused on DUIs, traffic laws, and roadway fatalities in decades, was inspired by CalMatters’ “License to Kill” investigative series. The reporting revealed that California routinely allows drivers with dangerous histories to remain on the road, where they continue to cause fatal accidents. The investigation also highlighted that California maintains some of the nation’s weakest DUI laws and that courts frequently fail to report vehicular homicide convictions to the DMV.
Senator Dave Cortese, a Democrat from San Jose who cited the CalMatters investigation, joined colleagues in pressing Gordon on why it was difficult for legislative staff to obtain basic data from the DMV while lawmakers consider new DUI legislation. Other senators questioned how drivers with multiple offenses maintain their licenses and why the agency seems to move swiftly on issues like toll collection but slowly on potentially life-saving measures.
Senator Catherine Blakespear of Encinitas pointedly remarked, “The DMV, when they feel it’s important, can act quickly. But then there are these other things that seem to be really stuck in molasses.”
Gordon, who has declined interview requests for nearly a year since the investigative series began, acknowledged that driver safety was not his top priority when appointed by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2019. “I’ll admit that wasn’t the first team we attacked, because we were worried about lines and Real ID and a bunch of other things that were occurring,” Gordon said, adding that the department has since begun updating its processes but “there’s still much more to do.”
Senator Caroline Menjivar, who recently proposed legislation to lengthen suspensions for reckless driving, questioned why the DMV opened only about 3,300 “negligent operator cases” from 2022 through 2024, despite state data showing nearly 55,000 fatal or serious injury crashes during that period. When asked if changing legal language from “may conduct an investigation” to “shall investigate” would help, Gordon deflected, stating: “It’s not a question of a ‘shall’ or a ‘may.’ I believe we have the capacity we need to investigate every case that comes to us.”
Lawmakers also heard testimony from road safety experts, legal professionals, and victims’ advocates during the nearly four-hour session. Napa District Attorney Allison Haley described cases including a driver with 13 DUIs and another who killed two people but served essentially the same sentence as if he’d killed one. “This isn’t Costco. We don’t want a system where you can kill one person and kill another person — or more — for free,” Haley said.
Some witnesses advocated for road redesign and proactive substance abuse treatment rather than harsher criminal penalties, which they argued could disproportionately impact first-time offenders or economically disadvantaged defendants.
The emotional weight of the issue was underscored by testimony from Tara Repka Flores, whose 13-year-old son Alec was killed in 2019 by a drunk driver taking her own children to school in Sutter County. Flores implored senators to implement comprehensive reforms: “Ignition interlock? Yes. Stronger sentencing? Yes. Accountability for hit and run drivers? Yes. Yes to all of it. Stop other people from getting killed.”
In response to these concerns, California legislators have introduced twelve road safety bills this session aimed at addressing systemic failures and strengthening consequences for dangerous driving behaviors.
When approached by a CalMatters reporter after the hearing, Gordon declined to comment, saying only, “we’re not doing press today,” before leaving the building.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
This is a sobering wake-up call. The DMV must improve its processes and oversight to prevent further tragedies on California’s roads. Comprehensive reforms are urgently needed.
Characterizing these life-and-death issues as “complex” and “nuanced” is unacceptable. The director needs to take responsibility and provide concrete solutions.
Tragic that it’s taken this level of legislative scrutiny to address the DMV’s failures. Public safety should be the top priority, not bureaucratic excuses.
I’m glad the legislature is finally shining a light on these deadly DMV failures. Drivers with dangerous histories should face swifter license suspensions to protect innocent lives.
The DMV’s lack of enforcement data is troubling. They need to provide clear statistics and enforcement actions to demonstrate they are taking this crisis seriously.
Californians deserve a DMV that proactively identifies dangerous drivers and suspends their licenses to protect innocent lives. This hearing is a crucial step in the right direction.
I hope this leads to meaningful reforms at the DMV. Drivers with histories of DUIs or other reckless behavior must face swift consequences to make our roads safer.
This is an alarming situation. The DMV’s apparent failure to address rising road fatalities is deeply concerning. Lawmakers are right to demand accountability and concrete action to improve public safety.
The DMV director’s evasive responses are unacceptable. Californians deserve transparent, data-driven leadership to address this critical issue.