Listen to the article
President Trump is prioritizing high home prices over affordability, potentially risking younger voter support in the upcoming midterms, according to analysts familiar with the situation.
“I don’t want to drive housing prices down. I want to drive housing prices up for people that own their homes,” Trump told his Cabinet on January 29, taking a stance that contradicts recommendations from economists, real estate professionals, and housing experts who have called for increased construction to address America’s growing affordability crisis.
The president’s position appears strategically aimed at older Americans who are more likely to own homes and vote in midterm elections. According to AP VoteCast data, 81% of Trump’s voters in the 2024 presidential election were homeowners, many of whom already have mortgages with favorable rates or own their homes outright.
However, political analysts warn this approach could alienate younger voters who were crucial to Trump’s coalition in 2024. “The under-40 group is the most important right now — they are the ones who put Trump in the White House,” said Brent Buchanan, whose polling firm Cygnal advises Republicans. “If they feel that Donald Trump is taking care of the boomers at their expense, that is going to hurt Republicans.”
Housing affordability has emerged as a top concern for voters, particularly younger Americans facing historically high barriers to homeownership. The shortage of available housing has driven prices upward across many regions, pricing potential first-time buyers out of the market.
Shay Hata, a real estate agent handling transactions in the Chicago and Denver areas, describes the current market as “very discouraging for buyers because they’re getting priced out of the market.” She notes that most properties in Chicago suburbs are receiving between five and twenty offers, highlighting the severe inventory shortage.
Construction data reveals a concerning trend under Trump’s administration. Permits for single-family homes have declined 9.4% over the twelve months leading to October, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, with an annual rate of just 876,000 new permits.
The president’s stance represents a shift from his campaign rhetoric. During the 2024 presidential race, Trump’s team proposed tax breaks for homebuyers, reduced construction regulations, opening federal land for development, and policies to make monthly payments more manageable. As recently as October, Trump urged builders to increase construction, referencing “2 Million empty lots” and asking Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to help “restore the American Dream.”
Since taking office, Trump has focused primarily on pressuring the Federal Reserve to cut benchmark interest rates to make mortgages more affordable, though critics warn this approach could fuel inflation. He also directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to purchase at least $200 billion in home loan securities to reduce rates and has proposed banning large financial institutions from buying homes.
Lawmakers from both parties recognize the political importance of addressing housing affordability before the midterm elections. Bipartisan efforts in Congress aim to stimulate construction through zoning reform incentives and other measures.
The fundamental challenge remains that home prices have outpaced income growth for years, making down payments increasingly difficult and turning primary residences into critical financial assets. Edward Pinto, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, estimates that single-family home construction would need to increase by 50% to 100% over the next three years just to keep average home price gains flat.
“It’s very hard to crater home prices,” Pinto noted, suggesting that Trump’s concerns about falling home values may be overstated, even with significantly increased construction.
As the midterm elections approach, Trump’s housing policies may prove to be a critical test of his ability to balance the interests of his traditional supporters against the needs of the younger voters who helped secure his return to the White House.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
13 Comments
Interesting take. Home prices are a sensitive topic with valid arguments on both sides. The administration will need to carefully weigh the tradeoffs and consider the impacts on different voter groups to find a balanced solution that addresses affordability without stifling the market.
Interesting perspective. Home prices are a double-edged sword – good for existing owners but a barrier for first-time buyers. The administration will need to carefully weigh the tradeoffs to avoid alienating key voter groups.
Interesting take. Driving up home prices may benefit some voters, but could alienate younger and lower-income buyers who are crucial to the administration’s coalition. A more nuanced policy approach may be needed to address this complex issue.
This is a tricky issue with valid concerns on both sides. While higher home prices may benefit some voters, they also price out many younger and first-time buyers. The administration will need to carefully weigh the tradeoffs to find a balanced solution.
This is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. While supporting current homeowners is important, the administration will need to carefully consider the impacts on younger and first-time buyers as well. A balanced approach may be needed to address affordability concerns without stifling the market.
Interesting perspective. Home prices are a sensitive topic with valid concerns for both current owners and prospective buyers. The administration will need to carefully weigh the tradeoffs and consider the impacts on different voter groups to find a balanced solution.
This is a complex issue with no easy answers. While higher home prices may benefit some voters, they also price out many younger and first-time buyers. The administration will need to carefully consider the impacts on different groups and find a balanced approach to address affordability concerns.
Interesting perspective. Home prices are a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. The administration will need to carefully consider the tradeoffs and impacts on different voter groups to develop a balanced approach that addresses affordability concerns without unduly disrupting the market.
Home prices are a sensitive topic with valid arguments on both sides. The administration will need to carefully consider the impacts on different voter groups to find an approach that balances the interests of current owners and prospective buyers.
This is a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. While higher home prices benefit existing owners, they also price out many younger and first-time buyers. A balanced approach is needed to address affordability without stifling the market.
This is a challenging issue with valid concerns on both sides. While supporting current homeowners is important, the administration will also need to consider the impacts on younger and first-time buyers. A nuanced policy approach may be needed to find a balanced solution.
It’s a delicate balance between supporting current homeowners and addressing affordability concerns, especially for younger voters. Policies that encourage responsible development and targeted assistance for first-time buyers may be a better approach than simply driving up prices across the board.
This is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. While higher home prices may benefit current homeowners, they also price out younger and lower-income buyers. A balanced approach is needed to ensure housing affordability without stifling the market.