Listen to the article
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Monday that two additional individuals have been arrested following a protest at a Minnesota church, bringing the total number of arrests to nine in connection with the incident.
The arrests stem from a January 18 demonstration at Cities Church in St. Paul, where protesters interrupted services. A grand jury indictment unsealed on Friday charged all nine individuals with federal civil rights violations, specifically conspiracy and interfering with the First Amendment rights of worshippers.
Among those arrested on Friday were independent journalists Don Lemon and Georgia Fort, along with two others. Three individuals had been taken into custody earlier in the week, including prominent local activist Nekima Levy Armstrong.
In a social media statement Monday, Bondi identified the two most recent arrestees as Ian Davis Austin and Jerome Deangelo Richardson, though she provided no details regarding the circumstances of their apprehensions. According to online jail records, Austin was arrested Friday, while the timing of Richardson’s arrest remains unclear.
The indictment alleges that Richardson traveled to the church with Lemon while the latter was streaming the event. According to court documents, Richardson reportedly told Lemon they needed to catch up with other protesters. The indictment further claims that Austin stood in the church aisles and loudly confronted a pastor with questions about Christian nationalism.
Lemon, who was terminated from CNN in 2023 following a controversial stint as a morning show host, has maintained that he had no affiliation with the group that disrupted the Sunday service. He has described himself as an independent journalist who was documenting the protesters’ activities.
The Justice Department launched its investigation after demonstrators interrupted the church service by chanting “ICE out” and “Justice for Renee Good.” The protesters were referencing the case of Good, a 37-year-old mother of three who was fatally shot by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer in Minneapolis.
The church at the center of the controversy, Cities Church, is affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention. It lists David Easterwood among its pastors, who also serves as the leader of ICE’s St. Paul field office. This connection appears to have made the church a target for the immigration protest.
The Trump administration has strongly objected to the protest, viewing it as an infringement on religious freedom and First Amendment rights of the congregation.
Sarah Gad, Austin’s attorney, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Court records do not yet list legal representation for Richardson.
The case highlights growing tensions surrounding immigration enforcement policies in the United States. Under the Biden administration, immigration has become an increasingly divisive issue, with activists pushing for reforms to ICE operations while others support stricter enforcement measures.
The charges against the protesters are significant, as they involve federal civil rights violations rather than simple trespassing or disruption charges that might typically be handled at the local level. This federal approach signals the Justice Department’s stance on protecting religious services from political demonstrations.
The involvement of journalists in the arrests has raised additional concerns about press freedoms and the distinction between reporting on protests and participating in them. Lemon’s presence at the event and subsequent arrest have drawn particular attention given his national profile as a former CNN anchor.
As the case proceeds through the federal court system, it may establish precedent regarding the boundaries between First Amendment protections for protesters and the rights of religious congregations to conduct services without interference.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
This case highlights the delicate balance between public order and civil liberties. I hope the authorities can find a way to uphold the law while respecting fundamental rights.
Well said. Maintaining public safety is important, but not at the expense of core constitutional freedoms. Striking the right balance is crucial in these situations.
Interesting development in this ongoing story. I’m curious to learn more about the specific charges and the justification for such a robust law enforcement response.
Yes, the details will be important here. Peaceful protest is a fundamental right, but it has to be weighed against other concerns like public order.
The arrest of independent journalists is particularly worrying. The press plays a vital role in holding the government accountable, even in contentious situations.
I agree. Restricting media access to protests sets a dangerous precedent. Transparency and the free flow of information are critical in a democracy.
This looks like a complex and politically charged situation. I hope the authorities can find a measured approach that upholds the law while respecting fundamental rights.
Well said. Maintaining public order is important, but not at the expense of civil liberties. Striking the right balance will be challenging.
Disturbing to see journalists being arrested for covering a protest. The media plays a vital watchdog role, and their access shouldn’t be restricted without strong justification.
I agree. The arrest of journalists is a concerning development that merits close scrutiny. Protecting press freedom is essential in a healthy democracy.
This appears to be a complex case with competing interests at play. I hope the legal process can sort out the details and lead to a fair resolution.
Absolutely. It’s important that the rule of law is upheld, but not at the expense of constitutional rights. Finding the right balance is crucial.
Journalists being arrested for covering a protest is very concerning. The government needs to be extremely cautious about impeding the free press, even in sensitive situations.
Absolutely. The role of the media in reporting on protests and civil unrest is crucial. Their access shouldn’t be restricted without the clearest justification.
This seems like a heavy-handed crackdown on protesters exercising their First Amendment rights. I hope the authorities can find a way to balance public safety with protecting free speech.
I agree, the government response seems disproportionate. We should be careful not to let security concerns erode core civil liberties.