Listen to the article
Democrats Call for Trump’s Removal After Iran Threats, Senator Whitehouse Deems It “Unrealistic”
Dozens of congressional Democrats are demanding that Republicans take action to remove President Donald Trump following his latest threats against Iran, though one Democratic lawmaker believes such efforts are not currently “realistic.”
The calls for removal center on invoking the 25th Amendment, a constitutional provision that allows a president’s Cabinet to remove him from office if he is deemed unable to fulfill his duties. Democrats point to Trump’s recent posts on Truth Social—particularly one where he declared “a whole civilization will die tonight” unless his demands to reopen the Strait of Hormuz are met—as evidence that the president is unfit to serve as commander in chief.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) acknowledged concerns about Trump’s mental state but pushed back against the feasibility of removal. “I’m getting a lot of traffic about the 25th Amendment after Trump’s mad rants,” Whitehouse stated on social media platform X. “The president is facing serious mental decline; I’m with you on that.”
However, he continued, “Unfortunately, invoking the 25th is not realistic right now, given his oddball Cabinet of sycophants and eccentrics, and Republican ‘spines of foam.’ We’re going to have to buckle down and win this the old-fashioned way.”
For the 25th Amendment to be successfully invoked, Vice President JD Vance and a majority of Trump’s Cabinet would need to agree to remove him. They would then submit a declaration to Congress, which Trump would likely contest, triggering a requirement for a two-thirds vote in both chambers to permanently remove him from office.
This constitutional mechanism presents a much higher threshold than impeachment and conviction. Since its ratification in the 1960s, the 25th Amendment has only been used for temporary transfers of power during medical procedures requiring anesthesia or to fill vice-presidential vacancies—never for the involuntary removal of a sitting president.
The situation mirrors calls from congressional Republicans toward the end of Joe Biden’s presidency, particularly after his debate performance against Trump in the summer of 2024, when GOP lawmakers also suggested invoking the 25th Amendment.
Democratic lawmakers continue to express alarm over Trump’s rhetoric. Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) wrote on X, “If I were in Trump’s Cabinet, I would spend Easter calling constitutional lawyers about the 25th Amendment. This is completely, utterly unhinged. He’s already killed thousands. He’s going to kill thousands more.”
Some Democrats have also accused Trump of being on the verge of committing war crimes by threatening to target civilian infrastructure like power plants and bridges in Iran.
When questioned about whether such actions would constitute war crimes, Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) defended the president, stating, “No. It’s an ongoing operation, and if he needs leverage, he’s using that leverage.”
Many Republican lawmakers have remained silent on Trump’s statements. The White House had not responded to requests for comment at the time of reporting.
The escalating tensions with Iran and Trump’s ultimatum regarding the Strait of Hormuz have significant implications for global oil markets and regional stability in the Middle East. The strait is a critical chokepoint for international oil shipments, with approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply passing through it daily.
The ongoing situation represents one of the most serious foreign policy crises of Trump’s presidency, with potential ramifications for U.S. allies throughout the region and global energy security.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
The senator’s assessment of the 25th Amendment process being unrealistic is noteworthy. Even with concerns about Trump’s mental fitness, the political dynamics seem to be a major hurdle in pursuing this course of action.
I agree, the political landscape makes the 25th Amendment a challenging path forward. It’s a complex issue without easy solutions.
The Democratic calls for Trump’s removal following his Iran threats are understandable, but the senator’s comments on the 25th Amendment process being unrealistic are insightful. The political dynamics appear to be a significant obstacle.
You’re right, the 25th Amendment approach faces major hurdles given the current political environment. It’s a challenging situation without a clear path forward.
This situation with Trump’s Iran threats is concerning. While I understand the desire to remove him, the 25th Amendment process seems problematic based on the senator’s assessment. It’s a complex issue without easy solutions.
You’re right, the 25th Amendment is a difficult path forward. Invoking it would face major political obstacles at this point.
Removing the president through the 25th Amendment is an uphill battle, as Sen. Whitehouse points out. Even with concerns about Trump’s mental fitness, the process faces significant political hurdles.
I agree it seems unrealistic at this stage, given the partisan gridlock in Washington. The 25th Amendment is a high bar to clear.
The senator’s assessment of the 25th Amendment as an unrealistic option for removing Trump is noteworthy. Despite concerns about the president’s mental state, the political realities make invoking the amendment a difficult proposition.
Agreed, the political dynamics make the 25th Amendment a challenging path forward. It’s a complex issue without easy solutions.
The calls for Trump’s removal after his latest Iran comments are understandable, but as the senator notes, the 25th Amendment approach may not be realistic. The political dynamics make it a challenging proposition.
I’m curious to see how this plays out. The 25th Amendment option seems to face significant hurdles, as the senator indicates.
While the concerns about Trump’s mental state are valid, the senator’s assessment of the 25th Amendment process being unrealistic is noteworthy. The political realities make it a high bar to clear, it seems.
Agreed, the political landscape makes the 25th Amendment a tough sell at this stage. It’s a complex situation without easy solutions.
While the desire to remove Trump is understandable given his latest Iran threats, the senator’s comments on the 25th Amendment being unrealistic are important to consider. The political landscape appears to be a significant obstacle.
You make a fair point. The political realities surrounding the 25th Amendment make it a difficult proposition, as the senator suggests.