Listen to the article
The Trump administration’s recent proposal to allow Americans to tap into their 401(k) retirement plans for home purchases has drawn criticism from economists who argue it fails to address the root causes of America’s housing affordability crisis.
Experts point to two fundamental factors driving housing costs skyward: restrictive zoning laws and excessive regulatory policies that severely limit new construction. These constraints have created a supply shortage that keeps pushing home prices beyond the reach of many Americans.
“Anything that doesn’t answer the question, ‘Are we going to have more homes at the end of this?’ is going to be an insufficient response,” said Ben Harris, vice president and director of economic studies at the Brookings Institution, in an interview with Fox News Digital.
Harris noted that even regions that once saw robust home construction, such as Houston, parts of Florida, and Phoenix, have experienced significant slowdowns in recent years, contributing to rising prices nationwide.
Joseph Gyourko, a professor of real estate and finance at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, explained the systemic nature of the problem: “There are just many, many ways to halt and stop development, and we’ve gotten very, very good at it in the United States.”
The financial burden of these regulatory barriers is substantial. According to Jim Tobin, president and CEO of the National Association of Home Builders, approximately $94,000 of a new single-family home’s cost comes directly from regulations imposed by local, state, and federal governments.
“Time is money in real estate,” Tobin emphasized. When developers purchase land, they immediately begin paying taxes while waiting for approvals that can take months or years. During this period, construction costs continue to rise. Many municipalities also require developers to install basic infrastructure like sewers, water lines, roads, and electrical systems—expenses that ultimately get passed on to homebuyers.
California stands as perhaps the most striking example of how regulatory constraints can create severe housing shortages. The state’s environmental review laws, particularly the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impose significant hurdles for developers. This five-decade-old legislation requires extensive environmental reviews that frequently delay projects and substantially increase costs.
Wayne Winegarden, senior fellow in business and economics at the Pacific Research Institute, told Fox News Digital that California’s regulatory framework has created an “astronomical” housing shortfall of approximately one million homes. “That’s just basic economics,” Winegarden explained. “When supply is inadequate to demand, prices go up.”
The consequences are evident in California’s housing market, where the median home price is roughly double the national average, putting homeownership out of reach for many residents.
The connection between limited supply and high prices follows fundamental economic principles. When housing construction fails to keep pace with population growth and demand, buyers compete for a restricted inventory of homes, driving prices higher in bidding wars.
While several southern states and metropolitan areas once saw rapid housing development, regulatory barriers have increasingly slowed construction nationwide, contributing to the current affordability crisis.
Housing industry experts argue that meaningful solutions must focus on increasing the housing supply through zoning reforms and streamlining the regulatory approval process. Policy proposals that merely shift purchasing power—like allowing 401(k) withdrawals for down payments—may help some individual buyers in the short term but fail to address the structural supply problems driving the market.
For millions of Americans struggling to afford homes, the solution appears to require fundamental reforms to how communities approach development and construction—a challenge that crosses political boundaries and requires coordination across all levels of government. Without addressing these supply constraints, economists suggest that other housing affordability measures will likely fall short of making meaningful impact.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
13 Comments
Tapping 401(k)s for home purchases seems like a questionable idea that could undermine retirement savings. The real issue seems to be the lack of new housing supply due to zoning and regulations. Addressing those root causes would be a more sustainable solution.
Interesting to see economists pointing to the supply side as the core issue here. It makes sense that overly restrictive zoning and red tape are stifling new home building and fueling the affordability crisis. Curious to see what other policy solutions they propose.
Agreed, the supply-side dynamics seem to be the driving force behind rising home prices. Reforms to reduce regulatory barriers and enable more construction could be an effective approach.
The housing affordability crisis seems to stem from a fundamental imbalance between supply and demand. Tapping retirement savings may provide temporary relief, but the long-term solution requires tackling the root causes around zoning and construction rules. Curious to see what specific policy changes experts propose.
Agreed, the underlying issue is the lack of new housing supply. Policymakers should focus on reforms to zoning, permitting, and other regulations that are constraining construction and driving up prices.
This housing crisis highlights the need for a multi-faceted approach. Tapping 401(k)s may provide some relief, but the long-term answer lies in addressing the core drivers like restrictive zoning and excessive regulations. Policymakers need to get creative to boost the overall housing supply.
Well said. Tackling the root causes around construction barriers is key to creating a sustainable solution. Incremental steps like 401(k) withdrawals won’t fix the fundamental supply-demand imbalance.
Interesting that even regions with a history of robust home building are now seeing construction slowdowns. That really underscores how widespread and systemic the housing supply problem has become. 401(k) withdrawals seem like a short-term band-aid, not a real solution.
This housing crisis is a complex issue without easy solutions. Zoning and regulations do seem to be a major factor limiting new construction and driving up prices. Tapping 401(k)s may provide short-term relief, but it doesn’t address the underlying supply shortage.
You’re right, policymakers need to focus on increasing the overall housing supply rather than just Band-Aid solutions. Reforms to zoning and construction regulations could make a big difference.
It’s concerning to see the supply challenges persist even in regions that were once housing construction hubs. Clearly there are systemic regulatory barriers at play that need to be addressed. Creative solutions beyond just 401(k) withdrawals will be crucial.
This housing crisis has widespread implications beyond just home affordability. Limiting new construction also constrains economic growth and opportunity. Policymakers need to take a hard look at zoning and regulations that are stifling the housing market.
Absolutely, the ripple effects of the housing shortage are quite serious. Freeing up the ability to build more homes could boost economic activity and give more people a chance at homeownership.