Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In an unprecedented shift, local officials across the United States are now preparing for potential federal intervention in their jurisdictions, marking a dramatic deterioration in the relationship between different levels of government.

Denver Mayor Mike Johnston revealed that his administration now includes federal government actions in disaster preparedness planning. Traditionally focused on natural disasters and environmental hazards, Denver officials now simulate responses to potential federal interference with schools, hospitals, and elections.

“We used to prepare for natural disasters,” Johnston, a Democrat, said. “Now we prepare for our own federal government.”

This concern stems partly from President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops to certain U.S. cities last year despite opposition from local leaders. Denver, which the Trump administration has sued over limiting cooperation on deportations, sees itself as potentially vulnerable to similar federal actions.

At least half a dozen state and local officials from both parties describe an increasingly adversarial relationship with Washington that has reached new levels of tension following the killing of two U.S. citizens by federal agents in Minneapolis last month.

Jerry Dyer, the Republican mayor of Fresno, California, and a former police chief, described the situation as unprecedented. “I’ve never seen federal law enforcement come to the cities, whether it’s National Guard or ICE, and police cities without a level of cooperation from local police,” he said.

The dynamic has upended traditional political alignments. Republicans have historically championed states’ rights and limited federal power under the 10th Amendment. Now, a Republican president is asserting broader federal authority while Democrats advocate for local control.

“There’s no question that the Trump administration has repeatedly violated the Constitution and how it deals with states,” said Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, who hopes the nation is approaching a turning point similar to the end of McCarthyism.

President Trump has expressed frustration at what he sees as reflexive resistance from Democratic leaders, insisting he prefers cooperation with officials like Louisiana’s Republican Governor Jeff Landry, who requested National Guard troops for New Orleans.

Trump’s approach to federalism appears inconsistent across policy areas. He favors state authority on abortion and education while asserting stronger federal control over immigration and elections. His recent comment that Republicans should “nationalize” elections drew criticism even from Republican Senator Rand Paul, who noted, “That’s not what the Constitution says about elections.”

The tensions peaked following federal immigration operations in Minneapolis. While the administration has replaced ICE and Department of Homeland Security leaders there with border czar Tom Homan and withdrawn some officers, thousands remain. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey characterizes the situation as an “invasion” and “occupation,” while Trump refers to federal agents as “soldiers” and officials describe them as being “in theater.”

The impact extends beyond Minneapolis. Elizabeth Kautz, the Republican mayor of suburban Burnsville, Minnesota, now carries her passport within her own city, which she has led since 1995. “With the introduction of ICE, our cities are no longer safe,” she said.

Matt Tuerk, Democratic mayor of Allentown, Pennsylvania, notes that enforcement actions in Minnesota create fear in his city’s large Latino population despite no direct ICE presence there. “What I can’t tolerate is the approach to immigration operations in a place like Minneapolis that are causing people to look over their shoulder in cities like Allentown,” he said.

Local officials also face practical challenges as Washington cancels grants deemed wasteful or misaligned with administration priorities. Some mayors have turned to philanthropic sources to fill gaps, but as Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass noted, nothing can replace federal resources.

As tensions continue, local leaders find themselves in uncharted territory. Jim Hovland, the nonpartisan mayor of Edina, a Minneapolis suburb, expressed dismay at the deteriorating relationship: “You think about, ‘Why us?’ We’ve had a historically really good relationship with the federal government, and it’s really sad to see it fray.”

For Cincinnati Mayor Aftab Pureval, the change is profound. “Given that the administration has used partisan politics and used the power of the federal government and its various agencies to put pressure on mayors and local officials not to follow the law but to follow their politics is absolutely new and it’s absolutely affecting trust at every level.”

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

8 Comments

  1. The tensions between local and federal governments are certainly concerning. It’s critical that officials work together to address challenges rather than engage in adversarial tactics. Cooperative federalism is essential for effective governance.

    • Elijah Johnson on

      I agree, the deterioration of the federal-local relationship is troubling. Hopefully, leaders can find ways to bridge divides and work constructively on shared priorities.

  2. Oliver I. Garcia on

    This is a troubling development that speaks to the broader political polarization in the country. Restoring a more cooperative and constructive relationship between different levels of government should be a priority for policymakers across the aisle.

    • I agree, depoliticizing the federal-local dynamic is crucial. Focused on problem-solving rather than partisan posturing would go a long way.

  3. The aggressive tactics used by the Trump administration are certainly concerning and can undermine trust in government institutions. However, we should be cautious about overgeneralizing – the federal-local relationship is complex with nuances on both sides.

  4. While the federal government has an important oversight role, local officials are closest to their communities and often best positioned to address their unique needs and challenges. Finding the right balance is critical for effective governance.

  5. Isabella Moore on

    This story highlights the complexities of balancing local autonomy with federal oversight. While local leaders need flexibility, the federal government also has a role to play in ensuring national security and consistency. A collaborative approach is needed.

    • Well said. Navigating the federal-local dynamic is always a delicate balance. Both sides must be willing to compromise and find common ground for the good of the public.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.