Listen to the article
President Trump on Wednesday characterized New York City’s election of democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani as mayor as a dramatic leftward shift, telling a business audience in Miami that Democrats had “installed a communist” to lead America’s largest city.
“But the communists, Marxists, socialists and globalists had their chance, and they delivered nothing but disaster. And now let’s see how a communist does in New York. We’re going to see how that works out,” Trump said during a speech marking the one-year anniversary of his 2024 presidential victory.
The president used New York’s mayoral outcome to draw a stark contrast with his administration’s policies, framing the national political divide as “between communism and common sense.” He even suggested that Miami could become a sanctuary for “those fleeing communism in New York City,” a comment that drew approval from the business-friendly Florida audience.
Despite his criticism of the city’s political direction, Trump, who built his real estate empire in New York before moving his primary residence to Florida in 2019, expressed his continued affection for his hometown. “We’ll help them a little bit,” he said toward the end of his remarks, suggesting his administration wouldn’t abandon the city despite its leadership choice.
The comments come as New York City faces significant challenges, including persistent concerns about crime, housing affordability, and economic recovery following the pandemic. Many political analysts view Mamdani’s victory as part of a broader progressive wave in urban politics, though Trump’s characterization of the new mayor as a “communist” goes further than most mainstream political assessments.
During his wide-ranging address, Trump highlighted what he described as his administration’s economic accomplishments, claiming America is entering a “golden age” with “the strongest economy, the strongest borders, the strongest military.” He asserted that “trillions and trillions of dollars” are flowing back to the United States under his leadership.
The speech, delivered at the America Business Forum in Miami, underscored Trump’s continued focus on economic nationalism and his administration’s emphasis on domestic manufacturing and border security. These themes have remained central to his presidency since his return to office last year.
Trump’s criticism of New York echoes broader Republican concerns about progressive governance in major cities. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has similarly criticized Mamdani’s election, describing it as an “incredible act of ballistic podiatry” and predicting an exodus of New Yorkers to Florida. Since the pandemic, Florida has indeed seen significant migration from New York, with an estimated 150,000 former New Yorkers relocating to the Sunshine State.
The president’s comments also reflect the deepening urban-rural divide in American politics, with major cities increasingly embracing progressive leadership while suburban and rural areas trend more conservative. This political geography has been a defining feature of recent election cycles.
Trump, who developed iconic New York properties including Trump Tower and led the renovation of Central Park’s Wollman Ice Rink, has frequently pointed to what he characterizes as New York’s decline under Democratic leadership. Though he now calls Florida home, his identity remains intertwined with the city where he first rose to prominence.
“Every day my administration will fight, fight, fight, and America will win, win, win,” Trump concluded, reiterating his administration’s commitment to what he frames as common-sense governance in contrast to progressive urban policies.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for additional comment on the president’s remarks about New York City’s new mayor.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
While I’m no fan of Trump’s rhetoric, I do think he raises some valid concerns about the direction of NYC under a socialist mayor. Mamdani’s policies could have significant economic impacts, both positive and negative. Hopefully both sides can find common ground and work to address the city’s challenges pragmatically.
I agree, it’s important to look past the partisan posturing and evaluate Mamdani’s policies objectively. Reasonable people can disagree, but constructive dialogue is key to finding solutions that work for all New Yorkers.
Trump’s comments about NYC’s political shift to the left are clearly colored by his own conservative views. But he’s not wrong that Mamdani represents a significant ideological change for the city. Whether that’s good or bad remains to be seen – I’m curious to see how the new mayor’s tenure unfolds.
Trump’s comments about NYC becoming a ‘sanctuary’ for those ‘fleeing communism’ are quite provocative. Is he trying to stoke fears and division, or does he genuinely believe Mamdani’s policies will drive people out of the city? Either way, this type of inflammatory language is unlikely to help bridge the partisan divide.
Interesting to see Trump offering to ‘help’ NYC a bit, despite his criticism of the new mayor. Is this a genuine olive branch, or more political gamesmanship? Either way, I hope the city’s leaders can find ways to work across the aisle for the benefit of all New Yorkers.
Agreed. Partisan bickering rarely solves real-world problems. A pragmatic, problem-solving approach focused on results rather than ideology would serve the city best.
Trump’s critique of NYC’s new mayor-elect as a ‘communist’ seems a bit hyperbolic. While Mamdani has progressive views, we should withhold judgment and see how he governs. New York voters made their choice, and Trump would do well to respect the democratic process rather than inflame partisan tensions.
I agree, it’s important to give the new mayor a chance before rushing to judgment. Inflammatory rhetoric rarely leads to constructive solutions.
Interesting to see Trump offering ‘conditional support’ for the new NYC mayor. I wonder what that entails – perhaps a pragmatic attempt to work together despite political differences? Or is it just more posturing? Time will tell how this dynamic unfolds.
True, Trump’s offer of ‘conditional support’ is an intriguing olive branch. But the history of political tensions in NYC makes me skeptical of any genuine cooperation. We’ll have to wait and see if it amounts to more than just rhetoric.