Listen to the article
President Trump and NYC Mayor Mamdani Exchange Regular Text Messages in Surprising Political Alliance
President Donald Trump and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani have been maintaining a regular text correspondence since their November White House meeting, exchanging messages approximately twice a week, according to sources familiar with their communication.
The former Astoria lawmaker and the Queens native have developed what insiders describe as a “friendly” rapport, discussing topics ranging from the recent toppling of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro to zoning regulations affecting New York City real estate development.
“It wouldn’t make practical, political sense for them to scream at each other — in public or private,” one political insider told The Post, while noting that both politicians understand they “can’t appear too cozy” given their vastly different ideological backgrounds.
The unusual relationship between the conservative Republican president and the Democratic Socialist mayor represents a significant departure from the historically tense dynamics between the White House and New York City’s leadership. Even Mamdani’s predecessor, Eric Adams, who openly courted Trump’s favor and attended his inauguration earlier this year, reportedly had to rely on intermediaries to establish communication with the president.
Andrew Kirtzman, CEO of strategic communications firm KSX, characterized the relationship as “remarkable,” noting Trump’s comfort level with Mamdani despite their political differences.
“He hated (Bill) de Blasio, the last left-wing mayor, and probably felt estranged from the city because of it,” Kirtzman explained. “He seems to feel an emotional connection with Mamdani. The mayor must be totally amazed by what’s happening.”
Political observers suggest the relationship may be strategically advantageous for both parties. For Mamdani, maintaining cordial relations with the president could prove crucial for New York City’s financial interests. “Mamdani would be smart to kiss Trump’s ass,” one source bluntly stated, “especially when the federal government can withhold billions from the city.”
The dynamic is particularly noteworthy given Mamdani’s political base. As a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), he represents a constituency generally hostile to Trump’s policies and rhetoric. However, Kirtzman believes Mamdani’s supporters will likely understand the pragmatic nature of the relationship.
“I think the left understands this is purely transactional from Mamdani’s perspective,” Kirtzman said.
The two leaders first garnered attention for their unexpectedly cordial interaction during their Oval Office meeting in November. That initial encounter, which surprised political observers given their ideological differences, appears to have established a foundation for ongoing dialogue.
Their relationship exists against a backdrop of significant policy disagreements. Mamdani has publicly condemned some of Trump’s actions, including the recent capture of Venezuelan leader Maduro, which the mayor characterized as an “act of war.” He has also been critical of federal immigration enforcement activities in New York City.
Despite these public disagreements, the personal communication channel between the two leaders appears to remain open and functional, suggesting both men recognize the potential benefits of maintaining a working relationship despite their profound political differences.
For Trump, the relationship may offer insights into governing America’s largest city and potentially soften his image with urban voters. For Mamdani, direct access to the White House could prove invaluable in securing federal support for New York City initiatives and addressing the city’s significant financial challenges.
As this unlikely political relationship continues to develop, it remains to be seen how it might influence policy decisions affecting both New York City and the broader national political landscape.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
This is an unusual political alliance, but it makes sense that they would try to find areas of common ground rather than clashing publicly. Maintaining open communication lines, even between ideological opponents, can lead to more pragmatic and productive governance.
Agreed. Building personal relationships across the aisle, even in a polarized political climate, can sometimes lead to more effective policymaking. It will be interesting to see how this dynamic evolves over time.
I’m intrigued by the prospect of Trump and Mamdani exchanging ideas, especially around issues like mining, energy, and infrastructure. Their differing ideological leanings could lead to some creative problem-solving if they’re willing to listen to each other and make reasonable compromises.
That’s an insightful point. With open and honest dialogue, they may be able to find innovative solutions that neither side could have achieved alone. It will be interesting to see if this partnership can yield tangible results in these key policy areas.
As someone interested in mining and energy issues, I’m curious to know if Trump and Mamdani have discussed topics related to those industries in their private exchanges. Their differing views on regulation and development could lead to some interesting policy discussions.
That’s a good question. Given their backgrounds, I imagine mining, energy, and infrastructure topics have come up in their conversations. It will be worth following any potential collaboration or compromises in those areas.
I’m skeptical about the depth and sincerity of this friendship between Trump and Mamdani. While regular communication is good, I worry this could just be political theater or an attempt to score points with certain voters. Concrete policy outcomes would be a better measure of its significance.
That’s a fair point. We’ll need to see tangible results from this partnership before drawing conclusions about its true impact. Actions will speak louder than words when it comes to assessing the substance of their relationship.
This is an unexpected political alliance, but not necessarily a bad thing. If Trump and Mamdani can find ways to work together productively, even on a limited set of issues, it could help break partisan gridlock and deliver results for their constituents. I’ll be curious to see what comes of this relationship.
Agreed. While their partnership may seem unlikely, any effort to bridge the divide and find common ground should be encouraged. Pragmatic policymaking that benefits the public is what ultimately matters, regardless of party affiliation.
Interesting to see an unexpected friendship between Trump and Mamdani. Given their different political leanings, it’s surprising they’ve found common ground to regularly exchange messages. I wonder what specific topics they’re discussing and how this alliance might impact national and local politics.
Yes, it’s quite an intriguing partnership. I’m curious to learn more about the specific issues they’re aligning on, and how this could shape future policy decisions.