Listen to the article
Treasury Department Terminates Union Agreements at IRS and Fiscal Service Bureau
In a significant escalation of the Trump administration’s efforts to reshape federal labor relations, the Treasury Department has terminated collective bargaining agreements with unionized workers at the Internal Revenue Service and the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, officials confirmed Friday.
The decision affects thousands of federal employees represented by the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), one of the largest federal employee unions in the country with approximately 150,000 members across 37 government agencies. Treasury officials cited President Donald Trump’s March 2023 executive order as the legal basis for ending the agreements.
In a letter distributed to IRS employees on Friday, IRS Chief Human Capital Officer Alex Kweskin framed the termination as a positive organizational change, stating it “deepens our commitment of operating as one IRS, a collaborative team focused on serving American taxpayers.”
The move follows recent guidance from Scott Kupor, director of the Office of Personnel Management, who issued a memorandum earlier this month directing agency heads to comply with Trump’s executive order by terminating applicable collective bargaining agreements with federal worker unions, explicitly mentioning the NTEU.
Labor relations experts view this development as part of a broader strategy by the administration to fundamentally alter the relationship between federal agencies and their unionized workforces. The executive order has been controversial since its signing, with unions arguing it undermines decades of established labor protections for government employees.
The NTEU had previously challenged Trump’s executive order in federal court, resulting in a preliminary injunction against its implementation. However, that injunction was stayed pending appeal, creating legal uncertainty. The Treasury Department’s action appears to have been emboldened by a recent decision from a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in a separate case, which effectively cleared the way for implementing the executive order.
Doreen Greenwald, president of the NTEU, strongly contested the termination’s legality in a statement issued Friday. “The IRS cannot unilaterally end its contract with the labor union,” Greenwald asserted, citing federal sector labor statutes that require the agency to maintain a collective bargaining agreement “with the exclusive representative of its bargaining unit employees.”
The Bureau of the Fiscal Service, which handles critical government payment processing operations, has also seen its union agreement terminated, according to sources familiar with the situation who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the matter publicly.
This development has significant implications for tax administration and government operations. The IRS, currently implementing major reforms under the Inflation Reduction Act funding, relies on thousands of unionized employees to process tax returns, conduct audits, and manage taxpayer services. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service plays a crucial but often overlooked role in ensuring government payments—including Social Security benefits, tax refunds, and federal employee salaries—are processed correctly and on time.
Labor relations at these agencies have historically been contentious at times, with disputes over working conditions, performance metrics, and employee rights. However, the collective bargaining agreements provided a framework for resolving these issues through established procedures.
The termination of these agreements creates uncertainty about how workplace disputes, employee discipline, and other labor matters will be handled going forward. It also raises questions about potential impacts on agency operations during the upcoming tax filing season, when the IRS faces its heaviest workload.
As the legal battle continues, federal employees at these agencies find themselves caught in a power struggle between the administration’s workforce agenda and unions fighting to preserve collective bargaining rights that have been in place for decades.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
I’m not surprised to see this, given the administration’s history of anti-union actions. But I’m worried about the effects on vital government services like tax collection and financial management.
As someone who relies on the services of the IRS and Fiscal Service, I hope this doesn’t lead to disruptions or reduced quality of work. Curious to hear more about the rationale behind this decision.
Me too. Effective tax collection and financial management are crucial for the functioning of government. I worry this could have unintended negative consequences for taxpayers.
While I understand the desire for organizational efficiency, I hope this doesn’t come at the expense of worker protections and collective bargaining rights. Those are important safeguards.
This seems like a concerning escalation of the administration’s efforts to weaken federal labor unions. Curious to hear more perspectives on the potential impacts on service quality and worker rights.
I agree, it’s a concerning development. The stated goal of ‘operating as one team’ seems like corporate-speak to justify reducing worker protections.
This seems like a politically motivated move rather than one focused on improving operations. I hope the unions are able to challenge this decision and protect workers’ rights.
Interesting move by the Treasury Department. I wonder how this will impact the day-to-day operations and morale of IRS and Fiscal Service workers. Curious to see how the union responds.
I’m concerned about the potential impact on employee morale and retention. Dismantling union contracts could make it harder for these agencies to attract and keep qualified staff.