Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Thousands Stage Nationwide Walkout Protesting Immigration Policies on Trump’s One-Year Anniversary

Thousands of Americans took to the streets Tuesday in a coordinated nationwide walkout protesting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), marking exactly one year since Donald Trump began his second presidential term.

The “Free America Walkout,” organized by the Women’s March—the same group that mobilized millions against Trump’s first administration in 2017—saw participants leave schools, workplaces, and businesses around 2 p.m. local time in cities across the country.

Video footage captured demonstrators converging in major metropolitan areas including Atlanta, New York City, Minneapolis, and Washington, D.C. In New York, protesters marched to Trump Tower, chanting and displaying signs calling for changes to federal immigration policies.

“One year into Trump’s second regime, we face an escalating fascist threat: ICE raids on our communities, troops occupying our cities, families torn apart, attacks on our trans siblings, mass surveillance, and terror used to keep us silent,” the Women’s March stated on its website. “It is time for our communities to escalate as well.”

The protests come amid heightened tensions surrounding immigration enforcement. Trump’s administration has deployed thousands of additional ICE agents and federal personnel to major cities as part of an intensified immigration crackdown, a move critics say has created fear in immigrant communities.

Demonstrators were particularly galvanized by recent incidents involving ICE operations, including the fatal shooting of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent during an enforcement operation in Minneapolis. This incident has intensified scrutiny of the administration’s use of force in immigration enforcement actions.

In several locations, high school students participated despite snowy conditions, demonstrating political engagement despite being too young to vote. School administrators in some districts had prepared for the walkouts, with principals notifying parents and arranging supervision for participating students, according to local news reports.

Organizers strategically chose a weekday for maximum impact, noting on their website that “a walkout interrupts business as usual. It makes visible how much our labor, participation, and cooperation are taken for granted—and what happens when we withdraw them together.”

The demonstrations appeared largely peaceful across the country, with protesters filling streets and public spaces in an orderly manner. The coordinated nature of the protest—occurring simultaneously across time zones—amplified its visibility and message.

This event represents the latest chapter in the ongoing tension between the Trump administration’s hardline immigration policies and immigration advocates. The Women’s March has maintained its position as a significant organizing force for progressive causes since its initial demonstrations in 2017, which attracted millions of participants and were considered among the largest single-day protests in U.S. history.

The “Free America” movement frames its opposition not merely as disagreement with policy but as resistance to what organizers characterize as increasingly authoritarian governance. By encouraging participants to “withhold our labor, our participation, and our consent,” the movement employs civil disobedience tactics reminiscent of historical labor and civil rights movements.

The protests come as immigration remains one of the most divisive issues in American politics. Trump’s second term has seen the administration double down on restrictive immigration policies that defined his first presidency, including expanded deportation operations, increased border security, and stricter enforcement measures against undocumented immigrants.

As demonstrations continued into the evening in some locations, organizers indicated this walkout represents just one component of a broader resistance strategy that will continue throughout Trump’s second term.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

16 Comments

  1. Isabella D. Lee on

    The reported numbers suggest this was a sizeable nationwide protest. I wonder what impact, if any, it will have on the political landscape and policy discussions going forward.

    • Jennifer Thomas on

      That’s a good question. Sustained civic engagement can influence the political process, though the ultimate outcomes remain to be seen.

  2. While I may have reservations about some of the protesters’ tactics or demands, I respect their right to voice their concerns publicly.

    • Isabella Martinez on

      That’s a fair perspective. Constructive criticism and openness to different viewpoints can lead to better solutions.

  3. Interesting to see the continued protests against the current administration’s policies. While views may differ, open dialogue and civic engagement are important for a healthy democracy.

    • Oliver Williams on

      I agree, peaceful protest is a fundamental right. However, it’s important that the discourse remains civil and constructive on all sides.

  4. This is a complex and divisive issue. I’m curious to hear more perspectives on the root causes and potential solutions that could address the underlying concerns.

    • Valid points. Finding common ground and nuanced policy solutions will likely require good-faith efforts from all stakeholders.

  5. This is a charged political issue with strong feelings on both sides. I hope the discussions can remain constructive and solutions-oriented.

    • Agreed. Focusing on common ground and pragmatic policy options may be more productive than entrenched positions.

  6. Liam P. Rodriguez on

    While I may not agree with all the protesters’ demands, I appreciate the passion and commitment to their cause. Healthy debate is vital for a democracy.

    • Olivia W. Garcia on

      Well said. Even when we disagree, respecting each other’s right to express their views peacefully is important.

  7. Oliver Johnson on

    The protest seems to be a continuation of the resistance movement against the current administration. I’m curious to see how this plays out in the coming months.

    • Michael Rodriguez on

      It will be interesting to monitor how these protests and political dynamics evolve over time. Maintaining civil discourse is key.

  8. Patricia Thompson on

    This protest highlights the deep divisions in the country. I hope both sides can find ways to engage in meaningful dialogue and seek common ground.

    • Elizabeth Taylor on

      Agreed. Bridging divides and working towards compromise will be crucial, even if it’s challenging in the current political climate.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.