Listen to the article
The Kennedy Center in Washington swiftly installed former President Donald Trump’s name alongside John F. Kennedy’s on the iconic performing arts venue Friday, just one day after the center’s board of trustees unanimously approved the controversial change.
Workers hidden behind blue tarps on scaffolding quickly executed the transformation, revealing the building’s new designation: “The Donald J. Trump and The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.”
The board of trustees, which is currently chaired by Trump himself and composed of his appointees, justified the decision by citing Trump’s efforts to revitalize the institution. However, the move has sparked significant backlash from multiple quarters, including Democratic members of Congress who serve as ex-officio board members and historians who question the legality of the action.
Ray Smock, former House historian, emphasized that the naming of the Kennedy Center was established by federal law in 1964. “To change the name would require a revision of that 1964 law,” Smock explained. “The Kennedy Center board is not a lawmaking entity. Congress makes laws.”
The original legislation explicitly designated the center as a living memorial to President Kennedy following his assassination in 1963. Legal experts point out that the law contains specific prohibitions against the board of trustees converting the center into a memorial for any other person or placing another individual’s name on the building’s exterior.
The Kennedy family has responded with strong opposition to the renaming. Kerry Kennedy, niece of John F. Kennedy, expressed her disapproval in a pointed social media post on X (formerly Twitter). Alongside a photo of the center’s new name, she wrote: “Three years and one month from today, I’m going to grab a pickax and pull those letters off that building, but I’m going to need help holding the ladder. Are you in?” She added, “Applying for my carpenter’s card today, so it’ll be a union job!!!”
This renaming represents the latest in a series of Washington institutions to bear Trump’s name during his administration. Recently, the U.S. Institute of Peace was similarly renamed after the president, establishing a pattern that critics view as an inappropriate personalization of public institutions.
The controversy highlights tensions between executive authority and legislative intent, raising questions about the proper procedures for naming national monuments and memorials. Cultural institutions like the Kennedy Center hold deep symbolic value in American civic life, and changes to their identity inevitably touch on sensitive questions of historical legacy and political legitimacy.
The original Kennedy Center designation came at a moment of national mourning and represented a bipartisan effort to honor a slain president. The center has since become one of the nation’s premier performing arts venues, hosting prestigious events including the Kennedy Center Honors, which recognize lifetime artistic achievements.
When contacted by reporters, Kennedy Center officials did not respond to requests for comment about the name change or the legal questions surrounding it. The lack of response leaves open questions about how the institution plans to address the growing controversy.
As Washington navigates this latest development, the dispute underscores broader debates about presidential legacy, institutional tradition, and the proper balance between honoring past and present leadership. The Kennedy Center, with its prominent position both physically and culturally in the nation’s capital, now stands as a visible symbol of these ongoing tensions in American public life.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
I’m quite skeptical of the board’s justification for this move. Claiming it’s to recognize Trump’s efforts to ‘revitalize’ the institution rings hollow. This feels more like a partisan political stunt than a thoughtful honoring of the Kennedy legacy.
Agreed, the board’s reasoning seems flimsy. Unilaterally renaming a congressionally-established memorial is highly problematic and warrants a thorough investigation.
This decision by the Kennedy Center board is deeply troubling. Memorials should not be subject to partisan rebranding. I hope Congress intervenes to ensure the integrity of the JFK memorial is preserved, as originally intended.
Absolutely. Protecting the legacy and purpose of national memorials transcends political divisions. Congress must assert its rightful authority in this case.
This is a concerning development that raises serious legal and ethical questions. The Kennedy Center was created to honor JFK, not serve as a political plaything. I hope Congress steps in to protect the original intent and intention of the memorial.
Me too. Maintaining the integrity of national memorials and public institutions should be a non-partisan issue. Congress needs to assert its authority here.
This seems like a highly controversial and questionable decision by the Kennedy Center’s board. Renaming a memorial established by Congress without proper legal authorization sets a troubling precedent. It’s important to respect the intent and legacy of the original JFK memorial.
I agree, the board’s actions appear to be overstepping their authority. Congress should intervene to ensure the memorial’s original purpose is upheld.
Renaming the Kennedy Center to include Trump’s name is highly questionable and disrespectful to the original intent behind the memorial. The board’s actions seem to be more about politics than honoring the legacy of JFK. This warrants serious scrutiny.
I agree. The board’s decision appears to be overstepping its authority and undermining the fundamental purpose of the Kennedy Center memorial. Congress should intervene to restore the original designation.
Regardless of one’s political views, this move by the Kennedy Center board sets a dangerous precedent. Memorials and public spaces should not be subject to partisan rebranding on a whim. I hope cooler heads prevail and the original designation is restored.
Well said. Preserving the sanctity of national memorials is crucial. The board’s actions undermine the Kennedy Center’s purpose and legacy.
While I understand the desire to honor past presidents, the Kennedy Center was specifically created to commemorate JFK’s legacy. Unilaterally adding Trump’s name seems inappropriate and disrespectful to the original intent. This warrants further scrutiny and debate.
Absolutely. The Kennedy Center board should not be able to make such a significant change without Congressional approval. It sets a worrying precedent.
While I understand the desire to recognize past presidents, the Kennedy Center was specifically created to honor JFK. Unilaterally adding Trump’s name, without Congressional approval, is highly questionable and disrespectful to the original intent.
I agree. This appears to be a blatant abuse of power by the board. They have no authority to fundamentally alter a congressionally-established memorial.