Listen to the article
Senate Deadlocks on Health Care Reform as House Republicans Unveil Alternative Plan
The Senate’s failure to advance health care legislation this week has shifted attention to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson revealed a Republican alternative plan Friday, just days before enhanced Affordable Care Act tax subsidies are set to expire.
Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, has been working behind closed doors to assemble a package addressing health care costs as the House winds down its 2025 session. “House Republicans are tackling the real drivers of health care costs to provide affordable care,” Johnson said in a statement, announcing that the package would be voted on next week.
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries quickly condemned the proposal, calling it “toxic legislation that is completely unserious, hurts hardworking American taxpayers and is not designed to secure bipartisan support.” Jeffries vowed to “strongly oppose” the bill should it reach the House floor.
Time is running short for congressional action. Democrats forced the longest federal government shutdown in history this fall in an unsuccessful attempt to bring Republicans to the negotiating table on health care. But legislative efforts remain stalled after the Senate failed this week to advance either a Republican health care plan or the Democratic proposal to extend the tax credits for three years.
The 100-plus page House Republican package focuses on expanding access to employer-sponsored health insurance and regulating pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). It would broaden access to association health plans, allowing more small businesses and self-employed individuals to band together to purchase coverage. Supporters argue this approach gives businesses greater leverage to negotiate lower rates, while critics warn these plans typically offer less comprehensive coverage than what the ACA requires.
The proposal also imposes stricter data reporting requirements on PBMs, which have faced criticism for inflating costs and squeezing independent pharmacies. Additionally, the plan includes cost-sharing reductions for some lower-income people who rely on Obamacare, though these wouldn’t take effect until January 2027.
Notably absent from the Republican package is an extension of the enhanced tax credits that millions of Americans currently receive through the Affordable Care Act. These subsidies, implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, expire December 31. Without an extension, most families enrolled in ACA plans will see their out-of-pocket premiums more than double, with some facing even steeper increases.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly promised Republicans would develop a better alternative to the Affordable Care Act but has offered few specifics beyond suggesting stipends to help Americans purchase insurance. “I want to see the billions of dollars go to people, not to the insurance companies,” Trump said at a White House event Friday. “And I want to see the people go out and buy themselves great healthcare.”
Trump’s approach appears to favor direct payments to Americans rather than extending the existing ACA tax credits. The Senate Republican proposal that failed to advance would have provided annual payments of $1,000 for adult enrollees (or $1,500 for those aged 50-64) into new health savings accounts. The House GOP plan does not appear to include such provisions.
The current impasse leaves vulnerable House Republicans from competitive districts in a difficult position. A group of moderate GOP lawmakers is now aligning with Democrats to advance proposals that would temporarily extend the tax credits to prevent Americans from facing sudden increases in healthcare costs.
These centrists are pursuing multiple strategies, including co-sponsoring bills and signing discharge petitions that could force floor votes if they gain majority support. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) has filed one such petition, which had secured signatures from 12 Republicans and 12 Democrats as of Friday afternoon. His bill would extend subsidies for two years while adding provisions to combat fraud in the ACA marketplace and impose restrictions on PBMs.
Another discharge petition from Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) has garnered 39 bipartisan signatures and would force a vote on a one-year ACA subsidy extension with new income caps. Meanwhile, Democrats are advancing their own discharge petition with 214 signatures, which would provide a clean three-year extension without additional provisions.
Jeffries has indicated Democrats are “actively reviewing” the bipartisan discharge petitions and will announce their position early next week. However, Senate Republicans made clear this week that a three-year extension without program modifications would not pass their chamber, suggesting a compromise solution remains elusive as the deadline approaches.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
This seems like another partisan clash in Congress. I wish our representatives would put aside their differences and focus on practical solutions that work for all Americans, not just their base. Reasonable compromise is key.
As an investor, I’ll be watching this debate closely to see how it could impact health care stocks and the broader market. Reducing costs is important, but not at the expense of critical patient protections.
This is a complex challenge with no easy answers. I appreciate the House GOP making an effort, but I’m concerned about the potential impact on coverage and affordability. Bipartisanship and pragmatism will be essential to get this right.
The political divide on health care reform is concerning. I hope cooler heads can prevail and the two sides can find common ground to improve affordability and access without undermining essential benefits.
Health care reform is a minefield, but I’m glad to see the House GOP offering an alternative plan. Even if the details are controversial, it’s important to have a robust debate and find the best path forward.
Interesting to see the House GOP put forth their own health care plan. It will be important to examine the details and how it compares to the current ACA provisions. Bipartisanship will be key to finding a lasting solution.
This is a complex issue without easy answers. While I appreciate the GOP trying to address rising costs, I’m concerned about the potential impact on coverage and access to care. Hopefully both parties can work together to find a balanced approach.
As an independent voter, I’m disappointed to see the partisan bickering continue on this critical issue. I hope the leaders in Congress can put aside their differences and find a workable solution that puts people over politics.