Listen to the article
In a sharp rebuke, the Department of Homeland Security has criticized Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for their refusal to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement efforts, escalating tensions between federal and local authorities in the state.
According to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, federal agents have arrested approximately 10,000 undocumented immigrants in Minneapolis in recent months. Noem publicly accused Walz and Frey of choosing to “protect criminals” rather than their constituents.
“We have arrested over 10,000 criminal illegal aliens who were killing Americans, hurting children and reigning terror in Minneapolis because Tim Walz and Jacob Frey refuse to protect their own people and instead protect criminals,” Noem wrote on the social media platform X.
Minneapolis maintains its status as a sanctuary jurisdiction, where local law enforcement agencies do not honor federal detainers for undocumented immigrants. This policy has become a focal point of contention between state and federal authorities amid an ongoing immigration crackdown.
The DHS has formally called on Governor Walz and Mayor Frey to begin honoring arrest detainers, stating: “We are calling on [Walz] and [Frey] to stop releasing criminal illegal aliens from Minnesota’s jails to re-perpetuate their crimes. ICE has more than 1,360 arrest detainers for the criminal illegal aliens in their custody.”
The agency added: “It is common sense. Criminal illegal aliens should not be released back onto our streets to terrorize more innocent Americans.”
The dispute comes amid heightened tensions in Minneapolis, where protests against federal law enforcement have intensified. Federal officers began a significant operation in Minnesota in early January as part of an investigation into a sweeping fraud case. The operation has resulted in dozens of arrests, predominantly affecting members of Minneapolis’ substantial Somali community.
Public sentiment toward the federal immigration enforcement efforts deteriorated further on January 7, when a federal officer fatally shot a protester named Renee Good during an encounter. Federal officials maintain that Good used her vehicle as a weapon against the agent, who they claim acted in self-defense when discharging his weapon.
The incident has fueled criticism from Democratic officials and community members who have characterized the shooting as a “murder” while voicing opposition to the administration’s deportation initiatives.
Mayor Frey has publicly rejected the Trump administration’s characterization of the immigration enforcement operation. During a recent appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Frey argued that the surge of federal agents has made residents feel targeted rather than protected.
“This is not about safety. What this is about is coming into our city by the thousands and terrorizing people simply because they’re Latino or Somali,” Frey said. “People in Minneapolis are speaking up. They’re speaking up peacefully. They’re standing up for their neighbors. And this is not just about resisting Trump. This is about loving and caring for the people that call this city home.”
The conflict highlights broader national tensions over immigration policy and enforcement, with sanctuary jurisdictions like Minneapolis increasingly at odds with federal authorities. The dispute also reflects deeper political divisions, as the Trump administration has made strict immigration enforcement a cornerstone of its domestic agenda.
As protests continue in Minneapolis, community leaders have expressed concerns about the impact of heightened enforcement activities on immigrant communities, particularly among Somali residents who form a significant demographic in the city.
The DHS maintains that its operations target individuals who pose public safety threats, while local officials argue that aggressive enforcement tactics undermine community trust and cooperation with law enforcement.
This standoff between federal and local authorities in Minnesota exemplifies the complex interplay between immigration policy, public safety concerns, and community relations that continues to challenge municipalities across the country.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
Interesting situation with the clash between federal and local authorities over immigration enforcement. It’s a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. I’m curious to learn more about the data and perspectives behind the DHS’s criticisms of Walz and Frey’s policies.
Yes, this is a contentious topic that highlights the ongoing debate around sanctuary cities and immigration policies. It will be important to see how this plays out between the state and federal government.
This clash over immigration enforcement and sanctuary city policies is a longstanding issue. I think it’s important to hear out the concerns of both the federal government and the state/local officials, and try to find a balanced approach that respects the rule of law while also protecting immigrant communities.
Well said. These are complex matters without easy solutions. Constructive dialogue and compromise will be needed to address the competing interests at play.
The DHS claim of 10,000 arrests of ‘criminal illegal aliens’ in Minneapolis is a striking statistic. I’d be interested to understand more about the specifics of those cases and the reasoning behind Walz and Frey’s decisions. There are usually nuances to these immigration enforcement disputes.
Absolutely, the details behind those arrest numbers will be crucial in assessing the validity of the DHS’s criticisms. Local and federal authorities often have different priorities and approaches when it comes to immigration.
The DHS’s claims about ‘criminal illegal aliens’ and ‘killing Americans’ seem rather inflammatory. I’d want to see more objective data and evidence to back up those assertions before drawing conclusions. Immigration is a sensitive topic, and both sides need to be careful with their rhetoric.
Agreed, the language used by DHS does seem overly charged. A more measured, fact-based approach would be more constructive in addressing these policy differences.
This dispute over immigration enforcement highlights the ongoing tensions between federal, state, and local authorities. While I understand the DHS’s concerns, I think Walz and Frey also have valid reasons for their sanctuary city policies. Hopefully they can find a middle ground that balances public safety and protects immigrant communities.