Listen to the article
Bipartisan Lawmakers Push to Overturn Trump’s Federal Union Executive Order
In a rare display of bipartisan cooperation, House lawmakers are actively lobbying their Senate colleagues to advance legislation that would reverse a Trump-era executive order affecting federal worker unions. The bill recently cleared the House with support from 20 Republican lawmakers, a significant achievement in today’s polarized political environment.
Representative Jared Golden (D-Maine), who spearheaded the House effort, told reporters in an exclusive interview that union collective bargaining rights transcend party lines. “The greatest evidence of that is union members themselves. They vote Democrat, they vote Republican. They don’t all vote, but they might vote if they knew that someone supported their collective bargaining rights,” Golden said.
Golden introduced the bill in April, with Senator Mark Warner (D-Virginia) bringing forward a companion version in the Senate this September. The Senate legislation has already garnered support from two Republican senators – Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine – with Collins reportedly signing on after the House passage on Thursday evening.
“I didn’t talk to her last night, but I’m really glad to see her on. It’s not a surprise to me. She’s supported unions on certain issues in the past,” said Golden, who previously worked for Collins before his election to Congress. This connection highlights the importance of cross-chamber relationships in advancing legislation in Washington.
The House victory came through an unusual procedural maneuver. Golden filed a discharge petition, a rarely successful tactic designed to force a vote on legislation over the wishes of leadership. The petition received signatures from five House Republicans along with 213 Democrats – Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pennsylvania), Rob Bresnahan (R-Pennsylvania), Don Bacon (R-Nebraska), Mike Lawler (R-New York), and Nick LaLota (R-New York).
Golden indicated that his Senate lobbying efforts are not a solo mission. He’s working alongside Representative Fitzpatrick, a moderate Republican who championed the bill in the House. “It’s important to do it in a way that’s bipartisan, to create space for members of both parties to work together,” Golden explained.
The Maine congressman expects more Republican senators to support the legislation in the coming days. He specifically mentioned Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) as someone who has “shown himself to be pro-labor” through previous legislative efforts. Earlier this year, Hawley introduced bipartisan legislation aimed at speeding up the labor contract process for new unions, which received endorsement from Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien.
Warner, the Senate sponsor, believes the House momentum strengthens their position. “The bipartisan momentum in the House only strengthens our hand in the Senate, and I intend to build on it,” Warner stated.
Despite this optimism, the bill faces significant hurdles in the Senate. It currently sits in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, chaired by Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), who has introduced several right-to-work bills throughout his career, indicating potential opposition to the pro-union measure.
Critics of the bill, primarily Republicans, argue that federal workers’ unions differ fundamentally from private sector labor unions. They contend that collective bargaining represents a different scenario when negotiating with elected officials rather than for-profit companies.
The legislative push highlights the complex political dynamics surrounding labor rights in America. While traditional party lines often dictate positions on union issues, this bill demonstrates that labor policy can occasionally transcend partisan divisions, particularly when championed by lawmakers from regions with strong union traditions.
As the bill moves forward, its fate will largely depend on whether Golden, Fitzpatrick, and Warner can convince additional Republican senators to support the measure, potentially setting up a significant labor policy shift as the current administration prepares for transition.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
This is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. I’m curious to hear more about the specifics of the bill and how it would impact federal agencies and budgets. Transparency and balanced policymaking will be key.
While I’m glad to see Republicans joining Democrats on this, I hope the Senate goes further and not just reverses the Trump order but enacts stronger protections for federal union rights. Workers deserve a voice, regardless of political affiliation.
I agree. Unions play a vital role in ensuring workers have a say and fair treatment. Bipartisan support for strengthening those rights is an encouraging sign.
This is an interesting development in the ongoing political battle over federal worker unions. It’s encouraging to see bipartisan cooperation on this issue, as collective bargaining rights shouldn’t be a partisan matter. I’m curious to see how this plays out in the Senate.
Collective bargaining is a fundamental right for workers, so I’m encouraged to see Republicans join Democrats on this issue. However, the details will be crucial – I hope they can craft a bill that effectively protects union rights without causing undue disruption.
Well said. Balancing worker protections with practical government operations will require thoughtful compromise. I’m cautiously optimistic the Senate can find that middle ground.
While I support the goal of strengthening federal union rights, I have some concerns about the specifics of this bill and how it could affect government efficiency and costs. I hope the Senate takes a balanced approach that respects workers without creating unintended consequences.
This is an important issue that goes beyond party lines. Federal workers deserve a voice, but the impacts on agencies and budgets need to be carefully considered. I’ll be following this closely to see how the debate unfolds in the Senate.
As someone who values the role of unions, I’m glad to see this bipartisan effort. At the same time, I hope lawmakers carefully consider the practical implications and find a solution that works for both workers and the government. Nuance will be important.