Listen to the article
Senate Passes Key Funding Package as Congress Races to Complete Budget
Congress took a significant step toward fully funding the federal government Thursday as the Senate overwhelmingly approved a three-bill spending package with a bipartisan 82-15 vote. The legislation now heads to President Donald Trump for his signature, marking the halfway point in Congress’s effort to pass all 12 annual appropriations bills before the January 30 deadline.
The package provides full-year funding for several major federal agencies, including the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Interior, and Justice. This progress substantially reduces the risk of disruption should lawmakers fail to meet the end-of-month deadline for the remaining agencies.
“Our goal, Mr. President is to get all of these bills signed into law. No continuing resolutions that lock in previous priorities and don’t reflect today’s realities,” said Sen. Susan Collins, the Republican chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee. “No more disastrous government shutdowns that are totally unnecessary and so harmful.”
The current deadline emerged from a funding patch that ended a 43-day government shutdown in November, and lawmakers from both parties have expressed determination to avoid another lapse in federal funding.
The House’s approval of a separate two-bill package this week brings Congress closer to completing all appropriations bills within the next two weeks. However, significant challenges remain, particularly funding for the Department of Homeland Security amid heightened tensions following an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent’s shooting of a Minnesota woman.
Immigration Enforcement Becomes Central Sticking Point
The Department of Homeland Security funding bill has become the most contentious piece of the remaining budget legislation. House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole announced that plans to bring the bill to the floor this week were postponed to “buy some time” as lawmakers grapple with the fallout from the Minneapolis shooting.
Last week, an ICE officer shot and killed Renee Good in an incident federal officials described as self-defense but which the Minneapolis mayor characterized as reckless and unnecessary. The shooting has intensified criticism of Trump’s deportation crackdown, which has focused heavily on cities in Democratic-leaning states.
Protests erupted in Minneapolis following the shooting, with demonstrators gathering at the Bishop Whipple Federal Building. The situation escalated when federal immigration officers deployed tear gas to disperse the crowd.
Democrats Demand Immigration Enforcement Reforms
House Democrats are seeking significant changes to ICE operations as a condition for approving Homeland Security funding. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, emphasized the need for “guardrails” on ICE funding.
“We can’t deal with the lawlessness and terrorizing of communities,” DeLauro said. “We’re going back and forth with offers, and that’s where we are.”
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries outlined potential reforms: “There are a variety of different things that can be done that we have put on the table and will continue to put on the table to get ICE under control so that they are actually conducting themselves like every other law enforcement agency in the country, as opposed to operating as if they’re above the law.”
The Congressional Progressive Caucus, representing nearly 100 Democratic members, has formally announced opposition to any funding for immigration enforcement agencies within DHS “unless there are meaningful and significant reforms to immigration enforcement practices.”
Some Democrats have proposed requiring ICE agents to wear body cameras, while approximately 70 members have signed onto an effort to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
Limited Options for Resolution
Chairman Cole indicated that any changes to the Homeland Security funding bill would require White House approval. One potential solution might involve allowing Democrats a separate vote on the Homeland Security bill, which, if passed, could then be combined with other spending measures for transmission to the Senate. Republicans have previously used similar procedural tactics to advance spending packages through the House.
Democrats face difficult choices. If Congress opts for a continuing resolution to fund DHS at current levels, the Trump administration would retain greater discretion over spending priorities. Meanwhile, even if Democrats attempted to eliminate funding for ICE, Trump’s tax cut and border security bill passed last summer already allocates approximately $170 billion for immigration enforcement over the next four years.
The political calculus is further complicated by upcoming elections, as votes to restrict immigration enforcement funding could place vulnerable Democrats in competitive districts at risk of Republican attacks claiming insufficient support for law enforcement.
With the January 30 deadline approaching, lawmakers must navigate these complex issues while maintaining the momentum established by completing half of the required appropriations bills.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
This bipartisan progress on appropriations bills is encouraging for industries like mining and energy that rely on stable government policies and funding. However, the Homeland Security dispute is a potential obstacle that bears watching. Consistent regulation and investment are crucial for these capital-intensive sectors.
Glad to see Congress making progress on federal funding, though the Homeland Security issue could still cause problems. Steady government policies and investment are vital for the mining, energy, and commodities sectors. Hopefully they can resolve the remaining differences without major disruption.
Passing these appropriations bills is a positive step, but the Homeland Security dispute remains a concern. Consistent government funding and policies are critical for capital-intensive industries like mining, which require long-term planning and investment. I’m curious to see how this plays out.
The mining and commodities industries will likely welcome this progress on federal funding bills. Reliable government policies and investment are crucial for their long-term planning and competitiveness. The Homeland Security dispute is a potential wrinkle, though.
Absolutely. Stable and predictable funding, especially for agencies overseeing natural resource development, is essential for the mining and energy sectors. Hopefully the remaining budget negotiations can be resolved without too much disruption.
Funding bills for agencies like Energy and Interior are encouraging for the mining and commodities industries. Reliable federal policy and investment are crucial for long-term planning and competitiveness. I wonder how the Homeland Security dispute will impact the overall budget process.
Glad to see bipartisan progress on federal funding bills. Steady appropriations are key for stability and long-term planning, especially for industries like mining that rely on consistent policy and investment. Curious to see how the Homeland Security dispute gets resolved.
It’s good to see bipartisan cooperation on passing these appropriations bills. Steady government funding is essential for the mining and energy sectors, which require stable policies and regulatory environments to make long-term investments. The Homeland Security issue is a concern, though.
Agreed. Consistent funding and policy certainty are vital for capital-intensive industries like mining and energy. Hopefully the Homeland Security dispute can be resolved without jeopardizing the overall budget process.
This seems like a positive step, though the Homeland Security issue could still cause disruption. Consistent government funding is important for the mining and energy sectors, which benefit from predictable policies and regulations. Hopefully they can iron out the remaining disagreements.