Listen to the article
In a decisive move to counter recent budget cuts, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced plans to restore and increase funding for programs affected by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Speaking at a Center for American Progress forum on Thursday, Schumer addressed concerns about cuts to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and other federal agencies.
“If you look at the budget we’re working on right now, we restore most of the cuts. And even go higher than previous years on many of the programs that DOGE slashed,” Schumer stated, highlighting a significant shift in budget priorities.
While Schumer did not specify which programs would receive increased funding, he emphasized that Democrats have secured bipartisan support for these budgetary adjustments. “We have worked really hard and gotten bipartisan support to increase these amounts and undo a lot of the cuts which are essential,” he added.
The battle over federal spending has intensified since the Trump administration implemented budget reductions through DOGE. Democrats have consistently criticized these cuts as harmful to essential government services, while Republicans frame them as necessary measures to eliminate waste and inefficiency.
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee’s proposal, the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development bill for fiscal year 2026 would see a $5 billion increase over 2025 levels. The final text of this legislation has yet to be released, creating uncertainty around specific funding allocations.
DOGE’s website claims the agency has identified and eliminated $215 billion in wasteful spending since its creation. Republicans succeeded in codifying $115 billion of these reductions through legislation passed last year. However, no additional rescissions packages—special bills that expedite spending cuts at the president’s request—have advanced through Congress since then.
Representative Aaron Bean (R-Fla.), who chairs the House DOGE Caucus, insisted that Republican cost-cutting efforts continue behind the scenes despite the lack of visible progress. “DOGE is still alive,” Bean told Fox News Digital in December. “We’re going to get it rocking. I think that will come down the road.”
Bean attributed the delay in further spending reductions to several pressing issues that have dominated Congress’s attention in recent months. “I think, you know, the shutdown set everybody back a little bit. These credits, with the budget, with everything,” Bean explained, referencing the COVID-era Obamacare tax credits that were central to the 2025 government shutdown.
The conflict over federal spending reflects broader ideological differences between the parties. Republicans maintain that DOGE represents fiscal responsibility and prudent governance, while Democrats argue that many of the targeted programs provide essential services to vulnerable populations.
The debate comes amid growing concerns about the national debt and increasing pressure on lawmakers to balance fiscal responsibility with maintaining critical government functions. Schumer’s proposal to not only restore but exceed previous funding levels represents a significant challenge to the Republican cost-cutting agenda.
As budget negotiations continue, the ultimate fate of these programs remains uncertain. Both parties are likely to use the funding debate as a key talking point in upcoming legislative battles, with Democrats highlighting their commitment to government services and Republicans emphasizing fiscal restraint.
Neither members of the House nor Senate Appropriations committees have publicly responded to Schumer’s recent statements, suggesting that negotiations may still be in flux as lawmakers work to finalize the budget for fiscal year 2026.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
14 Comments
Interesting development on the DOGE funding issue. I’m curious to see how the bipartisan effort to restore cuts plays out during the budget negotiations. This could have implications for key mining and energy programs.
You’re right, the DOGE funding is an important issue that could impact the mining and energy sectors. I’ll be watching closely to see what specific programs get increased support.
While the bipartisan effort to restore DOGE funding is noteworthy, I wonder if it’s enough to truly address the challenges facing the mining and energy sectors. Broader policy shifts may be needed to drive sustainable growth in these industries.
You raise a fair concern. The DOGE funding is a step, but more comprehensive policy reforms may be necessary to support the long-term competitiveness and environmental sustainability of mining and energy.
As an investor in mining and energy stocks, I’m hopeful that the DOGE funding restoration will benefit those sectors. But I’ll reserve judgment until I see the specifics of where the money is allocated.
Agreed, the allocation of funds will be critical. Investors will be looking closely at how this plays out and what the implications are for the industries we follow.
I’m skeptical about the bipartisan support claims. Given the partisan divides, I wonder how much compromise will really be involved in restoring DOGE funding. Transparency around the process will be important.
That’s a fair concern. The details of the bipartisan negotiations and final budget will reveal how much true compromise was reached. Oversight and public input will be crucial.
The DOGE funding issue is an interesting one, but I’m more concerned about the broader economic and policy trends that could impact mining and energy. Things like inflation, supply chain challenges, and climate regulations deserve close attention as well.
That’s a good point. The DOGE funding is just one piece of the puzzle. The macroeconomic and regulatory environment will have a bigger influence on the long-term outlook for these industries.
The proposed DOGE funding increases could be good news for miners and energy companies, if the money goes to the right places. I hope they target investments that drive innovation and sustainability in these industries.
Agreed, the funding allocations will be crucial. Supporting R&D, modernization, and clean energy initiatives in mining and energy could yield long-term benefits.
While I appreciate the bipartisan approach, I have some concerns about the broader impacts of restoring DOGE funding. We need to ensure a balanced budget that supports critical infrastructure without adding to the deficit.
That’s a fair point. The budget negotiations will require careful consideration of fiscal responsibility alongside program needs. It will be interesting to see how they strike that balance.