Listen to the article
Republican Congressman Addresses Transgender Lawmaker as “Gentleman” on House Floor
Republican Representative Andrew Clyde of Georgia sparked controversy on Tuesday when he referred to Democratic Representative Sarah McBride of Delaware as “the gentleman from Delaware, Representative McBride” during House proceedings. McBride, who made history last year as the first openly transgender member of Congress, identifies as a woman.
Following the incident, Clyde took to social media platform X to defend his remarks, writing, “The People’s House recognizes basic biology.” The comment was accompanied by video footage of the exchange on the House floor.
This incident marks the latest chapter in an ongoing culture war over gender identity playing out in the halls of Congress. It follows a similar episode last year when Republican Representative Mary Miller of Illinois also addressed McBride as “the gentleman from Delaware, Mr. McBride” during floor proceedings.
Several House Republicans quickly voiced support for Clyde’s actions. Rep. Miller expressed her approval, writing on X: “Tim ‘Sarah’ McBride is a man. Appreciate @Rep_Clyde for acknowledging this basic biological truth on the House floor.” Miller was referring to McBride’s birth name.
Arizona Representative Andy Biggs also backed Clyde’s stance, stating on social media: “A biological man can never be a woman, no matter how much makeup he puts on. My friend @Rep_Clyde stands for truth.” South Carolina Representative Sheri Biggs added simply, “Truth Matters,” in her own social media post supporting the incident.
McBride’s office has not yet responded to requests for comment on the situation.
The exchange highlights the deepening partisan divide over transgender rights and recognition in official government settings. Since taking office, McBride has faced ongoing challenges from some Republican colleagues who refuse to acknowledge her gender identity.
Political analysts note that such incidents have become more common as transgender rights increasingly become a wedge issue in American politics. The National Center for Transgender Equality has documented a sharp rise in anti-transgender legislation at both state and federal levels in recent years.
Congressional rules regarding forms of address are generally guided by tradition and courtesy, with members typically being addressed by their preferred titles. However, some Republican lawmakers have argued that biological sex should determine how members are addressed, regardless of gender identity.
The incident also reflects broader national debates about transgender recognition in public spaces, schools, and government institutions. Over 25 states have passed legislation restricting various aspects of transgender rights in recent years, from sports participation to healthcare access.
McBride, 34, came to national prominence as a transgender rights activist before entering politics. Prior to her election to Congress, she served in the Delaware state legislature, where she was the first openly transgender state senator in U.S. history.
As the first openly transgender member of Congress, McBride’s presence has highlighted both progress and ongoing resistance to LGBTQ+ representation in American politics. The continuing disputes over how she is addressed by colleagues underscores that her historic election remains a flashpoint in America’s evolving cultural landscape.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


12 Comments
As a neutral observer, I think it’s crucial for elected officials to maintain professional conduct and treat all their colleagues with dignity, even when they disagree on sensitive social issues.
Resorting to disrespectful language and rhetoric seems counterproductive and unlikely to advance constructive discourse on this complex topic.
This seems like another flashpoint in the ongoing political debate around gender identity. While I may have personal views on the topic, I try to approach these issues as objectively as possible and focus on the facts at hand.
It’s important to have respectful, nuanced discussions on complex social and political topics like this.
Regardless of one’s personal views, addressing an elected official in a disrespectful manner on the House floor seems unproductive. Maintaining civility and decorum in government proceedings is crucial.
I hope both sides can find ways to engage on this issue in a more constructive manner going forward.
This incident highlights the ongoing tensions around gender identity in US politics. While I may not agree with all perspectives, I believe focusing on facts and respecting individual identities is important.
Hopefully this situation can be resolved through open and respectful dialogue between all parties involved.
While I understand the strong feelings and differing views on gender identity, I believe our elected representatives should set a positive example by engaging on these issues thoughtfully and civilly.
Ultimately, I hope this situation can lead to greater mutual understanding, even if full agreement remains elusive.
This is a sensitive and contentious topic, but I think it’s important for our political leaders to approach it with nuance, empathy and a commitment to respectful dialogue, even when they disagree.
Resorting to disrespectful language or grandstanding is unlikely to lead to productive solutions on complex social issues like this.