Listen to the article
Senator Tuberville’s Eligibility for Alabama Governor Challenged Over Residency
A Republican challenger has formally contested U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville’s eligibility to run for governor of Alabama, claiming the former football coach fails to meet the state’s seven-year residency requirement.
Ken McFeeters, who is also seeking the Republican nomination for governor, filed the challenge Tuesday with the Alabama Republican Party. McFeeters alleges Tuberville primarily lives in a multimillion-dollar beach home in Florida rather than the modest Auburn, Alabama, residence he claims as his official domicile.
“It’s belittling to the average person in Alabama for him to think we believe that he’s being sincere when he says he lives at his son’s $300,000 house when he’s got a $6 million beach house,” McFeeters said in a phone interview. “Where would you live?”
Property records reveal a stark contrast between Tuberville’s two homes. The Auburn property, initially purchased by Tuberville’s wife and son in 2017, has an appraised value of $291,780 and carries a homestead exemption. By comparison, his Walton County, Florida, beach home is valued at approximately $5.5 million. Both properties were recently placed in a revocable trust with Tuberville’s wife serving as trustee.
In his letter to party officials, McFeeters argued that Tuberville’s Auburn address appears to be “an address of convenience rather than a true domicile.” He further pointed to Tuberville’s travel records showing frequent trips to Florida’s Panhandle as evidence supporting his contention.
The Alabama Constitution requires gubernatorial candidates to have been “resident citizens of this state at least seven years next before the date of their election,” though the precise interpretation of this language remains somewhat ambiguous.
Tuberville’s campaign dismissed the challenge as a “ridiculous PR stunt from a desperate candidate.” Campaign spokeswoman Mallory Jaspers defended the senator’s credentials, stating, “Senator Tuberville has proudly represented Alabama in the United States Senate for the past six years. This made-up narrative didn’t work when he was running for Senate in 2019, and it certainly isn’t going to work now.” She maintained that the Auburn home remains Tuberville’s primary residence.
This isn’t the first time Tuberville’s residency has come under scrutiny. During his 2020 Senate campaign, opponents labeled him a “Florida man” and “tourist in Alabama,” though Senate candidacy has less stringent residency requirements than gubernatorial races.
Tuberville’s ties to Alabama include his tenure as head football coach at Auburn University from 1999 to 2008. After leaving Auburn, he coached at Texas Tech and the University of Cincinnati before joining ESPN as a commentator. In a 2017 promotional video for the sports network, Tuberville discussed moving to Florida after retiring from coaching.
Voting records show Tuberville cast a ballot in Florida in 2018 before registering to vote in Alabama on March 28, 2019—approximately two weeks before announcing his Senate candidacy.
When asked about the residency requirement earlier this month, Tuberville expressed confidence in his eligibility. “We checked it out. I wouldn’t be doing this if I thought it was a problem,” he told The Associated Press.
The Alabama Republican Party’s 21-member steering committee will now evaluate the challenge. According to party spokeswoman Jeannie Burniston, the committee will determine whether sufficient evidence exists to warrant a formal hearing where both sides can present their cases.
Susan Pace Hamill, a professor at the University of Alabama School of Law, noted the constitutional language regarding residency is vague and potentially open to interpretation. However, she suggested Alabama’s cultural context supports a consecutive seven-year requirement.
“Alabama’s culture is suspicious of outsiders and historically most of Alabama’s governors were born and raised in the state, often having been descended from generations of Alabamians,” Hamill explained.
The residency dispute adds another layer of complexity to Alabama’s upcoming gubernatorial race, highlighting the tension between traditional state politics and candidates with complex residential histories.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


14 Comments
It’s concerning if an elected official is found to be misleading the public about their primary residence. Voters need to have confidence that their representatives are genuinely connected to the communities they serve.
Interesting development in the Alabama governor’s race. Residency requirements are an important safeguard, so it’s good to see this issue being raised and examined.
Exactly. Elected officials should be held accountable to live up to the standards and expectations set for their positions.
The residency challenge raises valid questions that warrant further investigation. Voters deserve to have confidence that their representatives are genuinely connected to and serving the communities they claim to represent.
This residency challenge raises some interesting questions about Senator Tuberville’s primary place of residence. It will be important to see how this issue is resolved in the lead-up to the gubernatorial election.
Absolutely, the residency requirements for elected officials should be taken seriously. Voters deserve transparency around where their representatives truly live and work.
It’s concerning if an elected official appears to be misleading the public about their primary residence. Voters should be able to trust that their representatives are living in and serving the communities they claim to represent.
I agree. Residency rules exist for good reason, and any potential violations need to be thoroughly investigated to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.
This is a complex issue that deserves careful consideration. Residency rules can be nuanced, so I hope the relevant authorities thoroughly investigate the facts before reaching any conclusions.
Well said. These types of challenges should be handled objectively and in accordance with the law, without undue political influence.
This seems like a legitimate challenge that warrants further scrutiny. The stark contrast between Tuberville’s two properties raises reasonable doubts about his claimed residency.
This is an important issue that highlights the need for transparency and accountability in our political system. Residency requirements are in place for good reason, and any potential violations should be taken seriously.
I agree completely. Upholding the integrity of our elections and ensuring that candidates meet the necessary criteria is crucial for a functioning democracy.
I’m curious to see how this residency challenge plays out. It’s important that candidates meet the legal requirements to run for office, regardless of their political affiliation.