Listen to the article
Omar Defends Support for Pandemic Food Program Despite Link to Major Fraud Case
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) defended her backing of the 2020 MEALS Act this week, expressing no regrets about supporting the pandemic-era legislation despite its connection to Minnesota’s alleged $250 million “Feeding Our Future” fraud scheme.
“Absolutely not, it did help feed kids,” Omar told Fox News Digital when asked if she regretted pushing for the bill.
Omar introduced the MEALS Act in March 2020 to modify Department of Agriculture food and nutrition programs, allowing waivers on requirements for school meal programs during pandemic-related school closures. The legislation relaxed many standard requirements, including those related to federal costs.
These waivers have since become the center of intense scrutiny after Minnesota’s “Feeding Our Future” program became the target of what federal authorities describe as the largest pandemic fraud scheme in the state’s history. The scheme exploited the loosened regulations, particularly the USDA’s decision to relax requirements for non-school-based distributors to participate in federal food programs.
According to FBI Director Kash Patel, the fraud ranks as “one of the worst” in Minnesota history. More than 75 individuals have been charged in connection with the scheme as of November 2025, federal prosecutors said.
The scale of the operation was massive—conspirators allegedly claimed to have served millions of meals during the pandemic while actually using the funds for personal gain. Authorities uncovered fabricated invoices, fake attendance records, and fraudulent distribution claims from hundreds of so-called food sites across Minnesota. Charging documents reveal that approximately 300 “food sites” served little or no food, with organizations created specifically to launder money intended for feeding children.
“Stealing from the federal government equates to stealing from the American people—there is no simpler truth,” FBI Special Agent in Charge Alvin Winston said in a statement to Fox News Digital.
The investigation has already prompted legislative reform in Minnesota, with officials indicating that additional charges are expected as the probe continues.
“The egregious fraud unveiled in the Feeding our Future case epitomizes a profound betrayal of public trust,” Patel said earlier this year. “These individuals misappropriated hundreds of millions in federal funds intended to nourish vulnerable children during a time of crisis, redirecting those resources into luxury homes, high-end vehicles and extravagant lifestyles while families faced hardship.”
The fraud has become a political lightning rod in recent weeks. President Donald Trump has announced new actions to crack down on fraud schemes in Minnesota, which he has characterized as a “hub of money laundering activity.” The Trump administration has also initiated a Treasury Department investigation into claims that taxpayer dollars were allegedly diverted to the terrorist organization al-Shabaab.
Trump and his officials have criticized Minnesota Governor Tim Walz’s administration, claiming the criminal activity stems from “incompetence” and mismanagement by the Democratic governor and former vice presidential candidate.
“It’s not surprising that the president has chosen to broadly target an entire community,” Walz responded, adding, “This is what he does to change the subject.”
The controversy has taken on additional dimensions with Trump suggesting earlier this month that Omar, who fled Somalia as a child, “shouldn’t be allowed to be a congresswoman,” prompting fierce backlash from Democrats and members of Minnesota’s congressional delegation.
Omar called Trump’s remarks “vile” and said on social media, “His obsession with me is creepy. I hope he gets the help he desperately needs.”
The fraud investigation continues to impact Minnesota politically and economically, with FBI officials confirming that the investigation remains active and suggesting more developments are forthcoming.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
Pandemic relief efforts like the MEALS Act were critical, but the alleged fraud in Minnesota is troubling. Policymakers must strike a balance between rapid assistance and robust safeguards to protect taxpayer funds.
The alleged $250 million fraud scheme in Minnesota highlights the risks of hastily implemented pandemic programs. Careful monitoring and auditing are needed to prevent abuse, while still providing vital aid to those in need.
It’s concerning to see the MEALS Act linked to this major fraud case. Oversight and transparency are crucial to ensure these types of programs are helping the intended recipients, not being exploited.
This is a concerning case of alleged fraud related to pandemic relief efforts. While the MEALS Act aimed to help feed kids during school closures, it seems the loosened regulations were exploited. Oversight and accountability are crucial when implementing emergency programs.
It’s good that Rep. Omar is defending the original intent of the MEALS Act, even if the program was misused. Balancing emergency assistance with proper safeguards is challenging but important.
The alleged fraud in Minnesota is deeply concerning and raises important questions about the implementation of pandemic relief programs like the MEALS Act. Ensuring proper controls and monitoring is crucial to prevent abuse while still providing vital assistance.
I agree that the original intent of the MEALS Act was to help feed kids during school closures. However, the alleged fraud case shows the need for stronger safeguards to protect against misuse of taxpayer funds, even in emergency situations.
The alleged fraud in Minnesota is very concerning and raises important questions about the implementation of the MEALS Act. Providing rapid assistance is critical, but safeguarding taxpayer funds from abuse should also be a top priority for policymakers.
I agree that Rep. Omar’s defense of the MEALS Act’s original intent is understandable, even if the program was exploited. Striking the right balance between emergency aid and robust controls is an ongoing challenge for government programs.
This is a troubling case that underscores the importance of robust oversight and accountability when implementing large-scale emergency programs. While the MEALS Act aimed to assist families, the alleged fraud highlights the risks of hastily rolled out initiatives.
This is a complex issue without easy answers. While the MEALS Act aimed to help feed kids, the alleged fraud highlights the challenges of implementing large-scale emergency programs quickly. Careful oversight and accountability should be priorities going forward.