Listen to the article
Prominent Catholic Bishop Condemns Church Disruption Amid Growing Anti-ICE Tensions in Minnesota
Catholic Bishop Robert Barron has publicly denounced the actions of protesters who stormed a church service in St. Paul, Minnesota, last Sunday during an anti-ICE demonstration. Barron, who leads the Diocese of Winona-Rochester in southeastern Minnesota and founded “Word on Fire” Ministries, called the disruption “unacceptable” and “a violation of religious liberty.”
“I don’t care what is animating or annoying you, I don’t care what your political persuasion might be, invading a church is unacceptable,” Barron wrote in a social media post on Monday, responding to the incident at Cities Church, a Baptist congregation.
During the service, dozens of protesters entered the church, chanting “Justice for Renee Good” and “Who needs justice, we need justice.” The demonstration is part of ongoing protests that have intensified across Minnesota following the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Minneapolis in January.
In a separate statement on Sunday, Barron addressed the broader unrest sweeping across the state. “As a resident of Minnesota and as bishop of the Diocese of Winona-Rochester, my heart is breaking over the situation in my home state,” he wrote, describing a climate of “violence, retribution, threats, protests, deep suspicion of one another, political unrest, fear.”
The bishop offered what he termed a “modest proposal” for resolving the tensions, suggesting that “the Trump Administration and ICE should limit themselves, at least for the time being, to rounding up undocumented people who have committed serious crimes.” He also called for political leaders to “stop stirring up resentment against officers” and for protesters to “cease interfering with the work of ICE.”
The church disruption has drawn swift condemnation from federal officials. The Department of Justice announced plans to investigate potential federal civil rights violations “by these people desecrating a house of worship and interfering with Christian worshipers,” according to Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon.
Attorney General Pam Bondi reinforced this position, stating that “attacks against law enforcement and the intimidation of Christians are being met with the full force of federal law.” White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson criticized the protesters as “radical leftists” and accused Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey of having “whipped these rioters into a frenzy.”
The church disruption occurs amid a highly charged atmosphere in Minnesota. A federal judge recently imposed restrictions on ICE agents following protests over Good’s shooting. The incident has become a flashpoint in the ongoing national debate over immigration enforcement policies.
Governor Walz has been visible during the unrest, attending a vigil for Renee Good at the state capitol building in St. Paul. Critics, including former President Trump, have accused Walz and Representative Ilhan Omar of using the ICE protests to distract from other issues in the state.
The tensions in Minnesota reflect the deeply polarized national discourse around immigration enforcement, religious freedom, and protest rights. Bishop Barron’s concluding appeal for dialogue underscores the challenges facing communities caught in these intersecting conflicts: “Everyone on all sides must stop shouting at one another and demonizing their opponents. Where we are now is untenable. There is a way out.”
As federal investigations begin and tensions remain high, Minnesota’s religious and civic leaders face the difficult task of addressing legitimate grievances while maintaining public order and protecting constitutional rights to both free expression and religious practice.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
20 Comments
Bishop Barron’s condemnation of the church disruption is well-justified. Peaceful protest is a fundamental right, but it should not come at the expense of violating the religious freedom of others. The church should remain a sacred space where people can worship without interference, regardless of one’s political views.
I agree. The Bishop’s stance highlights the need to balance the right to protest with the equally important right to freedom of religion.
I agree with Bishop Barron’s position on this issue. While the protesters may have valid concerns, disrupting a church service is unacceptable and a violation of religious liberty. Peaceful protest is essential, but it must be channeled in ways that respect the rights of others.
Absolutely. The Bishop’s statement rightly emphasizes the importance of maintaining the sanctity of places of worship, even in the face of political disagreements.
While the protesters may have been motivated by a desire for justice, disrupting a church service is not the right approach. Bishop Barron’s statement rightly emphasizes the importance of respecting religious liberty, which is a fundamental human right.
Exactly. Peaceful protest is crucial, but it must be balanced against the need to preserve the sanctity of places of worship.
I appreciate Bishop Barron’s firm stance on this issue. Regardless of one’s political views, the church should remain a sanctuary where people can practice their faith without interference. Disrupting a service is a clear violation of religious freedom.
Well said. Protest is important, but it must be channeled in ways that do not undermine the fundamental rights of others.
This is a sensitive and complex situation, but I believe the Bishop is correct in his assessment. While the protesters may have legitimate concerns, disrupting a church service is an unacceptable violation of religious liberty. There are more constructive ways to voice dissent.
Agreed. Peaceful protest is vital, but it must be balanced against the need to respect the sanctity of places of worship.
This is a complex issue, but I believe the Bishop is correct in condemning the disruption of the church service. Peaceful protest is important, but it must be balanced against the right to freedom of religion. Invading a place of worship crosses an ethical line.
Agreed. The protesters may have valid grievances, but there are more appropriate ways to voice them that don’t infringe on the rights of others.
Disrupting a church service, regardless of the cause, is clearly unacceptable. Bishop Barron is right to condemn this violation of religious liberty. Peaceful protest is one thing, but interfering with a worship service crosses an important line.
I agree. Even if one has strong political views, the church should remain a sanctuary where people can worship without disturbance.
This is a concerning situation. While the protesters may have valid grievances, disrupting a church service is not an appropriate way to voice them. Bishop Barron’s statement emphasizes the importance of respecting religious freedom, which is a fundamental right.
Absolutely. There are constructive ways to bring about change without infringing on others’ ability to practice their faith in peace.
The Bishop makes a fair point. Protest is a legitimate form of expression, but it should not come at the expense of violating religious freedom. Disrupting a church service sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the values of a free and tolerant society.
I agree. While the protesters may have sincere concerns, the church should remain a sacred space where people can worship without interference.
Bishop Barron’s statement is a strong and principled defense of religious freedom. Regardless of the protesters’ motivations, invading a church service is a clear transgression that should be condemned. Peaceful protest is important, but it cannot come at the expense of violating fundamental human rights.
Well said. The Bishop’s words highlight the need to uphold the values of a free and tolerant society, even in the face of political tensions.