Listen to the article
Taxpayers Face Growing Infrastructure Bill for Obama Presidential Center
Former President Barack Obama once described his presidential center as a “gift” to Chicago, but a recent investigation reveals taxpayers are shouldering hundreds of millions of dollars in infrastructure costs necessary for the project’s viability.
Despite the Obama Foundation’s commitment to privately fund the construction of the 19.3-acre campus in Chicago’s historic Jackson Park, the extensive public infrastructure required to support the facility—including redesigned roads, stormwater systems, and relocated utilities—is being financed by taxpayers at both the state and city levels.
The Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) now reports approximately $229 million in state-managed infrastructure spending related to the project, up significantly from earlier estimates of $174 million. Meanwhile, Chicago officials have failed to provide a clear accounting of the city’s financial commitment, which was initially projected at around $175 million when the project was approved in 2018.
“Illinois Republicans saw this coming a mile away,” said Illinois GOP Chair Kathy Salvi. “Now Illinois Democrats are leaving taxpayers high and dry and putting them on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars to support the ugliest building in Chicago.”
A months-long investigation involving multiple Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to various agencies revealed a troubling lack of transparency. No single government entity appears to oversee the full scope of infrastructure work, making it impossible to determine the overall public cost.
The Illinois Attorney General’s Public Access Counselor is now reviewing whether multiple agencies complied with state transparency laws following these FOIA requests.
The scale of taxpayer-funded work far exceeds typical infrastructure improvements associated with presidential libraries. A major portion involved permanently removing Cornell Drive—a four-lane roadway that bordered the center’s east side—and rerouting traffic farther west. This change reduced the number of public roads adjacent to the complex and created a more unified campus footprint.
Workers also removed trees, relocated water mains, sewer lines, and electrical infrastructure, and installed new drainage systems as part of the public infrastructure project. Without these extensive modifications, the center could not function as designed.
The project has been controversial from the start. The center sits on parkland transferred under a 99-year agreement for just $10, prompting legal challenges that were ultimately dismissed. Critics argue the roadway redesign altered long-standing park infrastructure primarily to accommodate the foundation’s preferred layout.
Unlike traditional presidential libraries operated by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the Obama Presidential Center will not house the former president’s official records, which will remain at a federal site in Maryland. Instead, the Chicago complex will be operated privately by the Obama Foundation, which oversees leadership programs and civic initiatives aligned with Obama’s priorities.
While the foundation is covering the center’s construction costs—which have ballooned from initial estimates of $330 million to at least $850 million—concerns have emerged about financial protections for taxpayers. A $470 million reserve fund that the foundation promised to establish to protect taxpayers has received only $1 million in deposits so far.
Chicago’s 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Plan lists more than $206 million allocated to roadway and utility work surrounding the project. However, much of that funding is labeled as coming from state sources, and neither state nor city officials have clarified how these allocations overlap with IDOT’s reported total.
The Obama Foundation defends the project as a catalyst for investment in an underserved area. “The Obama Foundation is investing $850 million in private funding to build the Obama Presidential Center and give back to the community that made the Obamas’ story possible,” said foundation spokesperson Emily Bittner. “After decades of underinvestment on the South Side of Chicago, the OPC is catalyzing investment, from both public and private sources.”
As construction continues, the full extent of taxpayer obligations remains unclear. What is certain is that Obama’s “gift” to Chicago comes with a substantial public price tag that continues to grow, with no comprehensive accounting available to citizens footing the bill.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
The article raises some valid concerns about the financial burden being placed on taxpayers for this project. I hope there is thorough oversight and accounting to ensure the costs are reasonable and justified.
Agreed. Taxpayer-funded infrastructure projects should have robust public scrutiny to ensure responsible use of resources.
Interesting to see the costs for the Obama Presidential Center infrastructure continue to rise. I wonder if the local community will feel the impact of these public funds being diverted to this project.
That’s a good point. Transparency around infrastructure spending is important, especially for a project like this that will impact the local area.
It’s concerning to see the infrastructure costs for the Obama Center escalating. I hope there is a transparent process to evaluate these expenditures and ensure they are necessary and well-managed.
Yes, transparency is key. Taxpayers deserve to know how their money is being allocated for this high-profile project.
The rising infrastructure costs for the Obama Center raise questions about the project’s overall financial planning and management. Responsible governance requires clear accounting of public funds.
This article highlights the importance of carefully scrutinizing infrastructure projects that rely on public funding. Taxpayers should have confidence that their money is being spent wisely.
Absolutely. Oversight and transparency are critical to ensuring responsible use of public resources for initiatives like the Obama Center.
This article raises important questions about the financial planning and transparency around the Obama Center infrastructure costs. Taxpayers deserve a clear accounting of how their money is being used.
Well said. Responsible governance requires diligent oversight of public infrastructure projects to maintain public trust.
The growing infrastructure costs for the Obama Presidential Center are concerning. I hope there is rigorous analysis to ensure these expenditures are justified and beneficial for the community.