Listen to the article
The Nobel Foundation issued a statement Sunday clarifying that Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado cannot legitimately transfer her Nobel Peace Prize to former President Donald Trump, following her gesture during a White House meeting last week.
“One of the core missions of the Nobel Foundation is to safeguard the dignity of the Nobel Prizes and their administration,” the foundation stated. “The Foundation upholds Alfred Nobel’s will and its stipulations. It states that the prizes shall be awarded to those who ‘have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind,’ and it specifies who has the right to award each respective prize.”
The statement emphasized: “A prize can therefore not, even symbolically, be passed on or further distributed.”
This clarification came after Machado presented her Peace Prize to Trump in what she described as “a very emotional moment.” In an interview with “FOX & Friends Weekend,” Machado explained her rationale, saying, “He deserves it,” and that she was acting on behalf of the Venezuelan people.
Machado specifically credited Trump for what she characterized as his historic role in liberating Venezuela from President Nicolás Maduro’s regime. “Venezuelans appreciate so much what he has done for, not only the freedom of the Venezuelan people, but I would say the whole hemisphere,” she told the network.
The unusual gesture appears linked to Trump’s unprecedented actions regarding Venezuela. As a longtime critic of the Maduro government, Machado has vocally supported Trump’s involvement in Venezuelan affairs, including what she referred to as the “historic capture” of the Venezuelan leader.
Trump appeared appreciative of the gesture, writing on his Truth Social platform: “It was my Great Honor to meet María Corina Machado, of Venezuela, today. María presented me with her Nobel Peace Prize for the work I have done. Such a wonderful gesture of mutual respect.”
The Norwegian Nobel Institute had previously attempted to prevent the symbolic transfer before Machado’s White House meeting. “Once a Nobel Prize is announced, it cannot be revoked, shared, or transferred to others,” the institute stated. “The decision is final and stands for all time.”
The incident highlights the complex political dynamics surrounding Venezuela’s ongoing crisis. Machado has emerged as a prominent opposition figure against Maduro’s government, which has faced international criticism for alleged human rights abuses and undemocratic practices.
This symbolic prize transfer also underscores the polarized perspectives on U.S. involvement in Venezuelan affairs. While Machado and her supporters view Trump’s actions as liberating, critics have questioned the effectiveness and legality of aggressive U.S. policies toward Venezuela.
The Nobel Peace Prize, established by Alfred Nobel’s will in 1895, is one of the world’s most prestigious awards, recognizing individuals and organizations who have contributed to peace efforts globally. The Norwegian Nobel Committee, appointed by Norway’s parliament, selects the Peace Prize laureates, while the Nobel Foundation administers the prizes and safeguards their integrity.
This unusual diplomatic incident reflects broader tensions in U.S.-Latin American relations and the continuing struggle for democracy in Venezuela, where political and humanitarian crises have displaced millions of citizens and created regional instability.
Neither Trump’s team nor Machado has issued additional comments following the Nobel Foundation’s clarification about the non-transferable nature of the prize.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
Interesting response from the Nobel Foundation. They seem intent on maintaining the integrity and legitimacy of the Peace Prize process. Transferring a prize, even symbolically, does seem to go against the intent and spirit of the award.
The Foundation’s response highlights the need to follow the established criteria and processes for the Nobel Prizes. Allowing symbolic transfers could set a problematic precedent and diminish the significance of these awards.
The Foundation’s statement underscores the importance of following the proper procedures and criteria for the Nobel Prizes. This helps preserve the prestige and meaning of these prestigious awards.
This is an interesting development, but the Foundation’s stance makes sense. The Nobel Prizes are meant to recognize specific individuals for their contributions, not be passed around symbolically. It will be worth following how this situation unfolds.
I’m curious to hear more about Machado’s rationale for presenting the Peace Prize to Trump. While he may have taken actions related to Venezuela, the Foundation seems clear that prizes cannot be passed on or distributed in this manner.
The Nobel Foundation’s position appears reasonable – the prizes should be awarded according to the established process and criteria, not transferred or symbolically given to others. Maintaining the integrity of these honors is crucial.
While Machado may have had good intentions, the Foundation is right to uphold the proper procedures for awarding the Nobel Prizes. Maintaining the integrity of these honors is important, even in politically-charged situations.
The Foundation’s statement is a firm defense of the Nobel Prize process and its core purpose. Allowing prizes to be transferred, even symbolically, could undermine the meaning and value of these prestigious awards.