Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Nebraska’s Immigration Detention Facility Opens, Sparks Controversy

A minimum-security state prison in Nebraska’s remote southwest region has begun operations as a federal immigration detention center, Governor Jim Pillen announced Thursday. The facility in McCook is already housing between 50 and 60 immigrant detainees and is expected to reach its current 200-person capacity by Thanksgiving.

The Republican governor also revealed plans are underway for a second phase of conversion that would add another 100 beds, bringing the total capacity to 300. “I would expect that the second phase will be ready in the first part of the new year,” Pillen said.

Located in McCook, a small city of approximately 7,000 residents situated in the open prairies between Denver and Omaha, the facility previously functioned as the McCook Work Ethic Camp. The camp had housed around 180 low-level offenders participating in education, treatment, and work programs designed to ease their transition back into society.

The work camp had been considered a success story in Nebraska’s corrections system. Prisoners regularly contributed to the community by working on roads, in parks, county and city offices, and even local schools. State officials had frequently praised the program for its effectiveness in reducing recidivism rates.

With the facility’s conversion, these low-level offenders have been dispersed throughout Nebraska’s prison system. Several were paroled, placed on probation, or released, but the majority were transferred to other facilities. More than 100 were sent to community corrections centers in Omaha and Lincoln, while dozens of others were relocated to various state prisons.

The decision to repurpose the facility came as a surprise to McCook officials and residents when Governor Pillen announced in August that he was transitioning the prison for federal use as part of former President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement initiatives. The detention center has been dubbed the “Cornhusker Clink,” following similar naming patterns for other recently announced detention centers like Florida’s “Alligator Alcatraz” and “Deportation Depot,” and Indiana’s “Speedway Slammer.”

The abrupt conversion has drawn criticism from several Nebraska lawmakers who argue that Pillen acted hastily, particularly given that the state’s prison system already ranks among the nation’s most overcrowded and consistently understaffed.

In response to the governor’s decision, former state Senator DiAnna Schimek and thirteen other McCook residents filed a lawsuit against Pillen and the director of the state prison system. The lawsuit, backed by the nonprofit legal advocacy group Nebraska Appleseed, contends that only the Legislature possesses the constitutional authority to control state prisons or repurpose public buildings.

While the plaintiffs sought a temporary injunction to halt the prison’s conversion during legal proceedings, a judge rejected their motion last month. The judge also denied Pillen’s motion to dismiss the case entirely, allowing the legal challenge to continue.

The opening of this detention facility reflects a broader trend in immigration enforcement. By mid-September, nearly 60,000 people were being held in immigration detention across the country—representing a 51% increase since January, according to data from the nonprofit Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC).

TRAC’s analysis indicates that approximately 70% of those detained have no criminal record. Among those with convictions, many have been detained for minor offenses, some as minimal as traffic violations.

The McCook facility, situated about 210 miles west of Nebraska’s capital Lincoln, represents the ongoing tension between federal immigration policies and local community interests, as well as questions about the appropriate use of state correctional resources during a time of prison overcrowding.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

19 Comments

  1. William I. Thompson on

    The rapid expansion of immigration detention capacity in this rural area is concerning and warrants close monitoring to ensure humane conditions and appropriate community engagement. I hope the government is responsive to stakeholder feedback as this facility ramps up operations.

    • Agreed, the pace of this transition is worrying and will require vigilant oversight to address potential issues that may arise.

  2. While addressing immigration detention needs is important, the rapid conversion of this facility raises questions about the long-term sustainability and impact on the local area. I hope the government closely monitors the situation and is responsive to community concerns.

    • Agreed, the speed of this transition is concerning and warrants close scrutiny to ensure it is done in a responsible and thoughtful manner.

  3. The move to convert this state prison into a federal immigration detention center is a significant change that will impact both the inmates and the local community. I hope the government prioritizes transparency, engagement, and humane treatment as this transition unfolds.

  4. Jennifer D. Davis on

    This is a controversial move to convert a state prison into a federal immigration detention center. While it may help address immigration detention needs, the loss of the community-focused work program raises concerns about the impact on inmates and the local economy.

    • Elizabeth Lopez on

      Definitely a complex issue that will require careful oversight to ensure humane treatment and consideration of the community’s needs.

  5. This conversion of a state prison into a federal immigration detention center is a significant shift that raises valid concerns about the loss of the successful work program and the potential impact on the local community. I hope the government carefully considers all implications as this transition moves forward.

  6. Patricia U. Smith on

    It’s encouraging to see the facility aiming to reach full capacity by Thanksgiving, but the rapid expansion raises questions about whether proper planning and preparation has been done to ensure a safe and humane environment for detainees.

    • Agreed, the timeline seems quite aggressive. Careful monitoring of conditions and services will be critical as this facility ramps up.

  7. Transitioning this facility from a work program prison to an immigration detention center is a complex decision with many competing interests at play. I hope the government is able to balance the needs of detainees, the local community, and broader immigration policy objectives.

  8. Patricia Thomas on

    While addressing immigration detention needs is important, converting a successful work program prison into a detention center seems like a missed opportunity to continue rehabilitation efforts. I hope the facility can find ways to balance security and humane treatment.

    • That’s a good point. The loss of the work program is a significant change that may have broader societal impacts beyond just immigration detention.

  9. While addressing immigration detention needs is important, the conversion of this successful work program prison raises valid concerns about the impact on inmates and the local community. I hope the government prioritizes transparency, community engagement, and humane treatment as this transition unfolds.

  10. The conversion of this state prison raises valid concerns about the loss of the successful work program and the potential impact on the local community. I hope the federal government engages closely with stakeholders to address these issues.

    • Absolutely, maintaining open communication and incorporating community feedback will be crucial for the success of this transition.

  11. The rapid expansion of immigration detention capacity in this rural area is concerning. I hope the facility is able to provide quality services and support for detainees, while also maintaining transparency and community engagement.

    • William Taylor on

      Agreed, the local impact on the community will be an important factor to monitor as this transition progresses.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.