Listen to the article
NATO Chief Warns Europe: “Keep Dreaming” About Defense Without US Amid Greenland Tensions
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte issued a stark warning to European leaders Monday, emphasizing their critical dependence on the United States for defense capabilities amid growing tensions over President Donald Trump’s continued interest in acquiring Greenland.
“If anyone thinks here again that the European Union, or Europe as a whole, can defend itself without the U.S., keep on dreaming. You can’t. We can’t. We need each other,” Rutte declared during an address to the European Parliament in Brussels.
The NATO chief painted a sobering picture of what European defense would require without American support. He explained that European nations would need to dramatically increase defense spending to approximately 10% of GDP—double the current NATO alliance pledge of 5% by 2035—and develop their own nuclear capabilities.
“In that scenario, you will lose the ultimate guarantor of our freedom, which is the U.S. nuclear umbrella. So hey, good luck,” Rutte stated bluntly.
His comments come at a sensitive moment in transatlantic relations, as President Trump has renewed efforts to acquire Greenland—a move that has created friction with both Denmark and Greenland itself. Trump initially threatened to impose escalating tariffs on NATO countries, starting at 10% and potentially rising to 25%, until a deal for Greenland could be reached.
The strategic importance of Greenland has increased significantly in recent years as climate change opens new Arctic shipping lanes and reveals valuable natural resources. Both Russia and China have expanded their presence in the region, a development that concerns Western security experts.
Despite the tensions, Trump appeared to soften his stance following discussions at the World Economic Forum in Davos, announcing on social media that the U.S. and NATO had established a “framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region.” He also pledged not to use military force to acquire the island. However, details of this framework remain unclear, with Trump telling reporters Thursday that negotiations were ongoing.
Greenland, while seeking greater autonomy, has explicitly rejected American overtures. “If we have to choose between the USA and Denmark here and now, we choose Denmark,” Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen told reporters in January. “We choose NATO, the Kingdom of Denmark and the EU.”
The island’s relationship with Denmark is complex, marked by a complicated history regarding the treatment of indigenous populations. Nevertheless, Greenlandic leaders have consistently expressed their preference to maintain ties with Copenhagen rather than Washington.
Despite the disagreement over Greenland’s status, Rutte acknowledged Trump’s legitimate concerns about Arctic security. “I think he’s right. There is an issue with the Arctic region,” Rutte said. “There is an issue of collective security, because these sea lanes are opening up, and because the Chinese and the Russians are more and more active.”
The NATO chief’s warning comes as some European officials, including Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares, have floated the idea of creating an independent European military force. Rutte’s comments effectively pour cold water on such proposals, highlighting the practical impossibility of replacing American military capabilities and nuclear deterrence in the foreseeable future.
The situation underscores the complex interdependence between the United States and its European allies at a time of shifting geopolitical priorities, particularly in the strategically important Arctic region where climate change is rapidly altering the security landscape.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


10 Comments
Europe’s defense dependence on the US is a long-standing issue, but the Greenland tensions underscore how precarious that relationship has become. The NATO chief’s warnings are a sobering reminder that Europe must chart a more self-reliant course.
I agree. The Greenland dispute is just the tip of the iceberg. Europe needs to take concrete steps to bolster its own defense capacities and reduce its vulnerability to US whims. This could be a pivotal moment for European security policy.
Tough talk from the NATO chief, but he’s not wrong. Europe needs to boost its defense spending and capabilities if it wants to be less dependent on the US military. This could be a pivotal moment for European security policy.
The Trump administration’s interest in Greenland is certainly raising eyebrows. I wonder how this will impact broader US-Europe relations and the future of NATO cooperation. Europe may need to chart a more independent defense path.
You make a good point. The Greenland issue could be a catalyst for Europe to reevaluate its reliance on the US for defense. Increased European defense capabilities would strengthen the NATO alliance in the long run.
This is a concerning development for Europe’s defense capabilities. Reliance on the US nuclear umbrella and military support has been critical, but Europe needs to invest more in its own defense infrastructure.
The NATO chief’s comments highlight the challenging geopolitical landscape Europe faces. Strengthening European defense will be critical, but it’s a complex and costly undertaking. Striking the right balance with the US will be key.
The increasing geopolitical tensions over Greenland highlight the complex dynamics between the US and its European allies. It’s a stark reminder that Europe must bolster its own defense to reduce dependence on the US.
Interesting perspective from the NATO chief. While the US has been a vital partner, Europe does need to step up its own defense spending and capabilities to reduce vulnerability. This could be a pivotal moment for European security.
Interesting to see the NATO chief being so blunt about Europe’s defense limitations without the US. This is a wake-up call for European leaders to prioritize defense investment and capabilities. The Greenland issue is just the latest flashpoint.