Listen to the article
Immigration Enforcement Surge Ends in Twin Cities, Leaving Community Damage in its Wake
Federal officials have begun withdrawing forces from the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area following what the Department of Homeland Security described as its largest immigration enforcement operation ever. While authorities tout the operation as successful, state and local leaders say the damage to communities will be long-lasting.
The Trump administration’s “Operation Metro Surge” deployed thousands of immigration officers to the Twin Cities, but the initiative faced mounting criticism after two U.S. citizens, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, were fatally shot by federal officers. These deaths prompted operational changes and ultimately contributed to the drawdown announcement.
“This unprecedented federal escalation has upended daily life, eroded trust, and inflicted a whole lot of harm,” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said during a Friday press conference. He emphasized that Minneapolis taxpayers should not be responsible for costs created by federal actions.
City officials detailed significant financial impacts, including an additional $6 million in city expenses for January alone. The operation has reportedly cost small businesses tens of millions in lost revenue and led to thousands of hotel cancellations. Officials also estimate tens of thousands of residents, including school-aged children, now need support services like rent and food assistance.
The operation’s aftermath was visible at a makeshift shrine where Good was shot, as residents gathered for a vigil following the drawdown announcement. Local resident John Schnickel challenged officials’ claims about improved safety, noting bitterly, “They talk about how the murder rate is down, and yet they’ve added two people to it.”
Public sentiment appears to align with local criticism. A recent AP-NORC poll indicates most U.S. adults believe Trump’s immigration policies have gone too far.
Border czar Tom Homan told reporters Thursday that “extensive engagement” with local officials enabled the formal end to the operation. This marks a significant shift from earlier rhetoric, when the White House had accused Minnesota of protecting criminals from deportation through “sanctuary” policies.
President Trump’s approach to the situation changed noticeably after Pretti’s January 24 killing. Trump dispatched Homan to reduce tensions, suggesting he and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz were on a “similar wavelength” after weeks of public disagreements.
Homan highlighted new cooperation with state and local entities, including improved responsiveness to assistance requests and agreements on how jails handle deportable inmates. However, Sheriff Dawanna Witt, who oversees Hennepin County Jail serving Minneapolis, insisted Friday that no policies had changed at her facility, which traditionally requires judge-signed warrants before cooperating with immigration authorities.
Mayor Frey also contradicted suggestions of new agreements, stating firmly: “We do not enforce federal immigration law, period. We do not cooperate with ICE or any agency around enforcement of federal immigration law, period.”
While 700 federal officers were set to leave Minnesota immediately after last week’s announcement, more than 2,000 remained. Homan described a “significant drawdown” continuing through next week but didn’t specify final numbers. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Acting Director Todd Lyons told Congress the agency still seeks about 16,840 people in Minnesota with final removal orders.
The Twin Cities operation, which Trump reportedly pushed partly due to fraud allegations involving Somali residents, was part of broader immigration enforcement increases in Democratic-led jurisdictions including Los Angeles, Chicago, Charlotte, and New Orleans.
Despite the operation’s official conclusion, its effects continue to reverberate. The Trump administration faces challenges securing Department of Homeland Security funding before the end of the week, with Democratic lawmakers demanding restraints on immigration officers following the civilian deaths. Federal investigations into Pretti’s shooting remain ongoing.
Legal proceedings continue as well. A federal judge recently issued a temporary emergency order finding that immigrants detained at a Minnesota federal building face excessive barriers to legal counsel. Meanwhile, former CNN host Don Lemon pleaded not guilty Friday to federal civil rights charges related to a protest at a Minnesota church where an ICE official serves as pastor.
As federal forces prepare to depart, the question of who bears responsibility for repairing community damage remains contentious. Local leaders insist federal assistance is necessary for recovery, particularly when federal agencies caused the harm.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
15 Comments
This situation demonstrates the complex interplay between federal immigration policies and local communities. I’ll be following developments closely to see how the drawdown unfolds and the long-term impacts.
The deaths of two U.S. citizens during this operation are truly tragic. Thorough investigations and reforms to prevent such incidents in the future will be critical.
Absolutely, accountability and transparency around the use of force is paramount, especially when federal agents are operating in local communities.
This seems like a complex issue with impacts on both local communities and federal operations. I’m curious to learn more about the financial and social costs of this immigration enforcement surge and how the drawdown will affect the area moving forward.
It’s good to see the federal government responding to local concerns and drawing down this intense immigration operation. Rebuilding community trust will take time and continued dialogue.
The deaths of two U.S. citizens during this enforcement surge raise serious questions about the tactics and training of the federal agents involved. Reforms to protect public safety should be a priority.
While immigration enforcement is a sensitive topic, the high price tag for Minneapolis taxpayers is a valid issue that deserves attention. I’ll be interested to see how this situation evolves.
The damage to community trust and the high costs for local taxpayers are concerning. I hope the city and federal agencies can work together to address the fallout in a fair and constructive way.
This seems like a difficult balancing act between federal immigration priorities and local community needs. I hope the drawdown is managed carefully to mitigate further disruption.
This sounds like a complex situation with both political and practical implications. I appreciate the city officials being upfront about the financial impact on local budgets.
Agreed, the costs to taxpayers are an important consideration that shouldn’t be overlooked in these types of enforcement actions.
It will be interesting to see how the community responds as the federal presence is scaled back. Rebuilding trust and addressing the damage done will be an ongoing challenge.
Two tragic deaths as a result of this operation are deeply troubling. Increased transparency and accountability around the use of force will be crucial as the federal presence is scaled back.
The financial toll on Minneapolis taxpayers is a significant concern that deserves attention. Proper cost-sharing arrangements between local and federal entities should be explored.
While immigration is a sensitive topic, the human costs and community impacts of this operation cannot be ignored. I hope the drawdown is handled with empathy and care for all affected.