Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Alleged “Mastermind” of $250 Million Minnesota Fraud Scandal Wielded Power Through Threats and False Racism Claims

The alleged orchestrator behind Minnesota’s massive $250 million Feeding Our Future fraud scheme used extraordinary power and intimidation tactics to maintain control over a sprawling network of accomplices, according to prosecutors and witness testimony.

Aimee Bock, who founded the Feeding Our Future nonprofit in 2016, has been convicted on all counts she faced, including wire fraud, conspiracy and bribery in what has become one of the largest pandemic-related fraud cases in the United States.

Unlike her co-conspirators who purchased luxury homes, cars and overseas property, prosecutors described Bock as the scheme’s “gatekeeper,” controlling the approval and reimbursement processes that allowed the fraud to flourish rather than directly splurging on lavish items herself.

“Aimee Bock was a God,” testified cooperating witness Hanna Marekegn, owner of Brava Café, a meal site sponsored by Feeding Our Future. This testimony highlighted the extraordinary influence Bock wielded over the network, with operators understanding that refusing to comply with her demands would result in losing their contracts and funding.

Before the pandemic, Feeding Our Future operated modestly, handling approximately $3-4 million annually in federal child-nutrition reimbursements. However, when COVID-19 struck, emergency rule changes loosened oversight requirements, allowing sponsors to submit claims without normal verification procedures. This regulatory gap created an opportunity that Bock and her associates quickly exploited.

As executive director, Bock approved meal distribution sites—many of which were fabricated—and certified reimbursement claims submitted to the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE). Under her leadership, the nonprofit claimed to have served an astounding 91 million meals, fraudulently receiving nearly $250 million in federal funds. Later assessments have estimated the total impact closer to $300 million.

When state regulators attempted to halt suspicious payments in 2021, Feeding Our Future sued the MDE, alleging racial discrimination. A judge subsequently ordered the state to resume reimbursements, a ruling that prosecutors say allowed the scheme to expand dramatically.

“Bock lied to MDE and falsely accused state officials of racism to keep the money flowing,” prosecutors stated during the trial. They presented evidence showing Bock had approved 21 meal sites along a 1.8-mile stretch of Lake Street in Minneapolis, which collectively claimed to serve as many children as the entire Minneapolis school district.

When questioned about this improbable concentration of sites, Bock testified that several grocery stores in the area had been damaged during the George Floyd riots. “This large area became what’s known as a food desert,” she claimed.

Trial testimony revealed that operators paid kickbacks to Feeding Our Future employees or intermediaries to maintain their positions within the scheme. Those who refused to comply with inflated meal counts or kickback demands were cut off entirely from the funding stream.

While Bock may not have directly purchased mansions or luxury vehicles herself, court records show more than $1 million flowed to her longtime boyfriend, Empress Malcolm Watson Jr., who spent the money on travel, jewelry, vehicles and cash withdrawals. One trial exhibit showed Watson inside a Rolls-Royce with Bock standing nearby, while another displayed him with a Lamborghini alongside designer bags, jewelry and a Mercedes-Benz.

Watson has not been charged in connection with the Feeding Our Future cases, but in September he was charged with six tax-related felony offenses for allegedly underreporting income for 2020 and 2021, failing to file a return for 2022, and failing to pay over $64,000 in income taxes. He is currently held in Anoka County jail on an unrelated felony probation violation.

To date, at least 78 people have been indicted in this ongoing investigation, with many convicted defendants having spent their fraudulent gains on large homes, luxury vehicles and property in Kenya. Bock’s co-defendant, Salim Said, was also convicted on multiple charges, including wire fraud, bribery and money laundering.

The Feeding Our Future case represents one of the most significant fraud schemes to emerge from pandemic relief programs, exposing critical vulnerabilities in emergency funding oversight systems and the exploitation of accusations of racism to deflect legitimate regulatory scrutiny.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

13 Comments

  1. This case underscores the importance of rigorous auditing, transparency, and whistleblower protections in government aid programs. Preventing large-scale fraud and misuse of funds should be a top priority.

    • Amelia Hernandez on

      Well said. Maintaining public trust in these critical programs requires robust oversight and accountability measures, especially during times of crisis and heightened funding.

  2. Isabella Thompson on

    This case highlights the importance of robust oversight and control measures for large-scale aid programs. While the scale of the alleged fraud is shocking, it’s critical that the investigation sticks to the facts and avoids unnecessary politicization.

    • Well said. Pandemic-related fraud is a concerning trend, but the focus should remain on rooting out abuse and strengthening program safeguards, not partisan finger-pointing.

  3. William Hernandez on

    The alleged tactics of using false racism claims to maintain power and control are deeply concerning. If substantiated, this represents a disturbing abuse of sensitive social issues for personal gain.

  4. This case highlights the need for stronger safeguards and oversight mechanisms for government aid programs, especially during crises when funds are flowing rapidly. Preventing large-scale abuse should be a top priority.

    • Agreed. While the pandemic created an urgent need for swift aid distribution, lax controls appear to have enabled massive fraud. Improving program integrity should be a key lesson learned.

  5. Patricia Moore on

    Alleged fraud on such a massive scale is deeply concerning. Prosecutors will need to carefully examine the evidence and ensure justice is served, while avoiding unsubstantiated claims. Transparency and accountability should be the priorities here.

    • Agreed. Misusing government aid programs during a pandemic is a serious offense that should be thoroughly investigated. However, we must be cautious about making broad accusations without clear proof.

  6. Oliver Martinez on

    Alleged fraud on this scale is deeply troubling, but we must allow the legal process to play out and avoid rushing to judgment. A thorough, impartial investigation is crucial to upholding the integrity of these vital aid programs.

  7. As disturbing as the scale of this alleged fraud is, it’s important to reserve judgment until all the facts are presented. The investigation must be thorough and impartial to ensure justice is served properly.

  8. Linda Thompson on

    The alleged tactics of wielding power through intimidation and false claims of racism are extremely troubling. If proven true, this underscores the need for rigorous auditing and whistleblower protections in these types of programs.

    • Absolutely. Misusing race-based accusations to maintain control is a serious abuse of power that should be condemned. Transparency and accountability are crucial in cases like this.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.