Listen to the article
Mexico Accused of Conducting “Invisible Coup” Through US Diplomatic Network
Investigative author Peter Schweizer has alleged that the Mexican government is orchestrating a coordinated influence operation within the United States, utilizing its extensive diplomatic network, education programs, and migrant outreach initiatives in ways that exceed traditional diplomatic activities.
In his forthcoming book, “The Invisible Coup,” Schweizer claims Mexico employs “weaponized immigration” as a strategy to gain political leverage inside American borders. “Foreign powers are using migration as a weapon to undermine American sovereignty,” Schweizer told Fox News Digital. “Mexico is a clear example of this.”
Central to Schweizer’s allegations is Mexico’s unusually large diplomatic footprint in the United States: 53 consulates nationwide, significantly more than most U.S. allies maintain. These consular officials, according to Schweizer, have been involved in organizing political activities that he claims violate their diplomatic status.
“Those consular officials have been tied up in organizing political activity in the United States, which is a clear violation of their diplomatic status,” said Schweizer, who co-founded the conservative think tank Government Accountability Institute alongside former White House strategist Steve Bannon.
Schweizer specifically alleges that Mexican consular officials have supported anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protests in the U.S., pointing to instances where officials allegedly praised or claimed credit for community mobilization following immigration enforcement actions. While Mexican consulates routinely provide legal assistance to migrant communities after ICE operations—activities Mexican officials characterize as standard consular protection—critics argue these efforts cross the line into political activism.
The investigative author also points to Mexico’s “migrant legislators”—elected Mexican officials who reside in the United States representing Mexicans living abroad—as further evidence of cross-border political engagement. Though these officials don’t hold U.S. office, their participation in American advocacy events raises questions about foreign political activity on U.S. soil.
Another component of Mexico’s alleged influence campaign involves educational materials. Schweizer claims the Mexican government actively discourages assimilation among migrants living in the U.S. through Spanish-language textbooks distributed to American school districts from Los Angeles to Orlando.
“Those textbooks are designed to make sure that migrant children view themselves as Mexican first, not as Mexican–American,” Schweizer said. These materials, produced by Mexico’s state textbook authority, are primarily distributed through consulates, libraries, and community centers. According to Schweizer, they present a politicized version of American history that portrays the United States as an adversary, particularly regarding the Mexican-American War.
Schweizer further alleges coordination between Mexican diplomatic missions and U.S.-based advocacy groups that extends into American electoral politics. He referenced a 2024 meeting at the Mexican consulate in Oklahoma City that allegedly included Mexican officials and Democratic Party activists discussing how to shift political landscapes in key states.
“The conversation was about how California had been turned from red to blue, Arizona had been turned from red to blue, and how Republicans were going to ‘find out’ that they were planning to turn the whole country blue,” Schweizer claimed, citing what he described as a transcript of the meeting.
The allegations come at a sensitive time for U.S.-Mexico relations, with President Trump warning of tougher action against Mexican drug cartels and border security failures. Meanwhile, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has emphasized cooperation while defending Mexico’s sovereignty.
Schweizer also highlighted the economic dimension, noting: “More than $60 billion flows from the United States to Mexico in remittances. That’s a crucial lifeline.” In 2024, Mexico received approximately $62.5 billion from remittances sent from the U.S., according to economists with BBVA Research group.
The Mexican government has previously maintained that its consulates exist to provide services and protect the rights of Mexican nationals abroad, emphasizing its partnership with Washington on security and border enforcement.
When asked about appropriate responses to the alleged conduct, Schweizer advocated for a “zero-tolerance policy” that could include the expulsion of involved officials, particularly with midterm elections approaching. “We need to say enough is enough,” he concluded.
The Mexican embassy could not be reached for comment on Schweizer’s claims.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


16 Comments
This is a sensitive and politically charged issue. While the claims warrant serious investigation, we must be careful not to fan the flames of division or make hasty judgments. Constructive dialogue and impartial analysis are needed.
Well said. Keeping an even-handed and solution-oriented perspective will be important in navigating this situation effectively.
If true, these allegations would be very troubling. However, we should avoid jumping to conclusions and instead focus on gathering and evaluating all relevant information from credible sources before drawing any definitive conclusions.
Thoughtful approach. Maintaining objectivity and nuance is crucial when dealing with complex geopolitical issues like this.
Allegations of this nature, if true, would certainly raise concerns about the integrity of diplomatic relations. However, we should be cautious about jumping to conclusions without a thorough, impartial review of the evidence.
Absolutely, maintaining an objective and fact-based approach is critical when dealing with sensitive geopolitical issues.
This is a concerning report that merits further investigation. Undermining national sovereignty through the use of migration is a serious accusation. I hope the details in the book can be carefully examined to determine the validity of the claims.
Agreed, the allegations are quite serious and warrant a thorough, impartial review to establish the facts of the matter.
If these allegations are substantiated, it would be a troubling development that merits a serious policy response. However, we should avoid inflammatory rhetoric and focus on facts and diplomacy to address any potential issues.
Well said. Maintaining objectivity and diplomatic channels will be crucial in handling a sensitive situation like this appropriately.
This is a concerning allegation. If true, it would raise serious questions about the integrity of Mexico’s diplomatic activities in the US. I’d be interested to learn more about the specific evidence supporting these claims.
Agreed, the claims seem quite serious. Proper oversight and accountability are important when it comes to foreign diplomatic operations within a country’s borders.
Immigration and national sovereignty are sensitive and complex issues. I’ll reserve judgment on this matter until more details emerge and the evidence can be thoroughly evaluated. Maintaining constructive bilateral relations is important.
Thoughtful perspective. These types of allegations require careful and impartial examination before drawing conclusions.
This seems like a complex geopolitical issue that requires nuanced analysis. I’m curious to learn more about the specific evidence and claims made in the book, as well as Mexico’s perspective on the matter.
Agreed, getting a fuller picture of the situation from multiple angles is important before forming conclusions.