Listen to the article
The Department of Homeland Security arrested an armed man in Minneapolis Wednesday night who allegedly assaulted a federal immigration agent while carrying a firearm and ammunition, marking the second violent confrontation with federal agents in the city that day.
According to DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, the U.S. citizen arrived at ongoing protests with a gun and ammunition in a bag. “The individual threatened violence against law enforcement officers while pointing at his bag,” McLaughlin told Fox News Digital.
The confrontation escalated when law enforcement deployed crowd control measures to manage what officials described as “an increasingly volatile crowd.” The suspect allegedly kicked a metal smoke canister at officers and pushed one of them before being arrested for assault.
“While being arrested, he stated he had a firearm, which was located along with a box of ammunition. He was not carrying his concealed carry permit,” McLaughlin said, emphasizing that “this is not the peaceful protesting that the First Amendment protects.”
This incident occurred just hours after a separate and serious confrontation between federal agents and an undocumented Venezuelan migrant. In that earlier incident, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot the migrant in the leg after the individual allegedly attacked the agent with a shovel.
These confrontations have contributed to escalating tensions in Minneapolis, where protests and riots began following the death of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good, who was killed by an ICE agent during an encounter in the city last week.
The shooting of Good has sparked intense political debate. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem characterized Good as a “domestic terrorist,” claiming she used her vehicle as a weapon after obstructing ICE agents on a roadway. This characterization has been strongly contested by local officials.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey expressed his outrage over the incident, telling ICE to “get the f— out of Minneapolis” during a news conference. Similarly, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz criticized the Department of Homeland Security, dismissing Noem’s explanation as part of a “propaganda machine.”
As unrest continues, President Donald Trump has threatened federal intervention. On Thursday, he warned he would invoke the Insurrection Act if demonstrations continued to threaten federal officers.
“If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT,” Trump posted on his social media platform TRUTH Social.
The Insurrection Act, legislation dating back to 1807, would allow the president to deploy National Guard units to the area to restore order and reduce violence. The threat of invoking such a measure highlights the gravity of the situation in Minneapolis.
The incidents reflect broader tensions surrounding immigration enforcement in the United States. ICE operations have become increasingly contentious in many communities, with debates about appropriate enforcement tactics, local cooperation with federal authorities, and the treatment of migrants.
Law enforcement officials maintain that their agents are simply performing their duties in accordance with federal immigration laws, while critics argue that some enforcement actions are unnecessarily aggressive and disruptive to communities.
As demonstrations continue in Minneapolis, local officials have called for calm while also demanding accountability for the death of Good. The situation remains fluid, with federal authorities maintaining a presence in the city despite local opposition from some elected officials.
These developments unfold against the backdrop of ongoing national debates about immigration policy, law enforcement tactics, and the appropriate balance between federal authority and local governance in matters of immigration enforcement.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
This is a concerning development, with the alleged assault on the federal agent and the illegal firearm possession. While the right to protest is vital, it does not extend to physical attacks on law enforcement or the carrying of weapons. The authorities will need to respond firmly yet cautiously to maintain public safety.
You’re right, the use of violence against officers is completely unacceptable, even in the context of a protest. Peaceful demonstration is a fundamental right, but that doesn’t justify assaults or illegal firearms. Hopefully the situation can be resolved without further escalation.
Troubling to see the protests turn violent, with the alleged assault on the federal agent and the illegal firearm. While the First Amendment protects peaceful demonstrations, that does not extend to physical attacks on law enforcement or the carrying of weapons. The authorities will need to respond firmly yet cautiously to maintain order and public safety.
I agree, the use of force against officers is completely unacceptable, regardless of the context. Peaceful protest is a vital right, but that line is crossed when people start engaging in violence and illegal behavior. The authorities will need to act decisively to restore order.
Concerning to hear about the escalating tensions and violence at the protests. While people have the right to peacefully demonstrate, assaulting officers and carrying firearms illegally is unacceptable. The authorities will need to carefully balance public safety and First Amendment rights in these situations.
I agree, the use of force and weapons against law enforcement is extremely troubling. Peaceful protest is a fundamental right, but that line is crossed when people start attacking officers.
This is a concerning development, with the alleged assault on the federal agent and the illegal firearm possession. While the right to protest is crucial, it does not extend to physical attacks on law enforcement or the carrying of weapons. The authorities will need to respond firmly yet cautiously to maintain public safety and uphold the law.
You make a good point. Peaceful protest is a fundamental right, but that doesn’t justify violence against officers or the illegal possession of firearms. The authorities will need to strike a balance between protecting free speech and ensuring public order.
This is a troubling development, with the alleged assault on the federal agent and the illegal firearm possession. While the right to protest is crucial, it does not justify physical attacks on law enforcement or the carrying of weapons. The authorities will need to respond firmly yet cautiously to maintain public safety and uphold the law.
You raise a fair point. Peaceful protest is a fundamental right, but that doesn’t extend to violence against officers or the illegal possession of firearms. The authorities will need to strike a careful balance between protecting free speech and ensuring public order.
Concerning to see the protests escalate to alleged violence against a federal agent and the illegal possession of a firearm. While the First Amendment protects peaceful demonstrations, that does not extend to physical attacks on law enforcement or the carrying of weapons. The authorities will need to respond firmly yet cautiously to maintain order and public safety.
I agree, the use of force against officers is completely unacceptable, regardless of the context. Peaceful protest is a vital right, but that line is crossed when people start engaging in violence and illegal behavior. Hopefully the situation can be resolved without further escalation.
Worrying to see the protests turn violent, with the alleged assault on the federal agent and the illegal firearm. While the First Amendment protects peaceful demonstrations, that does not extend to physical attacks on law enforcement. The authorities will need to act decisively to restore order.
I agree, the use of force against officers is completely unacceptable, regardless of the context. Peaceful protest is a fundamental right, but that line is crossed when people start engaging in violence and illegal behavior.
This is a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. Peaceful protest is crucial, but the presence of firearms and violence against officers is a serious escalation that jeopardizes public safety. The authorities will need to respond firmly yet cautiously to maintain order.
You raise a good point. There’s a balance to be struck between protecting the right to protest and ensuring public safety. Hopefully the situation can be de-escalated without further violence on either side.