Listen to the article
New York City’s newly appointed housing official has come under scrutiny for past comments criticizing homeownership and suggesting it poses a barrier to tenant rights advancement. Cea Weaver, named director of the revived Mayor’s Office to Protect Tenants on January 1 through an executive order signed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani, made controversial remarks during a 2021 podcast appearance that have resurfaced since her appointment.
During the September 2021 episode of the “Bad Faith podcast,” Weaver stated that “White, middle-class homeowners are a huge problem for a renter justice movement” and argued that housing organizers must “undermine the institution of homeownership” to advance tenant protections.
These statements have drawn renewed attention as Weaver now holds formal executive authority over tenant policy and enforcement throughout the city. Her appointment was part of Mamdani’s first-day initiatives, which included revitalizing the tenant protection office that had been dormant in recent years.
Weaver’s comments targeted not just large corporate landlords but specifically homeowners as obstacles to progressive housing reform. “I think the reality is that a lot of the people who are pushing back on the eviction moratorium and more rental assistance are not corporate landlords,” she said during the podcast. “They are homeowners who feel as though an eviction moratorium is an attack on their rights as a property owner.”
The housing official further elaborated that homeownership has become the primary source of stability in the United States due to gaps in social programs, creating what she described as a “difficult organizing situation” for housing activists. “Unless we can undermine the institution of homeownership and seek to provide stability in other ways, it’s a really difficult organizing situation we find ourselves in,” Weaver stated.
Her views on evictions framed them as power struggles rather than economic issues, suggesting landlords resist the concept that tenants could remain in properties they “consider themselves to own.”
Beyond the podcast appearance, Weaver has drawn additional scrutiny for past social media posts. In an August 2019 post on X (formerly Twitter) which was later deleted but resurfaced by Fox News Digital, she wrote that “private property including and kind of ESPECIALLY homeownership is a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as ‘wealth building’ public policy.”
During the same podcast interview, Weaver advocated for several progressive housing policies, including universal rent control, the right to form tenant unions, blocking evictions, and funding rental assistance through higher taxes on wealthy individuals. She suggested broader government programs could “chip away at homeownership” by providing stability through alternative means.
Weaver’s appointment has proven particularly controversial as she was previously rejected for a city position by the New York City Council, according to reports. Now, through Mamdani’s executive appointment, she holds significant power over housing policy without requiring council confirmation.
On her first day in the role, Weaver joined Mayor Mamdani in announcing city intervention in the bankruptcy proceedings of Pinnacle Group, a landlord with a history of housing violations and tenant complaints, according to City Hall.
The mayor’s office has not responded to media inquiries about whether Mamdani stands by Weaver’s past comments regarding homeownership and her characterization of it as problematic for tenant advocacy.
New York City faces an ongoing housing crisis with soaring rents and limited affordable housing options, making tenant protection policies particularly consequential for the city’s over 5.4 million renters, who represent about two-thirds of the city’s population.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
This is a concerning development. The housing czar’s statements seem to unfairly target a specific demographic – white, middle-class homeowners – as the problem, rather than taking a more holistic view of the housing challenges facing the city. Homeownership should not be vilified.
I’m worried this could lead to a further divide between homeowners and renters, when what’s needed is collaboration and compromise to find solutions that work for everyone. Homeowners shouldn’t be painted as the enemy, even if reforms are needed.
While I understand the desire to address tenant issues, the housing czar’s remarks about undermining homeownership are troubling. Homeownership is a key part of wealth-building for many families, and shouldn’t be dismissed as a ‘problem’ to be solved. A more balanced approach is needed.
Agreed. Attacking homeowners as an obstacle to reform is counterproductive and risks further polarizing the housing debate. We need constructive dialogue and solutions that work for both renters and homeowners, not divisive rhetoric that sets groups against each other.
The housing czar’s statements about undermining homeownership are alarming and seem to unfairly target a specific group. While tenant rights are important, homeownership is a critical part of wealth-building and financial security for many families. A more balanced, nuanced approach is needed.
I agree, this is a concerning development that risks further polarizing the housing debate. Homeowners shouldn’t be vilified as obstacles to reform. We need solutions that work for both renters and homeowners, not divisive rhetoric that sets groups against each other.
This is a concerning statement from the housing official. While tenant protections are important, undermining homeownership seems counterproductive and divisive. Homeowners are not inherently obstacles to reform, and their interests should be balanced with those of renters.
I agree, a nuanced approach is needed that considers the perspectives of all stakeholders, not just one group. Homeownership is a cornerstone of the American dream and needs to be respected, even as we work to improve housing affordability and tenant rights.
The housing czar’s remarks about white, middle-class homeowners being a ‘huge problem’ are troubling. Homeownership is a fundamental part of the American dream and shouldn’t be undermined, even as we work to improve tenant protections. A more balanced, inclusive approach is needed to address housing challenges.
Absolutely. Targeting homeowners as the enemy, rather than addressing the systemic issues, is counterproductive and risks further dividing the housing debate. We need constructive solutions that bring all stakeholders together, not divisive rhetoric that sets groups against each other.
The housing czar’s comments about white, middle-class homeowners being a ‘huge problem’ are concerning. Homeownership is a core American value that shouldn’t be undermined, even as we work to improve tenant protections and housing affordability. A more inclusive, balanced approach is needed.
I share your worries. Singling out a specific demographic as the problem, rather than addressing the systemic housing challenges, seems misguided. We need solutions that bring all stakeholders together, not divide them further. Homeowners shouldn’t be treated as the enemy in this debate.