Listen to the article
One Year Into Trump’s Second Term: Bold Actions and Controversies Mark Administration’s Approach
In the year since Donald Trump’s second inauguration, the president has implemented sweeping policy changes that have transformed the federal government, deployed Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to major American cities, and faced numerous challenges on both domestic and international fronts.
White House observers note a marked difference in Trump’s leadership style compared to his first term. “One of the major themes of Trump’s second first term is just this sort of determination,” says AP White House reporter Darlene Superville. “When he was president the first time, Donald Trump was coming to Washington from being a businessman. He’d never really been in politics before.”
This time, Trump has surrounded himself with trusted allies who can implement his agenda efficiently. This strategic staffing approach has enabled the administration to move quickly on key campaign promises.
Among the most significant initiatives is the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), spearheaded by Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. Under Musk’s direction, teams of analysts scrutinized federal departments, identifying areas for cost reduction and job elimination. The results have been dramatic, with thousands of federal workers terminated and significant spending cuts implemented, though falling short of Musk’s ambitious $2 billion target.
The president’s focus on urban crime has manifested in controversial deployments of National Guard troops to several major cities, beginning with Washington, D.C., and extending to Chicago, Portland, and New Orleans. “He sees sending the guard into these cities as part of that bullet item on his agenda,” Superville explains. Months later, uniformed personnel remain visible on Washington streets and in train stations, despite Trump’s contested claims about crime reduction.
Immigration enforcement has emerged as perhaps the most polarizing aspect of Trump’s second term. The administration has conducted extensive ICE operations in Minnesota, particularly targeting the Somali community amid allegations of fraud. These actions have sparked widespread protests and intense criticism, especially following the fatal shooting of an American woman by an ICE agent during an operation.
“He wanted to carry out the largest mass deportation ever in U.S. history,” Superville notes. “But one of the things that people around the country are seeing and also objecting to is just the sheer force of this effort.”
The aggressive immigration tactics have weakened Trump’s position even among his supporters. A recent AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found just 38 percent of adults approve of the president’s handling of immigration, with approval among Republicans dropping twelve percentage points over the past year.
Despite campaigning as a peacemaker in global conflicts, Trump has struggled to deliver on several key foreign policy promises. His pledge to end Russia’s war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office remains unfulfilled nearly a year later. While he received initial praise for proposing a plan to resolve tensions between Israel and Gaza, the proposal has yet to be fully adopted.
Meanwhile, the administration has expanded American military involvement overseas, particularly in Venezuela, where U.S. forces have conducted strikes against suspected drug smugglers and executed a surprising overnight raid into Caracas. Trump has suggested the United States will play a major role in controlling Venezuelan oil sales, prompting criticism from lawmakers concerned about unauthorized military actions abroad.
The president has also pursued an unusual interest in acquiring Greenland, citing national security concerns, though Denmark and Greenland officials have firmly rejected these overtures.
Domestically, Trump has faced pressure regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case files. Initially reluctant to release these documents despite their importance to his base, the president changed course only after Congress moved to force the Justice Department’s hand through legislation.
Economic management remains a challenge for the administration. Despite Trump’s claims of record-breaking growth and defeated inflation, only 37 percent of Americans approve of his economic leadership, according to recent polling. His frequent criticism of Federal Reserve Chairman Jay Powell and demands for lower interest rates have created tensions with the independent central bank.
In a departure from tradition, Trump has taken personal interest in White House renovations typically overseen by the first lady. Major projects have included redecorating the Oval Office with gold accents and presidential portraits, paving over the Rose Garden to create a patio, renovating the Lincoln bedroom bathroom with marble finishes, and installing massive flagpoles on the White House grounds.
Looking ahead to the 2026 midterm elections, Trump faces the historical pattern of the president’s party losing congressional seats. With narrow GOP majorities in both chambers, Democrats need only flip four Senate seats to regain control. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer has expressed optimism about his party’s chances, telling the AP that “the path toward actually doing that is now much wider than it has been.”
Trump is actively working to help Republicans maintain control of Congress, employing unconventional tactics such as encouraging Republican-led states to redraw congressional districts ahead of schedule. During a recent address to House Republicans, he bluntly warned that Democratic victories would lead to investigations of his administration and potentially impeachment proceedings.
As his second term approaches its midpoint, Trump’s determination to implement his agenda has produced significant changes in government operations and American society, though not without substantial controversy and resistance.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


16 Comments
It will be crucial to see how Trump’s ‘determination’ and policy changes impact the mining, metals, and energy industries during his second term. Commodity prices, project timelines, and regulatory environments could all shift significantly.
The mining and energy sectors are closely tied to geopolitics and economic trends. I’m curious to see if Trump’s second-term policies help or hinder these industries’ growth and innovation.
The mining and energy sectors are always closely watched for signals about the broader economy. Trump’s second term initiatives, like the new Department of Government Efficiency, could have ripple effects across these industries.
It will be important to monitor how the mining, metals, and energy companies respond to Trump’s policy changes and the shift in government oversight under this second term.
While I have mixed feelings about Trump’s policies, the mining and energy sectors will be closely watching his administration’s actions. Increased government efficiency could benefit these industries, but also raises concerns about environmental protections.
The new Department of Government Efficiency under Elon Musk’s leadership will be an interesting development to follow. I wonder how it will balance business interests with public interests in the mining and energy sectors.
Interesting to see Trump taking a more determined approach in his second term. I wonder how his policies and leadership style will impact the mining and energy sectors, which are closely tied to the economy and geopolitics.
The creation of the Department of Government Efficiency under Elon Musk’s direction could have significant implications for the mining and energy industries. I’m curious to see how this agency will streamline regulations and processes.
As an investor in mining and energy equities, I’ll be closely following how Trump’s second-term agenda impacts regulations, operational costs, and growth opportunities in these sectors. Increased efficiency could be a double-edged sword.
The creation of the Department of Government Efficiency is an intriguing development. I wonder if it will streamline permitting and approvals for new mining and energy projects, or if environmental protections will be compromised.
The mining and energy sectors are closely watched by investors, as they’re sensitive to political and economic changes. I’ll be following how Trump’s second term policies affect commodity prices and company operations in these industries.
The article mentions Trump surrounded himself with trusted allies to implement his agenda efficiently. This could accelerate changes in regulations and oversight for mining, energy, and related sectors.
The mining, metals, and energy sectors are closely linked to economic and geopolitical trends. Trump’s policy changes in his second term will be closely watched by investors and industry stakeholders to assess the impacts on commodity prices, project development, and shareholder returns.
Increased government efficiency could benefit the mining and energy industries, but the tradeoffs with environmental protection will be an important consideration. I’ll be monitoring how the new Department of Government Efficiency navigates these priorities.
Trump’s ‘determination’ in his second term could have significant ramifications for the mining, metals, and energy industries. Increased government efficiency is appealing, but the balance with environmental safeguards will be critical to monitor.
As an energy sector analyst, I’ll be closely tracking how the new Department of Government Efficiency under Elon Musk impacts regulations, project timelines, and investment decisions for mining, oil & gas, and alternative energy companies.