Listen to the article
Justice Department Corrects Trump Pardons After Signature Discrepancies Emerge
The Justice Department quietly replaced online copies of presidential pardons this week following public scrutiny over identical signatures appearing on multiple clemency documents signed by President Donald Trump. The agency attributed the issue to a “technical error” after digital forensic experts confirmed the striking similarities.
The controversy began when online observers noted that several pardons dated November 7 – including those granted to former New York Mets player Darryl Strawberry, former Tennessee House Speaker Glen Casada, and former New York police sergeant Michael McMahon – contained signatures that appeared to be exact duplicates of one another.
“A basic axiom of handwriting identification science is that no two signatures are going to bear the exact same design features in every aspect,” explained Tom Vastrick, president of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, who reviewed the documents at the request of The Associated Press.
Within hours of the online speculation, the administration uploaded new versions of the pardons featuring signatures with distinct variations. Justice Department spokesperson Chad Gilmartin attributed the discrepancies to “staffing issues caused by the Democrat shutdown” where “one of the signatures President Trump personally signed was mistakenly uploaded multiple times.”
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson reinforced that Trump “signed each one of these pardons by hand as he does with all pardons,” dismissing the controversy as a “non-story.”
The signature discrepancies take on additional political significance given Trump’s vocal criticism of President Biden’s use of an autopen for executive documents. Trump has prominently displayed a picture of an autopen device in place of Biden’s portrait in a newly created “Presidential Walk of Fame” along the West Wing colonnade.
Just last month, Republican allies in Congress released a critical report of Biden that characterized his autopen usage as among “the greatest scandals in U.S. history.” The House Oversight Committee’s report claimed Biden’s autopen practice cast doubt on all his official actions and called for a full investigation by Attorney General Pam Bondi.
In response to the Trump signature issue, Rep. Dave Min, a California Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, called for a similar investigation, suggesting “we need to better understand who is actually in charge of the White House, because Trump seems to be slipping.”
Legal experts maintain that regardless of how the documents were signed, the pardons remain valid. “The key to pardon validity is whether the president intended to grant the pardon,” noted Frank Bowman, a legal historian and professor emeritus at the University of Missouri School of Law. “Any re-signing is an obvious, and rather silly, effort to avoid comparison to Biden.”
This latest controversy emerges during a flurry of clemency actions by Trump, who recently pardoned crypto billionaire Changpeng Zhao – someone Trump later claimed not to know during a “60 Minutes” interview where he characterized the case as “a Biden witch hunt.”
Critics have noted that Trump’s approach to pardons has largely bypassed the traditional Justice Department review process that historically involved nonpolitical personnel. Many of his pardons have gone to political allies, campaign donors, and individuals claiming to be victims of a “weaponized” Justice Department.
The three November 7 pardon recipients represent diverse cases. Casada, the former Republican Tennessee House Speaker, was sentenced in September to three years in prison for a scheme to win taxpayer-funded mail business. Strawberry, the 1983 National League Rookie of the Year, was convicted in the 1990s of tax evasion and drug charges, with Trump citing his post-career embrace of Christianity in the pardon. McMahon, the former NYPD sergeant, received an 18-month sentence this spring for acting as a foreign agent for China in what a judge described as “a campaign of transnational repression.”
When contacted about the signature discrepancies, McMahon’s attorney Lawrence Lustberg indicated he was unaware the pardon documents had been replaced, stating, “It is and has always been our understanding that President Trump granted Mr. McMahon his pardon.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
This raises some red flags about the integrity of the pardon process under the previous administration. The Justice Department should provide a thorough explanation for the signature discrepancies.
Interesting development. It’s concerning if the president’s signature was duplicated on official pardons. I wonder what the explanation is and whether there are any implications for the validity of those clemency decisions.
This seems like a concerning lack of oversight and attention to detail on such an important presidential power. Proper signature verification should be a basic requirement for any official documents.
It’s troubling to see such carelessness with the presidential pardon power. Even minor irregularities like this can undermine public trust in the system. I hope the DOJ investigation gets to the bottom of it.
While the Justice Department claims it was a technical error, the public deserves more details on how this happened and what steps are being taken to ensure the validity of presidential pardons going forward.
The identical signatures on these pardons are quite puzzling. I’d be curious to know more about the technical error the Justice Department claims led to this issue. Transparency on the process is important.
The discrepancies in Trump’s signatures on these pardons are quite concerning. The DOJ needs to be fully transparent about how this occurred and what’s being done to prevent similar issues in the future.