Listen to the article
The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against the University of California on Tuesday, alleging that UCLA failed to protect Jewish employees from antisemitic harassment during pro-Palestinian protests that swept across the campus in 2023 and 2024.
The 81-page lawsuit, filed in California, represents a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s ongoing campaign targeting universities it claims have been insufficiently responsive to antisemitism. Federal officials accuse UCLA of neglecting to discipline individuals involved in campus protests, including dozens arrested in 2024 for refusing to leave an encampment.
“The United States will now do what UC has thus far failed to do: protect Jewish and Israeli employees” from antisemitic harassment, the lawsuit states. While the legal action targets the entire University of California system, which comprises ten campuses, the allegations focus specifically on UCLA.
The federal complaint centers largely on a 2024 protest encampment that officials claim blocked Jewish employees and students from accessing parts of the campus and featured antisemitic signs and chants. Tensions escalated when counterprotesters attacked the encampment one night, throwing traffic cones and using pepper spray. The confrontation resulted in more than a dozen injuries before police intervention. The following day, authorities arrested over 200 people who defied orders to vacate the area.
According to the lawsuit, UCLA violated its own policies by tolerating the encampment and failed to take disciplinary action against students, faculty, or staff engaged in antisemitic behavior. “UCLA’s administration turned a blind eye to — and at times facilitated — grossly antisemitic acts and systematically ignored cries for help from its own terrified Jewish and Israeli employees,” the Justice Department alleges.
The government’s legal action seeks a court order forcing UCLA to enforce its anti-discrimination policies and to award damages to Jewish employees who experienced a hostile work environment, though the lawsuit does not specify an amount.
In response to the allegations, UCLA stated it has implemented “concrete and significant steps” to strengthen campus security, enforce policies, and combat antisemitism. “Antisemitism is abhorrent and has no place at UCLA or elsewhere,” said Mary Osako, UCLA’s vice chancellor for strategic communications, in a statement that did not directly address the federal lawsuit.
The university highlighted several initiatives it has undertaken to improve campus safety and inclusivity, including establishing an Office of Campus and Community Safety and developing new policies to manage campus protests. UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk, whose Jewish father and grandparents fled Nazi Germany for Mexico and whose wife is the daughter of a Holocaust survivor, has launched a specific initiative to combat antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias on campus.
“We stand firmly by the decisive actions we have taken to combat antisemitism in all its forms, and we will vigorously defend our efforts and our unwavering commitment to providing a safe, inclusive environment for all members of our community,” Osako added.
This lawsuit follows earlier action by the Trump administration, which previously determined that UCLA had failed to protect Jewish students. Last year, the university reached a $6 million settlement with three Jewish students and a Jewish professor who sued the institution. However, the new federal lawsuit contends that the harm to Jewish and Israeli employees “goes much deeper” than the situations addressed by that settlement.
UCLA is one of few public universities targeted in the Trump administration’s campaign focusing primarily on elite private institutions accused of liberal and antisemitic bias. Last summer, federal officials sought $1 billion from UCLA as part of a settlement to end federal scrutiny and cut hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding, though a federal judge ordered the money restored in September. In November, that same judge barred the federal government from fining the university.
The legal battle highlights the ongoing tensions between academic institutions’ handling of campus protests and federal enforcement of civil rights protections in educational settings.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
13 Comments
This lawsuit underscores the complexities universities face in managing heated political protests and protecting vulnerable groups from harassment. The outcome will provide valuable guidance on how institutions can navigate these sensitive issues while respecting principles of free expression.
Agreed. The case will likely set an important precedent for how universities approach balancing free speech and campus safety in the future.
This case highlights the delicate balance universities must strike between upholding free speech and ensuring an inclusive, safe environment for all. The outcome could have significant implications for how campuses handle controversial protests and allegations of discrimination.
Absolutely. The courts’ interpretation of the university’s responsibilities in this matter will be closely watched by institutions across the country.
The allegations of antisemitism and the university’s response are concerning. However, it’s important to consider the full context and details before drawing conclusions. Maintaining academic freedom while promoting diversity and inclusion is an ongoing challenge for many higher education institutions.
Allegations of antisemitism on college campuses are deeply troubling and demand a thorough, impartial investigation. The university’s actions and the broader context will be crucial in determining the appropriate response to protect all students and staff.
Campuses should be places where diverse views can be expressed, but not at the expense of creating a hostile environment for any group. This lawsuit highlights the delicate line universities must walk to uphold principles of free speech and inclusion.
The allegations of antisemitism and the university’s response are concerning. However, the full context and details of the situation will be critical in determining the appropriate course of action. Upholding the rights of all students and staff while maintaining a safe, inclusive environment is an ongoing challenge for higher education.
This case raises important questions about the balance between free speech, campus security, and protecting vulnerable groups from harassment. It will be interesting to see how the courts interpret the university’s responsibilities in this complex situation.
Agreed. The outcome could set an important precedent for how universities address controversial protests and allegations of discrimination on their campuses.
This lawsuit highlights the complex challenges universities face in balancing free speech and ensuring a safe, inclusive environment for all. While the alleged antisemitic harassment is concerning, the university’s response will be crucial in setting a precedent for addressing such issues sensitively and equitably.
Indeed, these situations require a nuanced approach to protect all students and staff from discrimination while upholding fundamental rights. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for how campuses navigate these delicate matters.
Allegations of antisemitism on college campuses are worrying and demand a thorough investigation. However, the university’s perspective and actions should also be carefully considered before drawing conclusions. Maintaining academic freedom while ensuring safety and inclusion is an ongoing challenge for many institutions.