Listen to the article
Federal Judge Allows Massachusetts Offshore Wind Project to Continue Despite Trump Administration Freeze
A federal judge in Boston ruled Tuesday that the nearly completed Vineyard Wind project can proceed with construction, dealing another blow to the Trump administration’s attempt to halt major East Coast offshore wind developments on national security grounds.
Judge Brian Murphy suspended the administration’s stop-work order for the Massachusetts project, citing potential economic losses from delays and the developers’ likelihood of success on their legal claims. The decision makes Vineyard Wind the fourth of five major offshore wind projects that courts have allowed to continue after the administration froze them days before Christmas.
“Vineyard Wind will focus on working in coordination with its contractors, the federal government, and other relevant stakeholders and authorities to safely restart activities,” company spokesperson Craig Gilvarg said in a statement.
The Massachusetts project, a joint venture between Avangrid and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, is located 15 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket. Already 95% complete and partially operational, the development currently produces nearly 600 megawatts of power for the New England electric grid. Before the pause, Vineyard Wind was on track for completion by late March, with 62 turbines generating 800 megawatts—enough clean electricity to power approximately 400,000 homes.
Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell emphasized the project’s importance, stating it is “essential to ensuring the state can lower costs, meet rising energy demand, advance its climate goals and sustain thousands of good-paying jobs.”
The ruling follows similar decisions by federal judges who previously allowed three other major projects to restart: Revolution Wind (for Rhode Island and Connecticut, developed by Danish company Orsted), Empire Wind (for New York, by Norwegian company Equinor), and Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (by Dominion Energy Virginia). Only Orsted’s Sunrise Wind project for New York remains paused, with legal proceedings still pending.
Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond Law School professor tracking the lawsuits, noted that judges have consistently determined the government failed to demonstrate an imminent national security risk warranting construction halts.
U.S. Senator Edward Markey (D-Massachusetts) welcomed the judge’s decision, calling it “an important step in the process to fight back against the Trump administration’s lawless attacks against our union jobs, grid security, and energy affordability.”
The administration has been vague about its specific national security concerns. Court documents show Matthew Giacona, acting director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), reviewed classified documents in November discussing potential impacts to early warning monitoring and radar systems from offshore wind projects. Giacona determined Vineyard Wind’s ongoing activities did not “adequately provide for the protection of national security interests” without mitigation measures, though he was “not aware of any measures that would mitigate the national security risks.”
Given Vineyard Wind’s advanced construction status, BOEM had allowed partial operations during the suspension while consulting with defense officials and project owners.
President Trump has repeatedly criticized offshore wind energy since returning to the White House, describing wind farms as “losers” that lose money, destroy landscapes, and kill birds. His administration’s skepticism contrasts with research from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory showing states with substantial utility-scale wind and solar often enjoy low electricity prices, though some implementing mandatory renewable energy programs have experienced price increases.
The Vineyard Wind project faced additional controversy after fiberglass fragments from a broken turbine blade washed onto Nantucket beaches in July 2024 during peak tourist season. Manufacturer GE Vernova agreed to pay $10.5 million to compensate affected island businesses.
White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers has defended the construction pause as necessary to protect national security, while Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose family famously opposed an earlier wind project near their Cape Cod estate, has specifically criticized Vineyard Wind.
The court’s decision represents a significant victory for the offshore wind industry and renewable energy advocates as legal battles over the administration’s energy policies continue to unfold.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


19 Comments
While I support the development of offshore wind, I’m concerned about the potential impacts on local fishing communities and marine ecosystems. These issues need to be carefully studied and addressed.
That’s a fair point. Any large-scale infrastructure project should prioritize minimizing disruptions to existing industries and protecting the environment.
Offshore wind is becoming an increasingly attractive option for coastal states looking to diversify their energy mix. The technology continues to advance and costs come down.
Absolutely. Offshore wind is poised for major growth in the coming years as more projects get the green light.
I’m hopeful that the Vineyard Wind project can serve as a model for responsible, sustainable offshore wind development along the East Coast. This is an important step forward.
This is a positive development, but I wonder if the Trump administration’s attempts to block the project will have lasting impacts on investor confidence in the offshore wind sector.
That’s a good question. Regulatory uncertainty and political interference can definitely create challenges for large-scale renewable energy projects.
This is great news for the offshore wind industry in Massachusetts. A federal judge’s decision to allow the Vineyard Wind project to continue is a win for renewable energy development and the fight against climate change.
Agreed. The Trump administration’s attempts to halt these projects were misguided and out of step with the urgent need to transition to clean energy sources.
This is an important victory for the Biden administration’s clean energy agenda. Renewable projects like Vineyard Wind will be critical to meeting climate goals.
While it’s good the project can now move forward, I wonder what the long-term impacts on the local environment and wildlife will be. Offshore wind farms can sometimes have unintended consequences.
That’s a fair point. Environmental assessments and monitoring will be crucial to ensure the project is developed responsibly and with minimal disruption.
I’m curious to see how this project progresses now that the legal hurdle has been cleared. Offshore wind has so much potential to provide clean, reliable power along the East Coast.
Yes, the Vineyard Wind project is an important step forward. I hope this encourages more investment and development in offshore wind across the region.
The Trump administration’s attempts to block this project were likely driven more by political motivations than genuine national security concerns. I’m glad the courts saw through that.
I’m skeptical that this project will be completed on time and on budget given the legal challenges it has faced. Large-scale infrastructure projects often face delays and cost overruns.
That’s a valid concern. Careful project management and oversight will be crucial to keeping the Vineyard Wind development on track.
This is an important step forward for the offshore wind industry in the US. I hope it paves the way for more projects to be developed along the East Coast.
Agreed. Diversifying our energy mix with more renewable sources like offshore wind is crucial for reducing emissions and combating climate change.