Listen to the article
Federal Judge Orders Voice of America Revival, Administration Appeals
In a forceful ruling this week, a federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to restore the Voice of America (VOA) to full operations after the international broadcasting service was effectively gutted over the past year. The administration, however, has already filed notice to appeal the decision, setting the stage for a protracted legal battle over the agency’s future.
U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled on March 7 that Kari Lake, President Trump’s appointee to oversee the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), lacked the authority to reduce VOA to a skeleton operation. Lamberth’s decision mandates that hundreds of VOA employees who have been on paid leave for the past year be reinstated immediately.
“Lake has repeatedly thumbed her nose at laws mandating VOA’s operation,” Lamberth wrote in his decision.
The Voice of America was established during World War II to provide objective news to countries without free press traditions. Before Trump’s return to office last year, VOA broadcast in 49 different languages and reached an estimated 362 million people worldwide. Under the current administration, operations have been drastically scaled back, with services now limited to Iran, Afghanistan, China, North Korea, and regions with large Kurdish populations.
The Trump team has argued that government-run news sources like VOA and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty represent bloated government and have pushed for coverage more favorable to the administration’s positions. This stance has raised concerns about the agency’s congressionally mandated mission to provide objective and unbiased news.
VOA director Michael Abramowitz expressed hope for rebuilding, noting that “legislators in both parties understand the need for a strong operation and have set aside enough funding for the job to be done.” He called for all parties to work together to strengthen the agency.
The White House, however, has signaled continued resistance. “President Trump was elected to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse across the administration, including the Voice of America — and efforts to improve efficiency at USAGM have been a tremendous success,” said White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly. “This will not be the final say on the matter.”
Patsy Widakuswara, VOA’s White House bureau chief and a plaintiff in the lawsuit, acknowledged the challenges ahead: “Restoring the physical infrastructure is going to take a lot of money and some time but it can be done. What is more difficult is recovering from the trauma that our newsroom has gone through.”
The administration’s recent appointment of Christopher Wallace, an executive from conservative network Newsmax with previous experience at Fox News Channel, as VOA’s new deputy director has raised additional questions about the agency’s future direction. Notably, VOA director Abramowitz was not informed of Wallace’s appointment until it was publicly announced.
While Judge Lamberth has ordered more than a thousand employees on leave to return to work, many have likely moved on to other jobs or retired during the past year. The judge also noted he lacked authority to reinstate hundreds of terminated independent contractors.
Steve Herman, a former VOA White House bureau chief now at the University of Mississippi, expressed pessimism about a full restoration under the current administration. “I think it’s going to be very difficult,” Herman said.
The White House has nominated Sarah Rogers, the undersecretary of state for public diplomacy, to lead USAGM, potentially placing the agency more firmly under administration control. Her nomination requires Senate approval.
Despite these challenges, Congress included $200 million for VOA operations in the February budget bill. While this represents about a 25% reduction from previous funding, it signals bipartisan support for the agency’s mission.
Former VOA director David Ensor (2010-2014) highlighted the agency’s historical importance, citing its significant reach in countries like Iran, where between a quarter and a third of households tuned in weekly. “I believe in Voice of America as a news organization and as a voice of America,” Ensor said. “It was important, and it can be again.”
As reinstated employees prepare to return to work, the future of this 80-year-old institution hangs in the balance, caught between its traditional mission of objective journalism and an administration seeking to reshape its purpose and scope.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
The administration’s appeal of the judge’s order is concerning. The VOA’s credibility and reach are critical, and I hope its operations can be restored and protected from political interference.
The judge’s ruling seems to be a strong affirmation of the importance of maintaining the VOA’s mandate and operations. However, the administration’s appeal raises concerns about potential political interference.
The Voice of America has played a critical role in providing objective news and information to countries without a free press. I hope the administration respects the court’s decision and works to uphold the agency’s independence and mission.
Agreed. The VOA’s ability to operate without political interference is essential for maintaining its credibility and reach around the world.
This is a complex issue with important implications for global press freedom. I hope the courts uphold the VOA’s independence and ability to fulfill its mission of providing objective news and information.
This dispute highlights the ongoing tensions between the administration and independent media outlets. It will be important to follow how this legal battle unfolds and what it means for the future of U.S. international broadcasting.
Absolutely. The outcome could have broader implications for press freedoms and the flow of information globally.
I’m curious to see how this case progresses and what it might mean for the broader landscape of international media and information access. The VOA plays a vital role that should be protected.
This is an interesting legal battle over the future of the Voice of America. It will be important to see if the administration’s appeal is successful in overturning the judge’s order to fully restore the organization. This could have significant implications for global press freedom and information access.