Listen to the article
A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by New York City’s former interim police commissioner that accused former mayor Eric Adams and his top deputies of running the NYPD as a “criminal enterprise.”
The racketeering lawsuit was filed in July by Thomas Donlon, a veteran FBI official who was appointed by Adams to stabilize the police department amid ongoing scandals. In his complaint, Donlon claimed he discovered “systemic corruption and criminal conduct” throughout the department that was allegedly enabled by Adams and his allies.
Judge Denise Cote ruled Wednesday that the alleged misconduct did not meet the legal definition of racketeering activity, noting that the lawsuit failed to demonstrate that defendants acted with “a common purpose” – a necessary element for such claims to proceed.
A spokesperson for the city’s Law Department expressed satisfaction with the decision, stating they were “pleased the court agreed there was no legal basis for this case to continue.” Adams’ office did not respond to requests for comment on the ruling.
John Scola, the attorney representing Donlon, confirmed his client has already appealed the decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. “Mr. Donlon confronted corruption within the NYPD’s highest ranks and was forced out for refusing to engage in illegal conduct,” Scola said in a statement. “We are confident the Second Circuit will allow his claims to proceed.”
The lawsuit contained serious allegations against the Adams administration, including claims that NYPD leadership routinely inflated overtime costs, obstructed internal investigations, and retaliated against whistleblowers who attempted to report misconduct. These accusations emerged during a particularly turbulent period for both the police department and the Adams administration.
Donlon’s brief tenure as interim commissioner came at a critical juncture for the NYPD. He was appointed following the resignation of Edward Caban, whose phone was seized by federal authorities as part of a broader investigation into the Adams administration. Several high-ranking city officials have had their homes and offices searched by federal agents in recent months, signaling the scope of the ongoing probe.
After serving approximately two months in the interim role, Donlon was replaced by Jessica Tisch, who continues to lead the department. His lawsuit represents one of several legal actions filed by veteran police officials alleging widespread corruption and favoritism within the department under Adams’ leadership.
The legal challenges facing the NYPD come amid a wider federal investigation that has resulted in multiple bribery cases against former police officials who served during the Adams administration. These cases have raised questions about oversight and accountability within one of the nation’s largest police departments.
The allegations have also created political challenges for Adams, who campaigned heavily on his law enforcement background as a former NYPD captain and promised to improve public safety while addressing concerns about police conduct and accountability.
The dismissal of Donlon’s lawsuit does not end the legal scrutiny surrounding the department. As the appeal moves forward, and with federal investigations continuing, the NYPD faces ongoing questions about its internal operations and leadership culture.
Legal experts note that racketeering claims, which are typically associated with organized crime prosecutions, face a high bar in civil litigation against government entities. The judge’s ruling centered on technical legal requirements rather than evaluating the substance of the corruption allegations themselves.
The case highlights the complex relationship between city leadership and police administration in New York, where political considerations often intersect with law enforcement operations and policies.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


9 Comments
The judge’s ruling suggests the legal standards for racketeering claims are quite high, but that doesn’t mean the underlying issues around alleged misconduct should be ignored. Robust investigations are still warranted.
Interesting to see the court’s take on this corruption lawsuit against the NYPD leadership. While the legal bar for racketeering seems high, the allegations of systemic misconduct deserve serious investigation regardless.
Agreed, transparency and accountability are critical for any police force. The appeal process will be important to watch.
While the judge dismissed this lawsuit, the broader allegations of systemic corruption in the NYPD are deeply troubling. Thorough, impartial investigations are crucial to upholding public trust in law enforcement.
This case highlights the ongoing challenges of rooting out corruption in large, complex organizations like the NYPD. The judge’s ruling points to the difficulties in proving coordinated criminal activity, even with credible whistleblower claims.
You’re right, these types of lawsuits face a high legal bar. Proving systemic misconduct is extremely difficult, but the public deserves answers one way or the other.
Lawsuits like this shine a spotlight on the challenges of policing the police. The complexity of the legal system can make it hard to hold high-level officials accountable, even with credible whistleblower evidence.
While the judge dismissed this particular lawsuit, the broader issue of alleged corruption in the NYPD remains concerning. Rigorous internal and external oversight is needed to restore public trust.
This case highlights the need for strong, independent oversight mechanisms to root out corruption in large law enforcement agencies. The appeals process will be important to follow.