Listen to the article
Iran Intensifies Crackdown on Nationwide Protests with Communications Blackout
When protests erupt across Iran, the government’s first response has often been not dialogue but darkness.
Iranian authorities have imposed sweeping internet and communications blackouts, expanded surveillance drone usage, and deployed security forces to suppress demonstrators in recent days. Analysts and human rights groups say Tehran is refining a playbook designed to smother dissent before it can spread.
A nationwide internet blackout has now persisted for five days, with connectivity at near-zero levels, according to global internet monitor NetBlocks. Local authorities are also disrupting satellite internet services like Starlink to further limit Iranians’ ability to communicate.
The objective, analysts say, is speed.
“The Islamic Republic only has one answer for the protesters,” Jason Brodsky, a nonresident scholar at the Middle East Institute, told Fox News Digital. “The only way out of this mess that it has created for the Iranian people is by cracking down on them — more violence and more repression.”
Since the start of 2026, Iran has been rocked by anti-government protests driven by economic hardship, political repression, and anger at the country’s clerical leadership. Demonstrations have spread beyond major cities into smaller towns and rural areas. High inflation, unemployment, and frustration over social restrictions have fueled unrest across generational and regional lines, challenging the regime’s claim that opposition is confined to isolated urban pockets.
Brodsky noted that Iran’s leadership has learned from previous protest waves that allowing unrest to gain momentum — or visibility — can quickly spiral beyond its control. In 2019 and again in 2022, demonstrations expanded rapidly once images of violence spread online, drawing international scrutiny and pressure.
“This is a very well-worn playbook that the Islamic Republic employs,” Brodsky explained, describing a layered security response designed to contain protests early. Iranian police are typically deployed first, with more powerful forces such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Basij militia held in reserve.
Alongside communications blackouts and arrests, authorities are increasingly relying on surveillance technology to track protesters, including drones to monitor crowds and identify individuals.
“They’re trying to collect intelligence on who is involved,” Brodsky said, describing efforts to map protest networks and determine how demonstrations are being organized.
United Nations investigators have previously documented Iran’s expanding use of technology-enabled repression, including surveillance drones, facial recognition software, and digital tracking systems aimed at identifying dissidents. Rights groups say data collected during protests is often used later to carry out arrests, intimidation, and prosecutions.
The human cost of the current crackdown appears to be escalating rapidly. At least 3,000 people have reportedly been killed, according to Fox News reporting, with the actual figure likely higher. More than 10,000 people have been arrested.
By comparison, Iranian security forces killed more than 500 people during months-long protest crackdowns over 2022 and 2023, according to the U.S. State Department, and approximately 300 people during a 2019 protest wave, according to Amnesty International.
As the Trump administration weighs potential strike options against Iran, analysts note the U.S. still has a broad range of non-kinetic tools at its disposal. Information and cyber warfare may be the most effective options, particularly as Tehran relies on internet shutdowns, surveillance, and digital command-and-control systems to suppress dissent.
“The U.S. has a very robust offensive cyber capability,” Brodsky said. These capabilities were demonstrated during an operation to capture Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro earlier in January, when the U.S. launched a cyberattack that scrambled communications and power sources in Caracas.
Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, cautioned that U.S. action aimed at supporting protesters could backfire if poorly targeted or perceived as disconnected from the crackdown on the streets. He argued that actions directly aimed at the regime’s repression apparatus — including systems used to jam communications — are more likely to be effective.
“An intermediate option could be kinetic or cyber attacks against the infrastructure supporting the military jamming the regime is doing to Starlink,” Taleblu suggested.
Trump has said he would speak with Elon Musk about restoring internet access in Iran through Musk’s Starlink technology. While Starlink can bypass state-controlled infrastructure, it requires physical terminals on the ground — a major constraint in a country where such equipment is illegal and aggressively targeted by security forces.
Despite the intensifying crackdown, analysts say many Iranians appear more defiant than fearful.
“There is an increasing fearlessness among the Iranian people that has become much more palpable and tangible in every round of protests that we’ve seen in recent years. And it’s very difficult to get the genie back in the bottle for the regime once the fear factor has been eroded,” Brodsky concluded.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


10 Comments
The regime’s crackdown on protesters using force and cyber tactics is deeply troubling. While the economic hardships driving the unrest are understandable, the government’s violent suppression of dissent is unacceptable. I hope the international community applies pressure to respect human rights and open political dialogue.
Agreed, the regime’s response is extremely heavy-handed and counterproductive. Cutting off communications and resorting to violence will only further inflame the situation and erode the government’s legitimacy.
This news highlights the precarious situation for Iran’s energy sector amidst the protests. With electricity blackouts and disruptions to communications, I wonder what impacts this could have on the country’s energy infrastructure and exports. The regime’s priorities seem to be maintaining power rather than addressing systemic issues.
The details of Iran’s cyber tactics to disrupt communications and internet access are quite disturbing. It seems the regime is doubling down on a strategy of information control and repression rather than addressing the root economic and political grievances fueling the protests.
Cutting off internet and satellite services is a desperate attempt by the regime to maintain control. But this will only further inflame the situation and drive more public anger.
The regime’s reliance on force and information control to quell the protests is a worrying sign. Cutting off internet access and disrupting communications is a heavy-handed tactic that will likely backfire and further inflame public anger. A more constructive approach of addressing economic and political grievances through open dialogue would be a better path forward.
Exactly. The regime’s crackdown tactics are counterproductive and will only serve to deepen the crisis. A genuine commitment to reform and respecting human rights is needed to resolve this situation.
This is a concerning situation for Iran and the international community. The regime’s heavy-handed response of internet blackouts and violence against protesters is deeply troubling. One hopes this crisis can be resolved through open dialogue and respect for human rights.
Agreed, the regime’s actions to suppress dissent are reprehensible. Restricting communications and using force against civilians exercising their right to protest is unacceptable.
This news about Iran’s internet blackout and cyber tactics to suppress protests is quite alarming. It speaks to the regime’s fear of losing control in the face of widespread public discontent. One hopes cooler heads can prevail and that the government engages in meaningful reform and dialogue to address the root causes of the unrest.