Listen to the article
Iran and US Reaffirm Commitment to Diplomacy Despite Deep Divide on Nuclear Deal
Iran and the United States expressed continued commitment to diplomatic engagement during a tense United Nations Security Council meeting on Tuesday, though profound disagreements over nuclear negotiations remain unresolved.
The sixth round of negotiations between Washington and Tehran had been scheduled to take place shortly after Israel’s 12-day military operation against Iran in June, during which the United States joined Israel in targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Those talks were subsequently canceled, and by September, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had explicitly rejected any direct nuclear negotiations with the United States.
Despite these setbacks, Iran’s UN Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani told the Security Council that “Iran remains fully committed to principled diplomacy and genuine negotiations.” He placed responsibility on France, Britain, and the United States “to reverse course and take concrete, credible steps to restore trust and confidence.”
Iravani emphasized that Iran continues to support the core principles of the 2015 nuclear agreement, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which was designed to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons in exchange for sanctions relief.
The nuclear deal was significantly undermined in 2018 when then-President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the agreement, which had been painstakingly negotiated between Iran and the five permanent Security Council members plus Germany.
In a rare direct exchange between diplomats from the two countries, U.S. Mission counselor Morgan Ortagus, a Trump ally and former State Department spokesperson, stated that “the United States remains available for formal talks with Iran but only if Tehran is prepared for direct and meaningful dialogue.”
Looking directly at Iravani, Ortagus said that Trump had extended “the hand of diplomacy” to Iran during both of his administrations. “But instead of taking that hand of diplomacy, you continue to put your hand in the fire,” she said. “Step away from the fire, sir, and take President Trump’s hand of diplomacy. It’s extended to you.”
Ortagus, however, maintained the Trump administration’s firm position that there can be no uranium enrichment activities within Iran – a central point of disagreement between the two nations.
The Iranian ambassador countered that the U.S. insistence on zero enrichment contradicts Iran’s rights under the 2015 agreement and demonstrates that Washington is not pursuing fair negotiations. He warned that if France and Britain continued to align with the U.S. position, “diplomacy will be effectively destroyed.”
“Iran will not bow down to any pressure and intimidation,” Iravani declared.
The diplomatic impasse has deepened since September, when Britain, France, and Germany triggered the agreement’s “snapback” mechanism to reinstate sanctions that had previously been lifted, citing Iran’s failure to comply with the deal’s conditions.
As tensions have escalated, Iran has accelerated its production of highly enriched uranium. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN’s nuclear watchdog based in Vienna, has reported that Iran now possesses over 440 kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60 percent – just one technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 percent.
France’s deputy UN ambassador Jay Dharmadhikari defended the reimposition of UN sanctions, noting that since 2019 Iran has been in “increasingly flagrant violation” of limitations designed to ensure its nuclear program remains peaceful. He emphasized that the return of sanctions does not signal an end to diplomatic efforts to find a solution.
Russia’s UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia sharply criticized the Western position, telling the French envoy: “You failed miserably in your so-called diplomatic efforts to strike a deal on the nuclear issue with Iran, and you know it.”
The contentious Security Council meeting underscores the continuing challenges facing international efforts to address concerns about Iran’s nuclear program, with positions hardening on all sides and the prospects for a diplomatic breakthrough appearing increasingly remote.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
The stalled nuclear negotiations are concerning, but I’m cautiously optimistic that the US and Iran can find a way forward through diplomatic channels. Maintaining open lines of communication is key, even if the path to a deal remains uncertain.
It’s good to see both sides reaffirming their commitment to diplomacy at the UN, despite the significant gaps that remain. Narrowing those differences will require tenacity, creativity, and a willingness to compromise on all sides.
Agreed. With the high stakes involved, both Iran and the US will need to show flexibility and a pragmatic approach if they hope to reach a lasting diplomatic solution on the nuclear issue.
The lack of progress on the nuclear deal is disappointing, but I’m hopeful that the renewed diplomatic engagement at the UN is a sign that a path forward can be found. Bridging the divide will require nuanced negotiations and a shared commitment to compromise.
Diplomacy is critical for resolving the ongoing nuclear tensions between Iran and the US. While the gap remains wide, continued engagement and good-faith efforts from both sides are necessary to find a lasting solution.
Agreed. Reaching a diplomatic compromise will require significant compromise and concessions from all parties involved. The stakes are high, so a pragmatic approach is needed.
The US and Iran’s reaffirmation of commitment to diplomacy at the UN is a positive step, but tangible progress on the nuclear deal remains elusive. Resolving the remaining disagreements will require creative problem-solving and compromise from all sides.
Absolutely. With so much at stake geopolitically, it’s crucial that diplomats on both sides show flexibility and a willingness to make concessions to find a mutually acceptable solution.