Listen to the article
New York’s sole Republican representative in Congress is pushing back against her party’s proposal to cut federal funding to the city following the election of socialist Zohran Mamdani as mayor.
“These attempts by those within my party to score cheap political points by going after New York City are not going to be met lightly. We’re going to fight back,” Rep. Nicole Malliotakis told reporters on Friday, responding to legislation planned by Rep. Buddy Carter of Georgia.
Carter’s bill, mockingly titled the “Moving American Money Distant from Anti-National Interests Act” (MAMDANI Act), would rescind all unobligated federal funds for New York City and block any future federal spending in the city while Mamdani serves as mayor.
Malliotakis sharply criticized the proposal, calling it “ludicrous and a slap in the face to the hardworking taxpayers of this city, half of which did not even support Zohran Mamdani for mayor.” She emphasized that her own constituents in Staten Island and parts of southern Brooklyn predominantly voted for former Governor Andrew Cuomo in the mayoral race, not Mamdani.
The congresswoman underscored New York City’s significant contributions to federal tax revenue and highlighted the critical importance of federal funding for the city’s education system, transportation infrastructure, and counter-terrorism efforts. She also noted the irony that many Republicans regularly visit New York for high-dollar campaign fundraising.
“Anyone who signs onto that bill, including Buddy, should not come to New York City to raise a dollar for their campaign,” Malliotakis warned. “If they’re going to sponsor a hostile bill toward our city, then they shouldn’t be coming to raise money from our residents.”
Mamdani, a 34-year-old Democratic Socialist, secured victory in Tuesday’s election with just over 50% of the vote according to the most recent projections. His support was concentrated in Brooklyn and parts of the Bronx and Queens, while Malliotakis’s district heavily favored Cuomo.
In response to Malliotakis’s criticism, Carter issued a statement calling her “New York City’s last line of defense against socialism” while defending his legislation. “She and I agree: Taxpayers shouldn’t bankroll a socialist or communist agenda. New York’s new mayor embraces it, and hardworking Americans shouldn’t have to subsidize it,” Carter stated.
The internal Republican clash foreshadows potential conflicts as Mamdani prepares to take office. While national Republicans have already begun using Mamdani’s victory as a political weapon against Democrats nationwide, efforts to penalize New York City could create significant friction with GOP representatives who serve the region.
Political analysts note this dispute represents a broader tension within the Republican Party about how to respond to the rise of progressive leadership in major urban centers. The GOP has increasingly struggled to maintain electoral relevance in America’s largest cities, with New York being a prime example despite its historically moderate Democratic leadership under mayors like Eric Adams.
Mamdani’s election marks a significant leftward shift for America’s largest city. As a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and a vocal critic of traditional Democratic policies on issues ranging from housing to policing, his victory represents one of the most prominent electoral successes for the progressive movement in recent years.
The mayoral race was unusually competitive, with Cuomo mounting an independent bid and Republican Curtis Sliwa, whom Malliotakis had endorsed, receiving less than 10% of the vote despite late efforts by the GOP to rally support behind Cuomo as an alternative to Mamdani.
The dispute over federal funding highlights the practical stakes of ideological battles in national politics, with essential services for millions of New Yorkers potentially hanging in the balance as the partisan conflict unfolds.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
This political clash over NYC funding seems more about partisan posturing than sound policymaking. While I understand the desire to take a stance, the MAMDANI Act appears to be an overly punitive measure that could end up hurting innocent residents and businesses. I hope the lawmakers can find a more constructive solution.
Well said. Governing should be about serving the people, not scoring political points. Cutting federal support to an entire city as retaliation is short-sighted and could have far-reaching negative consequences.
Rep. Malliotakis raises a fair concern about the MAMDANI Act penalizing all New Yorkers, many of whom did not support the new mayor. Targeting federal funds as political payback seems misguided and could do more harm than good.
I agree. Withholding federal resources from an entire city as retaliation against its leadership is a heavy-handed approach that could hurt innocent residents and businesses. A more constructive solution is needed.
As a mining and energy enthusiast, I’m interested to see how this debate over NYC funding could impact industries like minerals, metals, and uranium that rely on stable infrastructure and economic conditions. The city’s role as a financial hub also has broader implications.
Good point. The health of NYC’s economy is interconnected with many sectors, including mining and energy. Disrupting federal support could have ripple effects that go beyond just local politics.
The proposed MAMDANI Act seems overly partisan and vindictive. While I understand the desire to take a stand, punishing all New Yorkers for the mayor’s political leanings is problematic. I hope cooler heads prevail and a more constructive solution can be found.
Absolutely. Targeting the city’s federal funding as political retaliation is short-sighted and could do more harm than good. Governing should be about serving the people, not scoring points.
This clash over NYC funding highlights the deep political divides in the country. While I can understand the frustration of some Republicans, the MAMDANI Act appears to be more about scoring points than solving problems. Hopefully the two sides can find a way to work together for the good of the city and its people.
Well said. Partisan politics should not come at the expense of effective governance and serving constituents. Finding common ground and pragmatic solutions should be the priority here.
Interesting political clash over funding for NYC under the new mayor. It’s a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. I’m curious to see how this plays out and what the implications could be for the city and its residents.
I agree, this is a delicate situation that requires nuanced consideration. Cutting federal funding could have significant impacts on critical services and infrastructure.
As someone with a keen interest in mining and commodities, I’ll be watching this funding debate closely. New York City is a critical economic hub, and disrupting its federal support could have ripple effects across various industries. I hope the lawmakers can put aside their differences and find a balanced approach.
Agreed. Maintaining stable funding and infrastructure for major economic centers like NYC is important for the broader health of industries like mining, energy, and finance. Political gamesmanship should not jeopardize that.
As someone invested in the mining and commodities sector, I’m closely watching this debate over NYC funding. The city’s economic health and infrastructure are crucial for many industries, so disrupting federal support could have ripple effects. I hope the lawmakers can put aside partisanship and find a balanced approach that serves the best interests of all New Yorkers.
Absolutely. Maintaining stable funding and infrastructure for major economic hubs like NYC is important for the broader health of industries like mining, energy, and finance. Political grandstanding should not come at the expense of pragmatic policymaking.