Listen to the article
The Republican-controlled House passed legislation Tuesday aimed at loosening federal water efficiency standards for showerheads, advancing a bill that supporters say gives consumers more freedom of choice while critics warn of increased utility costs and environmental impacts.
The Saving Homeowners from Overregulation With Exceptional Rinsing Act, dubbed the “Shower ACT,” passed by a vote of 226-197, with 11 Democrats joining Republicans in support of the measure.
Republican Representative Russell Fry, who sponsored the bill, framed the legislation as a matter of consumer choice. “If they want a nozzle that dribbles on their head, well then go get one of those. If you want something that slices an orange, well then go get one of those. That should be your choice as a consumer,” Fry said during floor debate.
The legislation builds upon an executive order signed by former President Donald Trump in April, which called for eliminating water conservation standards that limit water flow through household appliances including showerheads, dishwashers, washing machines, and toilets. House Speaker Mike Johnson has positioned the bill as part of a broader effort to codify Trump’s executive actions into federal law.
For more than three decades, federal energy regulations have specified that new showerheads should not exceed a flow rate of 2.5 gallons of water per minute. The Obama administration tightened these restrictions by applying the limit to the entire showerhead unit, even those with multiple nozzles.
During his first term, Trump relaxed these rules to allow each individual nozzle within a showerhead to flow at up to 2.5 gallons per minute, effectively permitting multi-nozzle fixtures to use substantially more water. The Biden administration reversed this change in 2021, reinstating the stricter standard.
The current legislation is part of Trump’s long-running campaign against water efficiency standards. During his presidency and subsequent campaign events, Trump frequently complained about weak water pressure in showers, dishwashers, and toilets, famously declaring his intention to “make showers great again.”
Republican Representative Michael Rulli of Ohio defended the bill as supporting working-class Americans. “You go on vacation, you go to a motel and you get a shower, it’s the worst shower you ever had. It’s cold. It’s dripping out there. The working man cannot even enjoy his daily life,” Rulli argued.
Democrats and environmental groups have strongly criticized the proposal, warning it would increase water consumption, raise energy costs associated with heating water, and potentially exacerbate drought conditions in water-stressed regions.
Representative Melanie Stansbury, a Democrat from New Mexico, questioned the priorities of House Republicans. “Why on God’s green earth, on the first full day that this Congress is back in 2026, are the Republicans using the floor time — in the midst of armed conflict and daily corruption by this administration — to run a bill on rich people showers?” Stansbury asked during last week’s debate.
Water conservation experts note that modern plumbing technology has already improved shower experiences while maintaining efficiency standards. Many manufacturers have developed fixtures that create the sensation of higher water pressure through aeration and innovative spray patterns while still meeting federal flow limits.
The legislation’s prospects in the Democratic-controlled Senate remain uncertain, particularly as lawmakers focus on more pressing issues such as government funding and foreign policy challenges. Policy analysts suggest the bill may be more symbolic than substantive at this point, serving as a political statement rather than a measure likely to become law in the current Congress.
If enacted, the legislation could have varying impacts across different regions of the country, with potential water conservation concerns most acute in drought-prone Western states where water resources are already under significant strain.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
6 Comments
The debate over showerhead regulations highlights the ongoing tension between personal freedom and environmental responsibility. It will be interesting to see how this plays out and whether a compromise can be reached that satisfies both consumer choice and sustainability concerns.
Interesting to see this debate continue over showerhead regulations. I’m curious to hear more perspectives on the potential tradeoffs involved – how would this impact water usage, utility bills, and the environment? There may be room for nuance here beyond just ‘more choice’ or ‘more regulation’.
As someone who cares about the environment, I have mixed feelings about this bill. While consumer choice is important, I’m concerned about the potential for increased water usage and utility costs. Is there a middle ground that preserves some flexibility for consumers while still promoting water conservation?
This seems like a complicated issue without a clear-cut solution. I can understand the desire for consumer freedom, but also the need to consider environmental impact and utility costs. Hopefully lawmakers can find a balanced approach that addresses all the relevant considerations.
This bill seems like a step backwards for water conservation efforts. While consumer choice is important, we should also consider the environmental impact and utility costs of less efficient showerheads. A balanced approach that gives people options while still promoting sustainability would be ideal.
I agree, it’s a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. A compromise solution could strike a better balance between consumer freedom and environmental responsibility.