Listen to the article
Senate and White House Reach Deal on Government Funding as Conservatives Express Skepticism
Senate Democrats and the White House announced Thursday they have reached an agreement to fund the federal government, sidelining the contentious Department of Homeland Security funding bill that threatened to trigger a partial government shutdown. The compromise, however, faces skepticism from House Republicans who must approve any deal before the January 30 deadline.
The agreement, negotiated between President Donald Trump and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer after intense discussions that stretched from late Wednesday into Thursday evening, would separate the DHS funding bill from a broader six-bill package. Instead, DHS would receive a short-term funding extension of two weeks through a continuing resolution while lawmakers negotiate restrictions on Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
“The separation of the five bipartisan bills the Democrats asked for, plus the two-week DHS continuing resolution has been agreed to,” Schumer said in a statement.
President Trump urged Republicans to support the deal on his Truth Social platform. “Hopefully, both Republicans and Democrats will give a very much-needed bipartisan ‘YES’ Vote,” Trump wrote, adding that “the only thing that can slow our Country down is another long and damaging Government Shutdown.”
However, the deal faces significant resistance from House conservatives who view the compromise as capitulation to Democratic demands. Rep. Mark Harris, R-N.C., told Fox News Digital that “Schumer’s current demands, compounded by a lack of conservative priorities, are an absolute non-starter” in the House.
“With Chuck Schumer’s demands to handcuff ICE and his Democrat colleagues threatening to shut down the government over it, this is yet another example of the radical left prioritizing criminals over American citizens,” Harris added.
Other House Republicans expressed concern about the short-term nature of the DHS funding extension. One anonymous House conservative remarked, “We’re still looking at what is being discussed in the deal, but 14 days is awfully short. We sure think we should be getting something out of this deal when it’s Democrats who are threatening a shutdown, not Republicans.”
The House Freedom Caucus has been particularly vocal in its opposition. Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., a caucus member, told Fox News Digital: “THE HOUSE DID OUR JOB BY PASSING THE REMAINING SIX APPROPRIATION BILLS TO THE SENATE AND THERE IS NO RATIONAL REASON TO REMOVE DHS FROM THE APPROVAL PROCESS.” Norman accused Democrats of trying to “demonize” and “bludgeon” DHS, adding, “IF THE DEMOCRATS WANT TO SHUT THE GOVERNMENT DOWN, ‘DO IT’!!”
Not all House Republicans oppose the compromise. Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., wrote on social media: “I stand with @POTUS, a shutdown will only hurt the American people. I will vote YES on this package should it make it through the Senate!”
Even if the Senate passes the deal, the House’s schedule presents a logistical challenge. Lawmakers are not expected to return to Washington until February 2, three days after the January 30 funding deadline, making a brief partial government shutdown almost inevitable.
Mark Bednar, a GOP strategist and former spokesperson for then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy, defended the compromise: “President Trump wants to ensure that our troops, air traffic controllers and DHS patriots are on the job and get paid, and this path will help ensure they do that. It’s now on Democrats to negotiate in good faith with President Trump so that the homeland is secured with a long-term funding bill — because that’s what the American people want and deserve.”
The disagreement over DHS funding comes amid heightened tensions over immigration policy, with Republicans advocating for stronger border security measures and Democrats seeking to place restrictions on ICE’s detention capabilities. This standoff exemplifies the ongoing partisan divide over immigration enforcement that has characterized much of the current political landscape.
As the deadline approaches, all eyes will be on the Senate vote and subsequent House consideration, with the fate of federal government operations hanging in the balance.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
The debate over DHS funding is a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. I’m curious to see how this plays out and whether the two parties can find a mutually acceptable compromise.
This ongoing dispute over DHS funding highlights the deep ideological divides in Congress. While I understand the conservative position, I hope the lawmakers can find a pragmatic solution that prioritizes national security.
Compromise is essential in a divided government. Both sides need to be willing to make concessions for the greater good of the country.
The ongoing debate over DHS funding highlights the partisan divide in Congress. It will be crucial for both sides to find common ground and avoid a potential government shutdown.
Negotiations on sensitive issues like immigration and border security often get bogged down in partisan politics. Hopefully the lawmakers can move past the rhetoric and find a pragmatic solution.
The Senate’s compromise deal to separate DHS funding from the broader package seems like a reasonable approach, though the House conservatives’ opposition is concerning. Resolving this impasse will require compromise from both parties.
Interesting that the House conservatives are rejecting the Senate deal on DHS funding. It seems like a contentious issue that is still far from resolved.
The funding for Homeland Security is always a sensitive topic. I wonder what the key sticking points are that are preventing a compromise.
It’s disappointing to see the House conservatives reject the Senate’s bipartisan deal. Funding for critical agencies like DHS should not be held hostage to partisan politics.
At the end of the day, the American people need their government to function effectively. I hope the lawmakers can set aside their differences and find a solution that works for everyone.