Listen to the article
Judge to Decide Fate of Kilmar Abrego Garcia After Brief Release from Immigration Custody
A federal judge will hear arguments Monday on whether Kilmar Abrego Garcia should return to immigration detention after being free for just over a week, in a case that has become a flashpoint in the national immigration debate.
Abrego Garcia, whose mistaken deportation to El Salvador drew attention from both sides of the political spectrum, had been in immigration custody since August. During his detention, government officials repeatedly changed their plans regarding his deportation destination, while making no effort to send him to Costa Rica—the only country he has agreed to go to.
U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, who ordered Abrego Garcia’s release on December 11, accused government officials of misleading the court by falsely claiming Costa Rica was unwilling to accept him. Her ruling also determined that the immigration judge who heard his case in 2019 failed to issue a proper removal order, which is legally required for deportation.
Government attorneys contend that even without a final removal order, they can legally detain Abrego Garcia while working to deport him. In response, his legal team has cited a Supreme Court ruling establishing that because immigration proceedings are civil rather than criminal, detention must be “nonpunitive.” They argue that holding him indefinitely without a viable deportation plan constitutes punishment.
Republican Party Faces Internal Divisions at Turning Point Convention
The annual Turning Point USA convention has exposed growing rifts within the Republican Party as top figures in the MAGA movement vie for influence in a post-Trump era.
Vice President JD Vance, speaking at the gathering Sunday, said the conservative movement should welcome anyone who “loves America,” but notably declined to condemn antisemitic rhetoric that has divided Republicans and overshadowed the event. Vance has received the endorsement of Turning Point leader Erika Kirk, who assumed leadership after the assassination of her husband Charlie Kirk, as a potential successor to President Donald Trump.
The tension on display at the four-day gathering highlights the challenges facing potential Republican presidential candidates. Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro used his speech to denounce “charlatans who claim to speak in the name of principle but actually traffic in conspiracism and dishonesty,” directly criticizing Tucker Carlson. Taking the stage shortly afterward, Carlson dismissed the notion of a Republican “civil war” as “totally fake.”
The Republican Party’s identity has been intertwined with Trump for a decade, but he is constitutionally ineligible to run for reelection, despite occasional suggestions about serving a third term. The conference featured heated debates on antisemitism, Israel, environmental regulations, and personal rivalries between influential conservative figures.
U.S. Coast Guard Pursues Another Oil Tanker Off Venezuela’s Coast
The U.S. Coast Guard is pursuing another sanctioned oil tanker in the Caribbean Sea, signaling an intensification of the Trump administration’s targeting of vessels connected to the Venezuelan government.
A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly on the ongoing operation, confirmed Sunday that the pursuit involved “a sanctioned dark fleet vessel that is part of Venezuela’s illegal sanctions evasion.” The vessel is reportedly flying a false flag and under a judicial seizure order.
This pursuit comes just one day after the U.S. announced it had seized another tanker—the second such seizure in less than two weeks. These operations coincide with Trump’s directive to the Defense Department to conduct a series of attacks on vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean allegedly smuggling fentanyl and other illegal drugs into the United States. At least 104 people have been killed in 28 known strikes since early September.
The growing number of maritime interdictions reflects the administration’s increasingly aggressive posture toward Venezuela and alleged drug trafficking operations in the region during its final weeks in office.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
The judge’s previous ruling that the immigration judge failed to issue a proper removal order is an interesting legal point. It will be important for the court to carefully consider the government’s arguments about their authority to detain Abrego Garcia even without a final order.
Absolutely, the legal nuances around removal orders and detention authority will be crucial in determining the outcome here. This case highlights the complexities in immigration proceedings that can have major consequences for individuals.
This situation with Abrego Garcia highlights the challenges and inconsistencies that can arise in immigration enforcement. The government’s changing plans and apparent legal missteps raise serious concerns about transparency and due process.
The judge’s accusation that government officials misled the court is a very serious allegation. Maintaining the integrity of the judicial process is crucial, so I’ll be interested to see how this aspect of the case plays out.
Absolutely, allegations of misleading the court are very concerning. Ensuring honesty and accuracy in legal proceedings is essential, so the judge will need to carefully examine the evidence and rationale on both sides.
This case highlights the complexities and challenges in immigration enforcement, where the government’s actions don’t always align with the legal requirements. I hope the judge can provide clarity and ensure a fair outcome for all involved.
It’s good to see that this case has drawn attention from both sides of the political spectrum. Immigration issues can be divisive, but upholding the rule of law and due process should be a non-partisan concern. I hope the judge makes a fair and impartial decision.
I agree, this case transcends partisan politics and really gets to the heart of fundamental legal principles. Whichever way the judge rules, it will be important for all sides to respect the decision and focus on improving the immigration system going forward.
This is a complex case with important implications for immigration law and due process. I’m curious to see how the judge rules on whether Abrego Garcia should be returned to detention. The government’s shifting plans and apparent lack of a proper removal order raise some concerning questions.
You’re right, the government’s actions in this case do seem quite troubling. Proper procedures and transparency are crucial, especially when it comes to decisions that significantly impact people’s lives.