Listen to the article
New York Governor Kathy Hochul faced sharp criticism over the weekend for her response to an offer of federal assistance during a major winter storm that blanketed the state with up to 22 inches of snow in some areas.
The controversy began when Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem offered storm assistance to New York. Rather than simply accepting the aid, Hochul responded by saying, “I shared that the fastest way to help is for ICE to back off so people feel safe accessing warming centers, shelters, hospitals, and houses of worship.”
The blizzard hit New York hard, with West Shokan in Ulster County receiving 22 inches of snow. Other significant accumulations were reported in New City (17.5 inches), Golden’s Bridge in Westchester County (16.5 inches), Huguenot on Staten Island (14 inches), and Levittown on Long Island (13 inches), according to National Weather Service data.
Hochul’s response to the federal assistance offer sparked immediate backlash from various New York officials and organizations. The Staten Island Young Republicans blasted Hochul as the “worst governor in history” in a statement posted on social media.
Bruce Blakeman, the Republican Nassau County Executive who is challenging Hochul in the upcoming election, issued a statement saying the governor “actually rejected federal assistance that was offered to help keep people safe,” adding that “when lives are at risk, you don’t turn down help.”
The criticism intensified as reports emerged that three New Yorkers had died from the sub-freezing temperatures during the storm. Conservative strategist Steve Guest circulated these reports while accusing Hochul of “prioritizing politics over her constituents.”
White House spokesman Kush Desai also rebuked the governor, stating, “What a surprise — while President Trump and his entire Administration have taken steps to ensure all Americans have the resources they need to recover from this historic winter storm, Democrats instead are, once again, prioritizing the well-being of criminal illegal aliens.”
However, a source familiar with the situation defended Hochul, claiming that she never actually rejected federal assistance and that all storm-related requests from local governments were supported by Albany. This suggests a disconnect between the public perception of Hochul’s response and what may have occurred behind the scenes in terms of disaster management.
The incident highlights the increasingly tense relationship between federal immigration enforcement and state-level policies in New York. Hochul later escalated the situation by calling for U.S. Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino to be fired and for Secretary Noem to resign, claiming Noem had “forfeited her right to lead” and suggesting Bovino was acting as if he were “above the law.”
In subsequent statements, Hochul criticized the Trump administration’s approach to immigration enforcement, saying that the dispatch of Border Czar Tom Homan to Minnesota wouldn’t undo what she characterized as “harm” done by the administration.
Attempting to shift focus back to the storm response, Hochul later shared practical snow removal advice in a social media video, noting that as a “governor from Buffalo,” she was well-acquainted with handling significant snowfall. Buffalo, located in western New York, is famously known for its severe winter weather, often visible during televised Buffalo Bills football games.
The controversy underscores the complex intersection of disaster response, immigration policy, and partisan politics in New York State, with local officials continuing to debate whether Hochul’s focus on immigration concerns during a weather emergency was appropriate given the immediate needs of residents facing dangerous winter conditions.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
It’s a complex situation with valid concerns on both sides. The priority should be ensuring all residents, regardless of immigration status, can safely access emergency services during a crisis like this blizzard.
This seems like a missed opportunity for the state and federal government to coordinate an effective disaster response. Hopefully they can put aside political differences and focus on supporting New Yorkers impacted by the storm.
Curious to see how this plays out. The governor’s stance seems to put her at odds with the federal government’s offer of assistance. Hopefully they can find a way to work together to help residents affected by the blizzard.
This highlights the ongoing tensions around immigration enforcement and disaster response. While the governor’s intent may have been to protect vulnerable communities, her comments came across as confrontational rather than collaborative.
You make a good point. Disaster response should focus on providing aid efficiently, not get mired in political debates. Effective coordination between all levels of government is critical.
The backlash from local officials highlights the political divides around these issues. While the governor may have been trying to protect undocumented immigrants, her comments risk undermining the overall disaster response effort.
The governor’s comments raise important questions about balancing public safety, civil liberties, and emergency management. It will be interesting to see how this issue plays out in the media and political landscape.
Interesting situation with Governor Hochul’s response to the federal aid offer. It’s understandable she wants to ensure undocumented residents feel safe accessing essential services, but her wording seemed to politicize the storm response unnecessarily.
I agree, it was a sensitive situation that could have been handled more diplomatically. Balancing public safety with political concerns is always tricky during emergencies.