Listen to the article
A House Republican is launching new legislation aimed at providing financial support for pregnant women before they give birth, addressing a significant gap in the current child support system.
Rep. Ashley Hinson of Iowa is introducing the Supporting Healthy Pregnancy Act, which would require biological fathers to cover at least 50% of out-of-pocket medical expenses related to pregnancy and delivery, including health insurance premiums. The bill represents an effort to expand financial support systems for expectant mothers who currently must wait until after birth to seek child support in most states.
Under the proposed legislation, mothers would need to request these payments before fathers become legally obligated to provide them. The bill includes certain limitations on costs and specifically excludes abortion-related expenses from coverage.
“I’m a mom on a mission to make life easier for my fellow moms and families,” said Hinson, who is currently running for Senate in Iowa. “Strong families make a strong nation, and we should work together to support the parents and women who are building America’s future.”
The legislation comes amid ongoing political tensions over reproductive rights and family support policies. Republicans have faced criticism from Democrats who argue the GOP opposes abortion rights while failing to adequately support women who choose to continue their pregnancies.
Hinson’s bill represents part of a broader legislative package focused on maternal support. Another bill she has introduced would require higher education institutions to inform pregnant students about available rights and resources on campus, aiming to provide alternatives to abortion by expanding support systems.
The Iowa representative is also co-leading a bipartisan effort with Democratic Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet of Michigan to increase access to midwifery care and training, particularly in underserved areas. This initiative addresses the growing concern about maternal healthcare deserts in rural and economically disadvantaged communities across the United States.
Maternal health experts have long pointed to significant gaps in prenatal and postpartum care in America. According to the March of Dimes, more than 2.2 million women of childbearing age live in counties with limited or no access to maternity care services. This shortage disproportionately affects rural communities and contributes to poor maternal health outcomes.
The financial burden of pregnancy can be substantial. A 2023 study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that average out-of-pocket costs for maternal care can range from $1,000 to over $2,500 for women with private insurance. For uninsured women, these costs can be dramatically higher.
The proposed legislation also addresses a longstanding inequity in child support systems. While fathers are legally obligated to provide financial support after birth, many pregnant women bear the full financial responsibility during pregnancy—a period when they may face reduced work hours, medical complications, and additional expenses.
Child support enforcement varies significantly across states, with collection rates hovering around 65% nationally, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Hinson’s bill would potentially strengthen these systems by establishing clearer guidelines for prenatal support.
The package of bills reflects an evolving approach within the Republican Party to family policy. Following the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, some GOP lawmakers have increasingly focused on expanding support for mothers and families as part of their pro-life platform.
As the legislative proposal moves forward, it will likely face scrutiny regarding implementation challenges, including how states would enforce these prenatal support requirements and how paternity would be established before birth in disputed cases.
While the legislative path forward remains unclear in a divided Congress, Hinson’s proposals highlight the ongoing national conversation about maternal support, parental responsibility, and the economic challenges facing American families.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
It’s encouraging to see lawmakers trying to address gaps in the current child support system. However, the practicalities of implementing a policy like this will likely be complex.
I’m curious to see how this bill would be implemented in practice. Requiring fathers to cover pregnancy costs could help, but there may be challenges around enforcement and eligibility criteria.
That’s a good point. Ensuring fair and equitable application would be crucial for this kind of policy to be effective.
While the intent behind this legislation is positive, there may be challenges around enforcement and potential unintended consequences that need to be carefully considered.
This is a complex issue and I’m curious to see how this bill would play out in practice. Providing more support for pregnant women is important, but the details will be key.
Interesting proposal to provide more financial support for pregnant women. It’s a complex issue, but any efforts to ease the burden on expectant mothers are worth considering.
This legislation seems like a step in the right direction, though the details will be important. Providing more support for women and families during pregnancy is important.
While the intent behind this bill is admirable, there could be unintended consequences that need to be carefully considered. Balancing the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved will be critical.
This proposal raises interesting questions about the role of government in supporting families and pregnancy-related costs. There are valid arguments on both sides that warrant further discussion.
Interesting proposal, though the practicalities of implementing a policy like this will likely be complex. Balancing the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved will be critical.
This legislation raises some interesting questions about the role of government in supporting families and pregnancy-related costs. There are valid arguments on both sides that warrant further discussion.
Expanding financial assistance for expectant mothers is a worthy goal, but the details of this bill will be crucial. Ensuring it’s fair and effective for all parties involved will be a challenge.