Listen to the article
Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein, invoked her Fifth Amendment rights almost immediately after her virtual appearance before the House Oversight Committee on Monday. The highly anticipated deposition, part of Congress’ bipartisan investigation into the federal government’s handling of Epstein’s sex trafficking case, concluded less than an hour after it began.
Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence in a Texas prison, appeared remotely for the closed-door interview. Her decision to plead the Fifth was widely anticipated by committee members, including Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who had publicly predicted this outcome in advance of the deposition.
The former British socialite was convicted in December 2021 for her role in Epstein’s scheme to sexually traffic and exploit underage girls. The Department of Justice stated during her sentencing that Maxwell had “enticed and groomed minor girls to be abused in multiple ways.”
Chairman Comer first announced plans to depose Maxwell in late January during a committee meeting focused on contempt proceedings against former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Both Clintons had initially refused to appear for depositions related to the Epstein investigation.
“We’ve been trying to get her in for a deposition. Our lawyers have been saying that she’s going to plead the Fifth, but we have nailed down a date, Feb. 9, where Ghislaine Maxwell will be deposed by this committee,” Comer stated at that time.
The committee’s efforts to secure Maxwell’s testimony weren’t straightforward. Comer’s team had engaged in extended negotiations with Maxwell’s legal representatives for months. The chairman had previously agreed to postpone an earlier scheduled deposition in August at her lawyer’s request, pending a Supreme Court decision on whether it would hear her appeal. The Supreme Court ultimately declined to take up Maxwell’s case in October, clearing the way for Monday’s appearance.
Maxwell’s brief testimony comes amid shifting dynamics in the committee’s broader investigation. The contempt proceedings against Bill and Hillary Clinton were recently suspended after the couple, through their attorneys, agreed to appear in person on Capitol Hill. This agreement came just days before the full House of Representatives was expected to vote on referring the pair to the Department of Justice for criminal charges for their previous refusal to comply with committee subpoenas.
The Epstein investigation has remained a contentious political issue, with lawmakers from both parties seeking answers about how the wealthy financier was able to operate his trafficking network for years with minimal legal consequences. Epstein died in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. His death was ruled a suicide, though questions and conspiracy theories have persisted.
Maxwell’s conviction represented one of the few instances of accountability in the sprawling Epstein case. Prosecutors successfully demonstrated her critical role in facilitating Epstein’s abuse of numerous underage girls over many years, often using her status and connections to recruit vulnerable victims.
The House Oversight Committee’s investigation continues as part of a broader effort to understand potential failures within federal law enforcement and the justice system that may have enabled Epstein’s criminal enterprise to operate for so long. The committee is expected to hear testimony from the Clintons in the coming weeks, though the precise timing and format of those appearances have not been publicly confirmed.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
5 Comments
The Epstein saga has raised many troubling questions about powerful individuals and their potential involvement in sex trafficking. Even with Maxwell’s conviction, there are still gaps that Congress is trying to fill through this investigation.
Maxwell’s decision to invoke the Fifth Amendment is hardly surprising given her criminal conviction and 20-year prison sentence. Oversight committees will likely continue to face challenges accessing testimony from key Epstein associates.
This is a complex and sensitive investigation, with many powerful individuals potentially implicated. Maxwell’s silence, while legally justified, does little to advance transparency and accountability.
This Epstein investigation is complex and politically charged. While Maxwell’s silence is understandable, it’s frustrating for those seeking accountability and transparency around the federal government’s handling of this case.
It’s disappointing but not surprising that Maxwell invoked her Fifth Amendment rights. Obtaining meaningful testimony from Epstein’s inner circle remains an uphill battle for Congressional investigators.