Listen to the article
Immigration Politics Set to Dominate Super Bowl Sunday
As the Seattle Seahawks prepare to face the New England Patriots in this year’s Super Bowl, the NFL finds itself caught in a political crossfire over immigration enforcement that threatens to overshadow the championship game.
More than 184,000 people have signed a petition calling on the league to denounce the potential presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at Levi’s Stadium in the San Francisco Bay Area. Progressive group MoveOn plans to deliver the petition to NFL headquarters in New York on Tuesday.
“This year’s Super Bowl should be remembered for big plays and Bad Bunny, not masked and armed ICE agents running around the stadium inflicting chaos, violence, and trauma on fans and stadium workers,” said MoveOn spokesperson Britt Jacovich. The organization is urging the NFL to “keep ICE out of the game.”
The controversy intensified following Grammy-winning artist Bad Bunny’s selection as the halftime show performer. The 31-year-old Puerto Rican superstar, born Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, has been an outspoken critic of former President Donald Trump, particularly regarding immigration policies and disaster response in Puerto Rico.
At Sunday’s Grammy Awards, Bad Bunny blasted ICE while accepting an award, further fueling tensions. His latest tour notably skipped the continental United States due to concerns that his fans might be targeted by immigration agents.
Trump, who attended last year’s Super Bowl but has declined this year’s invitation, called Bad Bunny “a terrible choice” for the halftime show. Meanwhile, Republican Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama derided the event as “the Woke Bowl,” announcing he would instead watch an alternative event hosted by conservative group Turning Point USA, which will feature Trump supporter Kid Rock.
The Department of Homeland Security has sent mixed signals about ICE’s role at the event. DHS official Jeff Brannigan reportedly indicated in private calls that ICE does not plan enforcement actions during Super Bowl week. However, DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin refused to confirm whether immigration agents would be present, stating only: “Those who are here legally and not breaking other laws have nothing to fear.”
This political tension comes just two weeks after Alex Pretti’s killing by federal agents in Minneapolis reignited national debate over the Trump administration’s law enforcement tactics, creating what NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell called a “tinderbox moment” for the country.
“The Super Bowl is supposed to be an escape, right? We’re supposed to go there to not have to talk about the serious things of this country,” said former New York Giants player Tiki Barber, who played in the 2001 Super Bowl. “I hope it doesn’t devolve, because if it does, then I think we’re really losing touch with what’s important in our society.”
Despite the controversy, Goodell expressed confidence in Bad Bunny’s performance, describing him as “one of the great artists in the world” who understands the power of the Super Bowl “to unite people and to be able to bring people together.”
Public opinion on Bad Bunny’s selection reflects America’s political divide. An October Quinnipiac University poll showed about half of Americans approved of him as the halftime performer, with substantial gaps along partisan and racial lines. Approximately three-quarters of Democrats backed the choice compared to just 16% of Republicans, while about 60% of Black and Hispanic adults approved versus 41% of whites.
The NFL, which is working to expand its global appeal, particularly in Latin America, confirmed it never considered removing Bad Bunny despite criticism. The halftime show represents a collaboration between the NFL, Roc Nation, and Apple Music, with the NFL maintaining ultimate control of the stage, broadcast, and branding.
San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie remained optimistic about the event despite the tensions. “We are going to keep everybody safe — our residents, our visitors,” he said. “Obviously with everything going on, we’re staying on top of it, monitoring everything. But I expect everything to be safe and fun.”
As Sunday approaches, what was once viewed as America’s premier sporting event now stands as a reflection of the nation’s deep political divisions, with the potential to become an unprecedented mix of sports, entertainment, politics, and protest.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
Puerto Rican artist Bad Bunny as the halftime performer is an interesting choice. His outspoken political views could add an extra layer of controversy to the proceedings. It will be intriguing to see how he approaches the performance.
As a major cultural event, the Super Bowl has always been a platform for social and political commentary. This year looks set to continue that tradition, with the added layer of immigration policy.
Agreed. It will be interesting to see how the league and the performers navigate these sensitive issues while still delivering an entertaining show for the fans.
The potential presence of ICE agents is a concerning development that could ruin the festive atmosphere. The league should take a strong stand against anything that could disrupt the event or make fans feel unsafe.
With the US so politically polarized, it’s inevitable that the Super Bowl will get caught up in those tensions. The league will need to tread carefully to avoid alienating fans on either side of the divide.
Absolutely. The NFL has to find a way to keep the focus on the game and entertainment while acknowledging the broader social and political context. It’s a delicate balancing act.
The presence of ICE agents at the Super Bowl is a concerning development. While security is important, it shouldn’t come at the expense of fan safety and comfort. The NFL needs to carefully balance these competing priorities.
Agreed. The league should take a firm stance against ICE involvement to avoid disrupting the game and alienating fans. Keeping the event focused on the sport and entertainment is key.
The Super Bowl has always been a platform for social and political statements, from the Black Panther salute in 1968 to Colin Kaepernick’s kneeling protests. This year looks set to continue that tradition in a divisive climate.
Interesting to see the political tensions surrounding this year’s Super Bowl. As a major sporting event, it’s inevitable that it will be impacted by broader social and political issues. I wonder how the NFL will navigate this tricky situation.