Listen to the article
Florida Democrats Decry Attorney General’s Opinion Against Minority Contract Laws
Florida’s Democratic lawmakers voiced strong opposition Thursday to a controversial opinion issued by Republican Attorney General James Uthmeier that questions the constitutionality of numerous state laws supporting minority businesses and diversity initiatives.
Uthmeier released his opinion on Monday—notably during the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday—claiming that approximately 80 Florida laws and programs violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because “they mandate discrimination based on race.” These programs include initiatives providing loans to Black businesses and set-aside contracts for minority enterprises.
The attorney general stated he would no longer enforce or defend what he termed “discriminatory” provisions in these laws, a move that has sparked immediate backlash from the Florida Legislative Black Caucus.
At a Thursday news conference, caucus members condemned the opinion as a political maneuver that could dismantle decades of bipartisan policies while dismissing Florida’s documented history of racial discrimination. They emphasized that until the 1960s, Florida operated under Jim Crow segregation laws that systematically discriminated against Black residents in schools, businesses, and public accommodations.
“I know he doesn’t understand this, and I know he doesn’t have our lived experience, but I wish he would listen when we explain the reality of our lives and what people go through in our communities,” said state Representative Fentrice Driskell, who serves as the Democratic leader in Florida’s Republican-controlled House. “Civil rights laws are protections against discrimination, not preferences. This is about leveling the playing field, making sure that Floridians who look like us, and Floridians who look like the attorney general, have the same opportunities.”
Uthmeier, who is white, was appointed to his position in 2023 by Republican Governor Ron DeSantis after the governor named then-Attorney General Ashley Moody to fill Marco Rubio’s vacant U.S. Senate seat when Rubio became Secretary of State in the Trump administration. Before his appointment, Uthmeier served as DeSantis’s chief of staff. He is currently running for election to maintain his position.
The timing and substance of the opinion have raised questions about political motivations, particularly as Uthmeier faces an upcoming election. Critics point out that the attorney general’s stance directly contradicts decades of established legal precedent and bipartisan policy initiatives designed to address historical inequities in government contracting and business opportunities.
State Senator Mack Bernard took the criticism a step further, suggesting that if Uthmeier refuses to enforce existing laws, Governor DeSantis should remove him from office—referencing previous instances where the governor has removed elected officials he claimed were not carrying out state laws properly.
“Democracy doesn’t survive by exclusion. It thrives when the institutions that govern us reflect the people they serve,” Bernard stated. “This is not reform. It is a deliberate dismantling of the best practices and pursuit of political power, and it should alarm every Floridian, regardless of party affiliation.”
The opinion potentially affects a wide range of programs established to address systemic barriers faced by minority business owners in securing government contracts, accessing capital, and participating equally in economic opportunities. Business leaders and civil rights advocates across the state have expressed concern that rolling back these programs could reverse decades of progress toward creating a more equitable business environment.
This controversy emerges amid a broader national debate about affirmative action and race-conscious policies following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision striking down race-conscious admissions policies at colleges and universities, though that ruling did not directly address government contracting or business support programs.
For now, the practical implications of Uthmeier’s opinion remain unclear, but Democratic lawmakers vow to challenge any attempt to dismantle programs they see as essential to addressing ongoing economic disparities in the state.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
This opinion seems highly controversial and politically charged. While equality is important, we must also account for Florida’s history of racial discrimination and the ongoing need for targeted support to address systemic inequities.
Dismissing decades of bipartisan policies supporting minority businesses and diversity initiatives could have significant negative impacts on economic opportunity and progress.
While the attorney general’s opinion cites the equal protection clause, it’s important to consider the nuanced reality of systemic barriers that these initiatives aim to address. Dismantling them could have unintended consequences.
This seems like a complex issue without easy answers. I’ll be following the developments with interest to better understand the various perspectives and potential impacts.
The timing of this opinion during the MLK holiday is highly questionable and raises concerns about potential political motivations. Upholding principles of equality and non-discrimination is important, but the historical context must also be considered.
I hope this issue can be carefully examined and debated in a constructive manner, focusing on the best ways to address racial inequities and promote true equal opportunity.
This is a sensitive and contentious topic that deserves nuanced discussion. While equality is a crucial principle, we must also recognize and address the realities of systemic discrimination that these programs aim to remedy.
I’ll be following this story closely to see how it unfolds and what the long-term implications might be for minority businesses and diversity initiatives in Florida.
The attorney general’s opinion during the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday is particularly concerning, as it appears to be a politically motivated move rather than one grounded in principles of equal justice.
I’m curious to see how this plays out and whether there will be legal challenges to the opinion. These are complex issues without easy answers.
Questioning the constitutionality of programs designed to support minority-owned businesses and promote diversity seems like a concerning step backwards. More analysis is needed to understand the full implications.
The Legislative Black Caucus raises valid points about Florida’s history of discrimination. Maintaining hard-won progress is crucial, even as we strive for true equality.